Don't know if this is anything new or anything usefull at all but I carry
this with me since a long time. And I think it is time to get ride of it.
When I was once 'playing' with some energy formulas I got this formulas I
and II:

I: E = (c^5 / G) * t
II: E = (c^4 / G) * l
III: E = c^2 * m (Einstein)

whereas, c is the speed of light constant in vacuum and G the gravitational
constant. t is time, l is length, E is energy and m is mass.

Till today I considered it as irrelevant nonsense but I checked about the
planck units lately and saw that they look somehow simular. You can insert
the planck time in I and you get the planck energy. And you can insert the
planck length in II and you get the planck energy. With the planck units at
hand the formula I and II could be build easily stright forward (put planck
energy to the left of the equation, the planck unit to the right and seek
the missing factor), but I got them on another but simular 'nothing saying'
way.
I know that the planck units are constructs too (were build by playing with
constants) but with todays unifying theories they have gotten strong
relevance.
I wanted to check how I and II would work with GR, but I am not a physicist
and I would have to learn the mathematics of GR first which I havent time
for. But the idea I have in mind:I think the time-space curvature could
maybe happen because the reduction of energy containing in time and space
(if we assume I and II would be a correct describtion of the nature which is
of course in question) to satisfactory or build the mass. But that's just an
idea.

As I say to the beginning I dont know if I and II is more than nonsense and
if it is not already known (with the planck units it lays on the hand). I
can't do anything usefully with it. But maybe one of you can. That's why I
wanted to share it.

Lombo