![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: accelerating, expanding, matter, stability, universe |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
More potential WMD danger in the Woodward, Puthoff & Shipov approach to
change m if e/m ratios change in the process. Woodward using Mach's Principle Puthoff using PV (won't work fortunately) Shipov using torsion (may work - dangerous) Their schemes could increase e/m and increase the repulsive (J/mcr)^2 faster than the attractive - e^2/mc^2r in the case of the stability of the hydrogen atom studied in the paper by Price. V = @hc/mr + e^2/mr + (J/mr)^2 + /\zpfr^2 see Price's eq (11) p.5 - note his r^2 term - interesting r = a(t)R Price's eq. (1) http://www.arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0508052 Internal dark energy core /\zpf may adjust to prevent the electrons and quarks as thin extended shells of charge from exploding. The atoms will still explode, which is bad enough. For hydrogen atom, m is reduced mass ~ electron mass with orbital angular momentum L V/mc^2 = - e^2/mc^2r + (L/mcr)2 + /\r^2 Compare the Coulomb attraction between electron & proton with the centrifugal barrier As m is decreased the repulsive centrifugal potential scales as 1/m^2 whilst the Coulomb attraction scales only as 1/m. Therefore the danger of instability grows if m is decreased to get NON-GEODESIC PROPELLANTLESS PROPULSION the way Woodward, Puthoff & Shipov all seem to want to do via different schemes. Even in my GEODESIC WWD (Weightless Warp Drive) PROPELLANTLESS PROPULSION from tweaking the Goldstone Phase of the Higgs Field one must be careful not to disturb m on the scale of the atoms. Begin forwarded message: From: " Date: September 29, 2005 10:25:12 AM PDT To: Subject: Expanding waistline? Don't blame the expanding universe Reply-To: " This week's top stories from the web's No.1 science and technology news service 29 September 2005 Welcome to the New Scientist newsletter, which this week reveals why we can't blame our expanding waistlines on the expansion of the universe, the vibrating clothes that help sports stars hone their skills, and the pill-sized camera that crawls through your intestine..Anil Ananthaswamy, Physical Sciences News Editor, Print Edition Expanding Problem Is your waistline spreading? Unfortunately you can no longer use the expansion of the universe as an excuse. While some things, such as clusters of galaxies, are known to stretch as the universe expands, physicists assumed that others, such as people, do not. But until now no one was sure why. It turns out that as long as the force - electromagnetic or gravitational - holding objects together exceeds a certain critical value, the expansion of the universe has no effect on them. This means that while you can't blame your bulging waistline on an expanding universe, at least we're not all about to be pulled apart... http://www.newscientist.com/article....mg18825194.800 |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Accelerating Expansion of the Universe | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 5th 05 09:20 PM |
| Inflation and the current accelerating expansion of the universe | Big Mike | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | July 20th 04 10:09 AM |
| Accelerating universe will limit technology | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | May 8th 04 05:43 PM |
| Article] Accelerating Universe theory dispels dark energy | Robert Karl Stonjek | Physics - General Discussion | 11 | July 21st 03 04:11 AM |