A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

So who needs oil or nuclear power?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 9th 05 posted to sci.energy,sci.environment,sci.physics,talk.environment
zzbunker@netscape.net
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,617
Default So who needs oil or nuclear power?

wrote:
Excuse me. At
www.justice-publications.com/GRAVITY.pdf there is the
description of a novel method of propelling ships and of generating
vast quantities of electrical power ad infinitum, both without
combustion, without chemical reaction and without pollution.
Apparently it was published by the Patent Office on August 18th.

It says that the method is available for anybody to use and is
extremely low technology.


We knew that previously though. Since the left-wing's
theory of properelling ships is the extremely reliable
and low technology, and environment friendly method
of catamarans and sailboats.

They are Einstein Level Scientific Genius' too, since
it does work ad infinitum, and it does only work
in the Patent Office.


It certainly looks ridiculously simple and
apparently it produces about 500% p.a. on outlay. But the inventor
stipulates that it must be undertaken without the assistance of
middlemen or outside funding, which he says otherwise would put it and
its consumers into the financiers' hands yet again, as with oil and
everything else we use. Which I suppose is true.


But unfortunatley for the inventor, that's already been invented
though.
Since that's AT&Ts and The New Tork Times idiot theory of how ships
work.


The article suggests that within five or ten years it will make oil
redundant except as a lubricant, which will take the wind out of some
folks' sails, won't it, and should make a refreshing change all around
the planet.


Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So who needs oil or nuclear power? Roger Coppock Physics - General Discussion 69 October 19th 05 12:37 AM
So who needs oil or nuclear power? dbohara@mindspring.com Physics - General Discussion 2 October 9th 05 03:07 PM
AUSTRALIA SHIFTING TO NUCLEAR POWER Jean-Paul Turcaud Physics - General Discussion 0 May 19th 05 05:16 AM
SUNFLOWER OIL TO POWER FUTURE CARS (Repost) Dr. Jai Maharaj Physics - General Discussion 16 November 4th 04 04:07 PM
SUNFLOWER OIL TO POWER FUTURE CARS Dr. Jai Maharaj Physics - General Discussion 19 October 11th 04 12:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Property in Spain - Myspace Layouts - Loans - Motorcycle Insurance UK - Knitting Tips