|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: already, approximations, before, calculus, crude, curve, dimwit, euclidian, exactly, hand, order, problem, quotderivedquot, sphere, unknowns, works |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
October 31st 05
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under
The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!!
(Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*).!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under a curve, *exactly*.!! brian a m stuckless Mike Lepore wrote: "brian a m stuckless" wrote: Event horizon SPHERE, (circumference)^2 / pi = horizon area.!! I seem to recall seeing this derived in Calculus II or III, but it was too many years ago for me to rattle it off now. -- Mike Lepore email delete the 5 Definitions of mass and force; A critique. Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
October 31st 05
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA un
LoL i R a GrEaT MaThEmAtIcIaN!
LoOk At Me I'm So ImPoRtAnT! Ps EiNsTeIn WaS wRoNg! LoL!
|
|
#3
October 31st 05
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA un
Brian, why not just post random characters?
And Einstein was wrong. He once thought he had the salt shaker, but had picked up the pepper shaker instead.
|
|
#4
October 31st 05
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA un
|
|
#5
October 31st 05
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA un
|
|
#6
October 31st 05
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA un
brian a m stuckless wrote: The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! (Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*).!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA under a curve, *exactly*.!! No you don't, you Dimwit; you only need to know the function. You obviously haven't taken a Calculus course, and your posts come across like you're a ten-year old. If you're much older than that, you should know better. --- Christopher Heckman
|
|
#7
November 1st 05
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.chem,sci.physics.particle,sci.math
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calculus ONLY works for crude *APPROXiMATiONs*, of *UNknowns*. The Euclidian SPHERE is ALREADY *exactly* "derived", you Dimwit.!! The PROBLEM with Calculus is you HAVE to know a curve *exactly*, BEFORE HAND, in order to know any AREA un
Look up ..don't look back.
brian a m stuckless Proginoskes wrote: wrote: LoL i R a GrEaT MaThEmAtIcIaN! LoOk At Me I'm So ImPoRtAnT! Ps EiNsTeIn WaS wRoNg! LoL! It looks like we have a winner to the 2005 B1FF AWARD!!!!!?!?!!!!!! brian a m stuckless will take his place among previous winners [sic], including: B1FF McElwain In addition to this award, brian a m stuckless will receive ... a boot to the head, -- insert ..see top of PAGE.!! -- and a lifetime supply of CAPS LOCK keys. --- Christopher Heckman
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PD ..the "more fundamental" dimwit.!! | brian a m stuckless | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | October 22nd 05 05:01 PM |
| Hawking's Formula Derived from "More is Different" | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | September 6th 05 01:35 AM |
| Dirac Matrices Derived From "Generalized PI" 2 | OsherD | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | July 20th 05 07:54 AM |
| Dirac Matrices Derived From "Generalized PI" | OsherD | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 18th 05 05:21 PM |
| Problem fitting a curve | proton | Physics - General Discussion | 12 | March 3rd 05 07:30 PM |
Linear Mode
