$ 'GR cannon-ball "feelings"'; By jOE Fischer
[Who cares a cannon-ball has "no feeling" off a TOWER of PiZZA.]
[There is NO cannon-ball, in GR (NO mass RELATED to G_uv=T_uv).]
brian a m stuckless

Henry Haapalainen wrote: "Joe Fischer"
kirjoitti viestissä ...
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:11:56 GMT, "Bill Hobba"
wrote: "Joe Fischer" wrote :
: Acceleration is a change of motion or change in rate of
: motion, but is not as easy to define in the Electrodynamic
: Divergence of Matter as in other models.

Simply more kooky nonsense. Acceleration has a well defined
meaning in physics as rate of change of velocity.

Or rather well defined in Newtonian mechanics.
Physics changes quite often.

And velocity also has a well defined
meaning - rate of change of position.

I seem to remember a well accepted theory that
predicts traveling 10 light years in one year
at .9 c.

I had the perception that you embraced General
Relativity, but if you don't like the idea of time slowing,
I must have been wrong.

Stick to the usual meanings and you may be able to get
somewhere. Rest of rubbish snipped.
Bill

Good advice, never try anything new, just do the
same forever.

Joe Fischer

Acceleration is not always acceleration. Observer in a free-fall
does not feel any acceleration.

Henry Haapalainen

brian a m stuckless wrote:
$ 'GR cannon-ball "feelings"'; By jOE Fischer
[Who cares a cannon-ball has "no feeling" off a TOWER of PiZZA.]
[There is NO cannon-ball, in GR (NO mass RELATED to G_uv=T_uv).]
brian a m stuckless

Henry Haapalainen wrote: "Joe Fischer"
kirjoitti viestissä ...

On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:11:56 GMT, "Bill Hobba"
wrote: "Joe Fischer" wrote :

: Acceleration is a change of motion or change in rate of
: motion, but is not as easy to define in the Electrodynamic
: Divergence of Matter as in other models.

Simply more kooky nonsense. Acceleration has a well defined
meaning in physics as rate of change of velocity.

Or rather well defined in Newtonian mechanics.
Physics changes quite often.


And velocity also has a well defined
meaning - rate of change of position.

I seem to remember a well accepted theory that
predicts traveling 10 light years in one year
at .9 c.

I had the perception that you embraced General
Relativity, but if you don't like the idea of time slowing,
I must have been wrong.


Stick to the usual meanings and you may be able to get
somewhere. Rest of rubbish snipped.
Bill

Good advice, never try anything new, just do the
same forever.

Joe Fischer


Acceleration is not always acceleration. Observer in a free-fall
does not feel any acceleration.

Henry Haapalainen



You and others seem to be unable to deal with the concept of a
definition. Terms such as velocity and acceleration are defined terms.
Velocity and acceleration are defined as vector quantities as is
position displacement. Simple well defined math (its called differential
calculus) allows us to take the concept of the position of a body and
its displacement and define velocity and acceleration. A definition
cannot be wrong. It can be inconsistent or useless by not corresponding
to anything important in the physical world. But it cannot be wrong. BY
DEFINITION a definition cannot be WRONG.

Dear Mr. fkasner:

Please stop trying to fight insanity. He who battles insanity has it
transferred to themself once the battle is over. The purpose of Usenet
is for a bunch of narcissistic fraternity brats to use up all of
America's precious computer memory (isomorphic to fossil fuel
depletion) and bring down the General System. No meaningful dialectic
is intended. Have a nice day.