![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: growth, inflation, light, lights |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Light's inflation is an example of a physics no one is talking about.
When they do I predict it will be cutting edge; perhaps the most important discovery of the begining of the 21st century as far as a new physics is concerned. The question behind Light Inflation is simple: What if light is emitted that is very large? Will it take time to form? How long? What if there were, let's say, a billion year light wave emitted? In the extreme of gravity this is a possibility. But we have to ask how long it would take to form this giant wave? If light is local we would expect it to take a billion years to grow to that size. I call this growth Light Inflation. But this is rather odd. What form would the yet to be fully formed light waves take? What does an unformed light wave look like? Is light lame? I look forward to the future physics of Light's Inflation. Take note that at the surface of a so called "black hole" General Relativity predicts the emission of an infinite light wave. I believe this is the theoretical proof that black holes do not exist. They predict energyless light and that is nonsense. The physics that replaces black holes limits the size of a possible light wave to a less than infinite size. I have to ask though: what if a light wave bigger than the universe is emitted? I know this is a strange sounding question but there is nothing in Einstein's theory of gravity that says this is not possible. Gravity could redshift the emitted light so much that it could be arbitrarily large. The paradox of where it would fit I call the Redshift Paradox. Perhaps light's inflation will explain what would happed if light with such a low energy as to be bigger the universe is emitted. Either way this future physics will be fun to contemplate. Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls-- |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nick wrote: Light's inflation is an example of a physics no one is talking about. When they do I predict it will be cutting edge; perhaps the most important discovery of the begining of the 21st century as far as a new physics is concerned. The question behind Light Inflation is simple: What if light is emitted that is very large? Will it take time to form? How long? What if there were, let's say, a billion year light wave emitted? In the extreme of gravity this is a possibility. But we have to ask how long it would take to form this giant wave? If light is local we would expect it to take a billion years to grow to that size. I call this growth Light Inflation. But this is rather odd. What form would the yet to be fully formed light waves take? What does an unformed light wave look like? Is light lame? I look forward to the future physics of Light's Inflation. Take note that at the surface of a so called "black hole" General Relativity predicts the emission of an infinite light wave. I believe this is the theoretical proof that black holes do not exist. They predict energyless light and that is nonsense. The physics that replaces black holes limits the size of a possible light wave to a less than infinite size. I have to ask though: what if a light wave bigger than the universe is emitted? I know this is a strange sounding question but there is nothing in Einstein's theory of gravity that says this is not possible. Gravity could redshift the emitted light so much that it could be arbitrarily large. The paradox of where it would fit I call the Redshift Paradox. Perhaps light's inflation will explain what would happed if light with such a low energy as to be bigger the universe is emitted. Either way this future physics will be fun to contemplate. Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls-- What a concept! Let's go out and collect all the radios tuned to a local station and put them all in the same pail. The 'inflated', then condensed light will probably trigger a warm fusion reaction in the pail. We'll have yet another source of free energy. Sheesh! 8-) Sue... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Nick" wrote in message oups.com... | Light's inflation is an example of a physics no one is talking about. You don't know enough physics to discuss it. You just want to blast you own stupidity at everyone. Androcles. | When they do I predict it will be cutting edge; perhaps the most | important discovery of the begining of the 21st century as far as a new | physics is concerned. | | The question behind Light Inflation is simple: What if light is emitted | that is very large? Will it take time to form? How long? What if there | were, let's say, a billion year light wave emitted? In the extreme of | gravity this is a possibility. But we have to ask how long it would | take to form this giant wave? If light is local we would expect it to | take a billion years to grow to that size. I call this growth Light | Inflation. But this is rather odd. What form would the yet to be fully | formed light waves take? What does an unformed light wave look like? | | Is light lame? | | I look forward to the future physics of Light's Inflation. | Take note that at the surface of a so called "black hole" General | Relativity predicts the emission of an infinite light wave. I believe | this is the theoretical proof that black holes do not exist. They | predict energyless light and that is nonsense. | | The physics that replaces black holes limits the size of a possible | light wave to a less than infinite size. I have to ask though: what if | a light wave bigger than the universe is emitted? I know this is a | strange sounding question but there is nothing in Einstein's theory of | gravity that says this is not possible. Gravity could redshift the | emitted light so much that it could be arbitrarily large. The paradox | of where it would fit I call the Redshift Paradox. | | Perhaps light's inflation will explain what would happed if light with | such a low energy as to be bigger the universe is emitted. Either way | this future physics will be fun to contemplate. | | Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls-- | |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
If a light wave is very big lets say a
light year in size would we have to wait for a year for it to form when it is emitted? If light is local then the answer would be yes. What is unformed light? Is light lame? What would the unformed light wave look like? Finally, how does light expand or inflate to become its full size? They are good questions. These are the future of physics. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TomGee? About the evidence for light's measured mass? | Nick | Physics - General Discussion | 42 | July 6th 05 09:36 PM |
| endogenous growth theory | markdemers15@hotmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | July 4th 05 01:28 AM |
| Can extra light speed plant growth ? | habshi | Physics - General Discussion | 51 | May 10th 04 11:33 AM |
| The Growth of Astrophysical Understanding | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | November 4th 03 09:11 PM |
| Indefinite measurements of light's properties. | Starblade Darksquall | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | July 7th 03 11:21 AM |