A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 2nd 05 posted to sci.physics.particle,sci.math,sci.chem,sci.physics
brian a m stuckless
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,468
Default Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass

Teach us SOMEthing NEW about your job, HARRY CONOVER.!!
Missy TERESA NAUGHTY KNOTT taught you, SiZE matters".!!
$ DoooOP DOooOP De dooOP De dooOP De dooOP De dooOP.!!

$ (ONE kilogram - TWO kilogram) = - ONE kilogram.!!
Harry ..minus sign, you know (-), means negative".!!
So, ARE you trying to be a PROPER ASShole, HARRY.?!!

Any variable of term, i^2*x, can be "negative mass".!!

Newton's LAWs of MECHANiCS apply, CENTRO-symmetrically.!!
Maxwell's LAWs of ELECTRODYNAMiCs, BETWEEN FLAT PLATEs.!!
RELATiViTY applies in SPACEtime at ONE WORLDline POiNT.!!
This TRiPLE jUXTAPOSiTiON is iNHERENTLY irreconcilable.!!

The COLLATERAL BENEFiT is what CAUSED SPACEtime CURVATURE.!!

$ SiMPLE PANTHEiSM
ATHEiSM the VERY most SiMPLE virtual OBjECTiFiCATiON of GOD.!!
PANTHEiSM the SiMPLE virtual OBjECTiFiCATiON of His SYNONYM.!!
jUDiSM more COMPLEX virtual OBjECTiFiCATiON of THAT one GOD.!!
jUDAEO cHRiSTiANs MOST virtual OBjECTiFiCATiON EVER, of GOD.!!
jESUS CHRiSTiANs say "NO virtual OBjECTiFiCATiON of IAM He".!!

* CREATiON vs VACUUM.!!
VACUUM is a MENTAL state or condition, ..in the mind or out.!!
(VARiOUS vacu ONLY exist in SQUEEZED Swiss-cheese-LiKE minds.)

$ BEFORE creation and SUBsequent evolution
Once upon a time ( ..before time, actually), BEFORE CREATiON,
GOD lived in VACUUM; He *HAD* to CREATE a Life for Himself.!!

* NO iNFiNiTY at all.!!
There NEVER ever WAS, yet, even ONE (1) iNFiNiTY.!!
There never EVER will BE, even ONE (1) iNFiNiTY.!!

The GUESS temperature increments are *QUANTiZED*.!!
-[ i.e. 10^29*F*hbar*(PLANCK Tp) = 1*(Kelvin K) ]-

Note the GUESS statistical unit:
FARADAY F = Na*{e} = Ra*{e} / k = 1 / 10^29*hbar
Na = Avagadro's NUMBER
{e} = Electron CHARGE
k = Boltzmann's CONSTANT
hbar = PLANCK's h / 2*pi
-[Observe LEFT SiDE over / ( No BOTTOM bracket )].

..i GUESS i digress.!!

Web note:
Mercury perturbations and stellar deviation during an eclipse


The GUESS explains "Mercury perturbations and stellar deviation
during an eclipse" ..which are the admitted Newtonian problems:

GUESS Model's AMBiENT MEDiA FACTOR (n - 1) FULLY compensates GR.

GUESS solves the GR gtr MYSTERY increase of mass with velocity.

GUESS general planck stefan boltzmann stuckless PHOTON energy:
[ nL*(h + nA*hbar))=nL*Ni*h/sec=nL*Ni*Qx*Joule/10^25*("e")^4 ]

The GUESS planck stefan boltzmann stuckless PHOTON ENERGY:
[nL*(h + nA*hbar))=nL*Ni*h/sec=nL*Ni*Qx*Joule/10^25*(e)^4]

nL*(h + nA*hbar) nL*Ni*h nL*Ni*Qx*Joule
= -- -- --- -- -- = -- - -- = -- -- -- -- --
1 sec 10^25*(e)^4.

The planck stefan boltzmann stuckless energy.

Web comment:
Neither gravitational nor inertial mass has
anything to do with molecular arrangement/composition. --


Reply: lattice vacancy in ambient
NOT TRUE, for ANY gravitational or inertial mass with a CAViTY.!!
Note that EVERY lattice VACANCY or electron HOLE provides LiFT.!!

As UNCLE ALice would surely say, in YOUR case ..HARY H CONOVER :
-[ "The Dumb ___ ****HEAD is a boring psychotic ididot".!! ]-

What PARTiCULAR disagreement do you have with this, Harry.?!!

Again, ONE 1 kg minus 2 kg is equal to minus 1 kg, Dimwit.!!

NEGATiVE ONE kg is "negative UNiT mass" ..ASShole.!!

VERY sincerely u c,
```Brian ( You can call me DR-like.!! )

NO more is more.!!
'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'
____ _ _ _ _
| _ \ | | ___ _ __ | | __ | | | |
| |_) | | | / _ \ | '_ \ | |/ / |_| |_|
The BiG | __/ | | | (_) | | | | | | _ _ _
|_| |_| \___/ |_| |_| |_|\_\ (_) (_) (_)

..-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,

wrote:
Iian, you really need to learn to differentiate between
theoretical and mathematical abstractions and the real
physical world!

For example, imaginary numbers and complex representations
are commonly used to represent usually real-time phenomena
that cannot otherwise be easily communicated using a pen
and paper. Similarly, negative energy is employed usually
to describe the extent and nature of an energy or potential
well. In electrical engineering a current sink is something
that in effect presents a negative current source, while a
power sink is something that can be measured in turms of
and respesented by a source of negative power. Imaginary
numbers and complex planes are simply a way of
mathematicially dealing with things like voltage and
current which have an out-of-phase correspondence. Just
like a power sink and a complex representation of wave
behavior, negative mass has it's role to play in the
mathematical modeling of physical events.

If you truly wish to understand these concepts, rather than like a
child, dwelling on ridiculous sci-fi material, invested your time and
energy into learning a bit of mathematics and introductory physics you
wouldn't be making stupid posts like his to a sci hierarchy newsgroup.
Likely if you counted all the hours you have like spent focusing on
childish sci-fi pablum, you could have likely acquired at least an
introductory level of real knowledge for yourself had you spent those
wasted hours taking introductory course or two at your local
university.

Curmudgeonly yours, Harry C.


Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass ianparker2@gmail.com Physics - General Discussion 6 October 18th 05 05:39 AM
negative mass brian a m stuckless Physics - General Discussion 2 September 29th 05 08:53 PM
negative mass mbd Physics - General Discussion 6 May 19th 05 04:29 PM
Negative Mass Solutions island Current Physics Research (Moderated) 8 December 26th 04 09:47 PM
Particles of Negative Orthodoxy and Mass... ;) island Current Physics Research (Moderated) 0 August 8th 04 12:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loan - Mortgages - Credit Card - Bad Credit Mortgages - Smallworld GIS