![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: claim, red, shift |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
************************************************** ********
****************Original article*********************** EXPANSION OF UNIVERSE SOLE EXPLANATION OF RED SHIFT Are the distant nebulae redder than the nearer ones because they are receding with enormous speed or, as many like to believe, is there some other explanation, such as attributing the red shift to the action of electrons in free space? Prof. Roy Kennedy and Walter Barkas of the University of Washington announced at the meeting of the Pacific division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science that they had tested the matter experimentally and found that electrons could not be held responsible because there are not enough of them. They used a special instrument called an interferometer, designed by Prof. Kennedy, which is capable of detecting a change of a billionth of an inch in a foot. Still no effect of electrons could be seen even with millions of millions present. Prof. R.C. Tolman, new president of the Pacific division of the Association, announced that he and Dr. Edwin P. Hubble, recent winner of the Barnard medal for his work on the red shift, were practically convinced that no known effect other then recession of the nebulae was competent to account for the observations of the red shift. From scienceNews, July 13, 1935, issue http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/...6/timeline.asp Comment: Some revisionists (on this forum and on others) have tried to claim that "we knew all along that it was space that was expanding" or similar wishful thinking. This report in a science magazine contemporary to the events reports that scientists believed that it was objects travelling at high velocity (away from the observer) that was the cause of the red shift. They were quite wrong. Edwin Hubble did not discover the redshift but was the first to correlate the amount of redshift with the distance of stellar objects. RC Tolman practically invented the field of relativistic thermodynamics. His books, such as "The Principles of Statistical Mechanics" and "Relativity Thermodynamics and Cosmology" are still available and well worth occupying the shelf of the serious relativist/thermodynamicist. ************************************************** ************* My Comments, A cause to the red shift is claimed to be proven not caused by the presence of matter. And the experiment used electrons and not the dark matter between the stars. A relation of space to the force necessary was utilized and the electrons produced the necessary force density. And the quanta of the electron was therefor held truthful. A kind of nonfalsifiable experiment was reported above. And the scientist's truth rested on the force of the electron. And so to cause the redshift's truth was the experiment's intention. A single relation was present to take the force of gravity and relate. Implying the force as any force behaves indentically in relation to the quanta. And so the transformation of choice is revealed. A quanta's effect on the existing quanta was to be tested. And the electron was chosen. And here is the comparision of my claim to this scientist's claim. The redshift proves the effect of quanta. And his experiment avoids the issue by measuing what, distance. A true measure of redshift was necessary, not the distance of the effect in inference. A redshift detector was necessary. A kind of scientific lie was apparent and the necessary ability to unravel it was substantial. The depth's to which certain people go to say everything is A-OK is the same level as history's record indicates. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is a veryrelevant interaction.
Basically from Plasmas and Electro-magnetic Fields, One can consider Redshift as a frequency Shift. One needs to devlop COMPREHENSION of Cosmos if EXPANSION THEORIES need to be considered for any justification. SCIENCE has to progress to integrate concepts on SOURCE,FIELDS, FLOWS and REFLECTORS that help to search PRIME ORIGINS. COSMICPOT SPREAD in Three Tier Mode is explained in my Books and Projections. Papers are presented at Carnegie Symposium 3 and STSCI May 2003. I openly look for CO-Investigators in further search to complete these dialogues COSMOLOGY through vedas help to develop this approach. CAN some one help to establish EAST-WEST Interaction. http://in.geocities.com/vidyanand1941/ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Red shift check | Old Man | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | December 24th 04 07:41 AM |
| Red shift check | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | December 24th 04 07:34 AM |
| Measuring red shift | Ed Keane III | Physics - General Discussion | 33 | February 9th 04 11:06 PM |
| Momentum From Nothing and red shift | John Devers | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 0 | January 25th 04 12:05 PM |
| alternative explanation of red-shift | Jonathan Y Stein | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 6 | October 5th 03 02:45 AM |