In Einstein's Equivalence Principle where an accelerating rocket is
equivalent to a weight in gravity there is a difference. There is a
rate for the accelerating rocket but not for something sitting still in
the gravity field.

TAKE THE RATE OUT OF THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE FOR A WEIGHT IN A
GRAVITY FIELD.

No motion means no rate. THEREFORE THERE IS A TIMELESS ACCELERATION; at
least by equivalence.

---------- How do you like that?
Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --

Nick wrote:
In Einstein's Equivalence Principle where an accelerating rocket is
equivalent to a weight in gravity there is a difference. There is a
rate for the accelerating rocket but not for something sitting still in
the gravity field.

TAKE THE RATE OUT OF THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE FOR A WEIGHT IN A
GRAVITY FIELD.

No motion means no rate. THEREFORE THERE IS A TIMELESS ACCELERATION; at
least by equivalence.

---------- How do you like that?

The Coulomb force pushing up should
***equal*** the gravitational force
pulling down.

Vist some garage sales and collect a load of Cray
simulators and you might show otherwise.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/zam/docs/autoren2002/gibbon
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL...tics/index.htm

I doubt it 'tho. ;o)

Sue...

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --

"Nick" wrote in message
oups.com...
In Einstein's Equivalence Principle where an accelerating rocket is
equivalent to a weight in gravity there is a difference. There is a
rate for the accelerating rocket but not for something sitting still in
the gravity field.

TAKE THE RATE OUT OF THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE FOR A WEIGHT IN A
GRAVITY FIELD.

No motion means no rate. THEREFORE THERE IS A TIMELESS ACCELERATION; at
least by equivalence.

---------- How do you like that?

Very pretty.. add some roses in a nice ceramic vase and you can call it
"Still Life and Equivalence"

Love ya, man

Sue Dorothy Dorothy Dorothy wrote:
Nick wrote:
In Einstein's Equivalence Principle where an accelerating rocket is
equivalent to a weight in gravity there is a difference. There is a
rate for the accelerating rocket but not for something sitting still in
the gravity field.

TAKE THE RATE OUT OF THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE FOR A WEIGHT IN A
GRAVITY FIELD.

No motion means no rate. THEREFORE THERE IS A TIMELESS ACCELERATION; at
least by equivalence.

---------- How do you like that?

The Coulomb force pushing up should
***equal*** the gravitational force
pulling down.

Sensible Sue strikes again ....


Vist some garage sales and collect a load of Cray
simulators and you might show otherwise.
http://www.fz-juelich.de/zam/docs/autoren2002/gibbon
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL...tics/index.htm

I doubt it 'tho. ;o)

Sue...

Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --

Vist some garage sales and collect a load of Cray
simulators and you might show otherwise.

***********************

OK, I'll make that a project for today. Lots of people just dying to
sell their old Cray Simulators. I've seen 'em for 4 or 5 bucks apiece.

Approx. 23 Oct 2005 21:39:36 -0700, someone calling themselves "Nick" let their cat run across the keyboard resulting in:

:-)= In Einstein's Equivalence Principle where an accelerating rocket is
:-)= equivalent to a weight in gravity there is a difference. There is a
:-)= rate for the accelerating rocket but not for something sitting still in
:-)= the gravity field.
:-)=
:-)= TAKE THE RATE OUT OF THE EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE FOR A WEIGHT IN A
:-)= GRAVITY FIELD.
:-)=
:-)= No motion means no rate. THEREFORE THERE IS A TIMELESS ACCELERATION; at
:-)= least by equivalence.
:-)=
:-)= ---------- How do you like that?
:-)= Mitch Raemsch -- Light Falls --

As time and distance are man made for convenience sake to be able to communicate
concepts it follows that velocity and acceleration are man made, being derived from man made tools.

I sit motionless:
In relation to that which is in close proximity.
I am actually moving at a bit over 1000 mph in relation to the earth's core.
I am moving approx. 18.2 miles/second in relation to the sun plus or minus the approx. 1000 mph in increments
depending upon the time of day. etc. as I move in relation to the dormant black hole at the center of our galaxy,
etc. as I move in relation to a theoretical fixed point in this infinite universe.


Light slows down in matter?
Paint a sheet of 5/8" fire rated drywall flat black. That will reflect a small amount of the light striking the drywall.
Virtually 99.99 or more per cent will come to a screeching halt and the impact of the light waves/particles/whatever on
the painted wood pulp covering the gypsum will convert to heat and be transmitted from the drywall sheet as heat.

HTH

If you cannot visualise and accept the infinite universe you sit still in "time". HTDNH, LOL.