![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: relativity, special, theory |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
how to show that in the direction perpendicular to the relative
velocity between two reference frames there is no any contraction or expansion.notes lease deduce from the two principles of the theroy ofspecial relativity. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"vector" wrote in message
ups.com... how to show that in the direction perpendicular to the relative velocity between two reference frames there is no any contraction or expansion.notes lease deduce from the two principles of the theroy ofspecial relativity. Sounds like homework. What are your own thoughts on the problem? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"vector" wrote in message ups.com... | how to show that in the direction perpendicular to the relative | velocity between two reference frames there is no any contraction or | expansion.notes lease deduce from the two principles of the theroy of| special relativity. v = dx/dt cos(pi/2) = cos(90 degrees) = 0. cos(pi/2).v = dy/dt = 0. xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1- 0.vē/cē) = (x-vt)/1 tau = (t-vx/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = (t-vēt/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t(1-vē/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-0.vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1) = t Einstein did not know the difference between speed and velocity. Androcles. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Androcles wrote:
v = dx/dt cos(pi/2) = cos(90 degrees) = 0. cos(pi/2).v = dy/dt = 0. xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1- 0.vē/cē) = (x-vt)/1 tau = (t-vx/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = (t-vēt/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t(1-vē/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-0.vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1) = t Einstein did not know the difference between speed and velocity. Androcles. Says the fumbler Androcles http://www.google.com/search?q=Andro...ers.pandora.be |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Androcles" Androcles@ MyPlace.org wrote in message . uk... "vector" wrote in message ups.com... | how to show that in the direction perpendicular to the relative | velocity between two reference frames there is no any contraction or | expansion.notes lease deduce from the two principles of the theroy of| special relativity. v = dx/dt cos(pi/2) = cos(90 degrees) = 0. cos(pi/2).v = dy/dt = 0. xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1- 0.vē/cē) = (x-vt)/1 tau = (t-vx/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = (t-vēt/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t(1-vē/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-0.vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1) = t Einstein did not know the difference between speed and velocity. Androcles. Androcles does not understand the meaning of any of the variables in any of the equations. Title: "Androcles and the Variables": http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Variables.html Brilliant :-) Exercises for "vector": E1: say hello to Androcles, our Village Idiot. E2: explain the main error to the idiot. E3: explain to the idiot how he could have saved himself a lot of typing. E4 for "vector": find the additional deliberate error, specially introduced to recover the Galilean transformation that the idiot doesn't understand either. Dirk Vdm |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
in article , vector at
wrote on 10/24/05 12:36 AM: how to show that in the direction perpendicular to the relative velocity between two reference frames there is no any contraction or expansion.notes lease deduce from the two principles of the theroy ofspecial relativity. There is no difference between the two reference frames in the direction perpendicular to the relative velocity vector. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Androcles" Androcles@ MyPlace.org wrote in message . uk... "vector" wrote in message ups.com... | how to show that in the direction perpendicular to the relative | velocity between two reference frames there is no any contraction or | expansion.notes lease deduce from the two principles of the theroy of| special relativity. v = dx/dt cos(pi/2) = cos(90 degrees) = 0. cos(pi/2).v = dy/dt = 0. xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1- 0.vē/cē) = (x-vt)/1 tau = (t-vx/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = (t-vēt/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t(1-vē/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-0.vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1) = t Einstein did not know the difference between speed and velocity. Androcles. Androcles does not understand the meaning of any of the variables in any of the equations. Title: "Androcles and the Variables": http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Variables.html Brilliant :-) Exercises for "vector": E1: say hello to Androcles, our Village Idiot. E2: explain the main error to the idiot. E3: explain to the idiot how he could have saved himself a lot of typing. E4 for "vector": find the additional deliberate error, specially introduced to recover the Galilean transformation that the idiot doesn't understand either. Dirk Vdm Some other idiots (Dirty Van of the Motel, etc.) still try to figure out the square root: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...e1c228c606611b hahahahahahahah Mike |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Mike" wrote in message oups.com... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Androcles" Androcles@ MyPlace.org wrote in message . uk... "vector" wrote in message ups.com... | how to show that in the direction perpendicular to the relative | velocity between two reference frames there is no any contraction or | expansion.notes lease deduce from the two principles of the theroy of| special relativity. v = dx/dt cos(pi/2) = cos(90 degrees) = 0. cos(pi/2).v = dy/dt = 0. xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1- 0.vē/cē) = (x-vt)/1 tau = (t-vx/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = (t-vēt/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t(1-vē/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-0.vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1) = t Einstein did not know the difference between speed and velocity. Androcles. Androcles does not understand the meaning of any of the variables in any of the equations. Title: "Androcles and the Variables": http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...Variables.html Brilliant :-) Exercises for "vector": E1: say hello to Androcles, our Village Idiot. E2: explain the main error to the idiot. E3: explain to the idiot how he could have saved himself a lot of typing. E4 for "vector": find the additional deliberate error, specially introduced to recover the Galilean transformation that the idiot doesn't understand either. Dirk Vdm Some other idiots (Dirty Van of the Motel, etc.) still try to figure out the square root: http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...e1c228c606611b hahahahahahahah Mike Ha, yes, I have created a new one specially for you: Title: "Having real troubles with basic algebra?" http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...lTroubles.html Brilliant :-)) Dirk Vdm |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Androcles" Androcles@ MyPlace.org wrote in message
. uk... "vector" wrote in message ups.com... | how to show that in the direction perpendicular to the relative | velocity between two reference frames there is no any contraction or | expansion.notes lease deduce from the two principles of the theroy of| special relativity. v = dx/dt cos(pi/2) = cos(90 degrees) = 0. cos(pi/2).v = dy/dt = 0. xi = (x-vt)/sqrt(1- 0.vē/cē) = (x-vt)/1 tau = (t-vx/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = (t-vēt/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t(1-vē/cē)/sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1-0.vē/cē) = t*sqrt(1) = t Einstein did not know the difference between speed and velocity. Androcles. You really are an unmitigated idiot. Get a life. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| On basic formalism of special theory of relativity | None | Physics - General Discussion | 66 | November 4th 05 03:52 PM |
| A Derivation of Special Relativity without Invoking Group Theory | Eugene Shubert | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 26th 05 05:26 PM |
| The Special Theory of Relativity is dead | Don110@mac.com | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | December 20th 03 09:11 PM |
| A Viable Alternative to Einstein's Special Relativity Theory | Perfectly Innocent | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | August 26th 03 04:23 PM |
| A Viable Alternative to Einstein's Special Relativity Theory | tj Frazir | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 24th 03 02:50 AM |