![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: mass, matter, quantity |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mass is a quantity of matter, and inertia is its measu
For any given object; body or mass of matter, it's inertia is the ratio of the weight [w] it exerts on, and/or is exerted by a weight scale, to the acceleration [g] at which it will free fall at that location; which is equal to the net force [f] exerted on, and/or by it, to the acceleration [the rate of change in velocity (a = acceleration)] that the force causes, and/or the deceleration; the rate at which the mass would accelerate, except for being restrained by an equal; opposite force: m = w/g = f/a. You're probably all familiar with that old joke about the irresistible force meeting the immovable object(;^) |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Donald G. Shead" wrote:
Mass is a quantity of matter, and inertia is its measu [snip] Weyl tensor, ****Head. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net! |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Donald G. Shead" wrote in message
m... Mass is a quantity of matter, and inertia is its measu A ~quantity~? You make it sound like mass is seperate from the matter... like "freezing is a quantity of temperature"... or that the matter is a symptom of the mass.. care to try again? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ronald Stepp" wrote in message .. . "Donald G. Shead" wrote in message m... Mass is a quantity of matter, and inertia is its measu A ~quantity~? You make it sound like mass is seperate from the matter... like "freezing is a quantity of temperature"... or that the matter is a symptom of the mass.. care to try again? So you think mass _is_ matter, and explain the kilogram as a unit of it? What about the Higgs? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Donald G. Shead" wrote in message m... Mass is a quantity of matter, and inertia is its measu For any given object; body or mass of matter, it's inertia is the ratio of the weight [w] it exerts on, and/or is exerted by a weight scale, to the acceleration [g] at which it will free fall at that location; which is equal to the net force [f] exerted on, and/or by it, to the acceleration [the rate of change in velocity (a = acceleration)] that the force causes, and/or the deceleration; the rate at which the mass would accelerate, except for being restrained by an equal; opposite force: m = w/g = f/a. You're probably all familiar with that old joke about the irresistible force meeting the immovable object(;^) The kilogram is one _unit_ quantity of matter in that its inertia [w/g] is numerically equal to its weight [9.81 newtons], divided by the acceleration [g = 9.81 m/sec˛] at which it will free fall; where [w/g = 1 N sec˛/m = 1 kg.]. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mathew Orman wrote:
Thank you for promoting knowledge about the true physical property of matter! You should thank Shead by private email, Orman, lest you look like Shead's fool. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Donald G. Shead" wrote in message
... "Ronald Stepp" wrote in message .. . "Donald G. Shead" wrote in message m... Mass is a quantity of matter, and inertia is its measu A ~quantity~? You make it sound like mass is seperate from the matter... like "freezing is a quantity of temperature"... or that the matter is a symptom of the mass.. care to try again? So you think mass _is_ matter, and explain the kilogram as a unit of it? What about the Higgs? What about it? You can't even figure out 32 instead of 16 as g.... why should I debate with someone that clueless? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
There's some real live inertial mathematics!
![]() "Donald G. Shead" wrote in message m... "Donald G. Shead" wrote in message m... Mass is a quantity of matter, and inertia is its measu For any given object; body or mass of matter, it's inertia is the ratio of the weight [w] it exerts on, and/or is exerted by a weight scale, to the acceleration [g] at which it will free fall at that location; which is equal to the net force [f] exerted on, and/or by it, to the acceleration [the rate of change in velocity (a = acceleration)] that the force causes, and/or the deceleration; the rate at which the mass would accelerate, except for being restrained by an equal; opposite force: m = w/g = f/a. You're probably all familiar with that old joke about the irresistible force meeting the immovable object(;^) The kilogram is one _unit_ quantity of matter in that its inertia [w/g] is numerically equal to its weight [9.81 newtons], divided by the acceleration [g = 9.81 m/sec˛] at which it will free fall; where [w/g = 1 N sec˛/m = 1 kg.]. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gail wrote:
There's some real live inertial mathematics! ![]() Newton's Second Law http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/phys...SecondLaw.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter | Y.Porat | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | July 20th 03 09:48 PM |
| Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | July 19th 03 01:59 PM |
| Article] 'Mass map' probes dark matter | Robert Karl Stonjek | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 19th 03 04:55 AM |
| Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter | Pyriform | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | July 18th 03 07:25 AM |
| Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 17th 03 04:45 AM |