xxein:
"Abhi"

Any way, my IQ is zero..

-Abhi.

xxein: Aha! I knew it. Don't ever try to argue with me again
because my IQ score is 120% greater than yours. No wonder that you
can't speak Klingon with the proper btnkukak.

That makes your IQ zero.

IQ tests don't work. According to that test, the older you get the dumber you
get.

IQ = test/ age


S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message
...
IQ tests don't work. According to that test, the older you get the
dumber you
get.

IQ = test/ age


S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


RKS:
No, brains don't work!! The older they get, the dumber they get

--
Kind Regards,
Robert Karl Stonjek.

On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 06:44:44 GMT, "Robert Karl Stonjek"
wrote:


"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message
...
IQ tests don't work. According to that test, the older you get the
dumber you
get.

IQ = test/ age


S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


RKS:
No, brains don't work!! The older they get, the dumber they get

But the experience they gain over time more than makes up for their drop in
efficiency.

Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!

See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 06:44:44 GMT, "Robert Karl Stonjek"
wrote:


"S. Enterprize Company" wrote in message
...
IQ tests don't work. According to that test, the older you get
the
dumber you
get.

IQ = test/ age


S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


RKS:
No, brains don't work!! The older they get, the dumber they get

But the experience they gain over time more than makes up for their
drop in
efficiency.

RKS:
Thanks - I'll be using that thought more and more as my dotage descends



Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!

RKS:
There are now two components of the big bang:
1) the singularity that evolves, expands, and becomes the universe;
2) the magic wand.


See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

On 5 Jul 2003 18:41:57 -0700, (Alan McIntire) wrote:

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message ...
IQ tests don't work. According to that test, the older you get the dumber you
get.

IQ = test/ age

You're referring to the original Benet system. In that case, your
intelligence maxes out at around age 12, so you shouldn't use a
denominator greater than 12. The old formula you refer to is obsolete.
Using the original Benet formula resulted in inconsistencies in
relative ingelligence for children of different ages at the same
standard deviation above or below normal. It's now been normalized,
so the standard deviation is 15 or 16 points, depending on the test
used.

The name is 'Binet' .

The results have also been standardised so that the female mean will be the
same as male.



S. Enterprize Co. (Membership)
http://www.s-enterprize.com/
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!

See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 00:22:30 GMT, "Robert Karl Stonjek"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message


RKS:
Thanks - I'll be using that thought more and more as my dotage descends


It is true. I think peopel who exercise their brains, for instance with a
computer, will stay pretty intelligent. It will be interesting to see the long
term effects of our modern lifestyles compared with the those of our recent
ancestors.
Even sixty years ago, the majority of those who managed to reach the (then)
ripe old age of sixty had few constructive or creative outlets that might
stimulate their minds.



Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!

RKS:
There are now two components of the big bang:
1) the singularity that evolves, expands, and becomes the universe;
2) the magic wand.

Ah! The dreaded magic! I forgot about that!



Henri Wilson.
The BIG BANG Theory = The creationists' attempt to hijack science!
But they didn't succeed!

See my animations at:
http://www.users.bigpond.com/HeWn/index.htm

"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 00:22:30 GMT, "Robert Karl Stonjek"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message


RKS:
Thanks - I'll be using that thought more and more as my dotage
descends


It is true. I think peopel who exercise their brains, for instance
with a
computer, will stay pretty intelligent. It will be interesting to see
the long
term effects of our modern lifestyles compared with the those of our
recent
ancestors.
Even sixty years ago, the majority of those who managed to reach the
(then)
ripe old age of sixty had few constructive or creative outlets that
might
stimulate their minds.

RKS:
Cave painting?

--
Kind Regards,
Robert Karl Stonjek.

In article ,
(Edward Green) wrote:
"Robert Karl Stonjek" wrote in message
...
"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 00:22:30 GMT, "Robert Karl Stonjek"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message


RKS:
Thanks - I'll be using that thought more and more as my dotage
descends


It is true. I think peopel who exercise their brains, for instance
with a
computer, will stay pretty intelligent. It will be interesting to see
the long
term effects of our modern lifestyles compared with the those of our
recent
ancestors.
Even sixty years ago, the majority of those who managed to reach the
(then)
ripe old age of sixty had few constructive or creative outlets that
might
stimulate their minds.

RKS:
Cave painting?

Conversation?

I would think that WWII was quite stimulating. Is it a sign
of old age when '60 years ago' doesn't imply ancient times?

/BAH


Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.

"Robert Karl Stonjek" wrote in message ...
"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message
...
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 00:22:30 GMT, "Robert Karl Stonjek"
wrote:


"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message


RKS:
Thanks - I'll be using that thought more and more as my dotage
descends


It is true. I think peopel who exercise their brains, for instance
with a
computer, will stay pretty intelligent. It will be interesting to see
the long
term effects of our modern lifestyles compared with the those of our
recent
ancestors.
Even sixty years ago, the majority of those who managed to reach the
(then)
ripe old age of sixty had few constructive or creative outlets that
might
stimulate their minds.

RKS:
Cave painting?

Conversation?