![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: principle, uncertainty, unnecessary |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[TheHUP.wpd]: Ass backwards before cart.!! (..a rePOST)
Especially with an electron particle's 'POSiTiON', no matter where you point or place its exact coordinates (i mean on top of your lab bench, under your lab bench, or here, there, or any ELSEwhere ..it DOES NOT matter); SURELY, there will certainly be one RiGHT THERE.!! Momentum UNCERTAiNTY decreases with increased STRAiGHTness of path. THEREFO a. SiNCE the electron (if its going ANYwhere) is going around in little cycles at an EXACT tiny spot on your bench (or where-ever); ..THEN its orbital path CANNOT BE very STRAiGHT ..now CAN it.?!! b. AND since its PATH obviously CANNOT BE very STRAiGHT; So, its Momentum VECTOR, then, obviously likewise CANNOT BE very CERTAiN.!! Momentum UNCERTAiNTY has nothing PRACTiCAL to do with ANY sort of 'canonical conjugate'. Even if EVERY point on a path is ABSOLUTELY known, its VELOCiTY vector still depends ARBiTRARiLY on YOUR choice of ANY TWO pre-REQUiSiTE VELOCiTY vector END-points ON its path.!! At what LiMiT does the TWO endPOiNTs of a VECTOR become jUST ONE? At what LiMiT is a VELOCiTY numerator NOT a 'delta' function.?!! --or a velocity DENOMiNATOR suddenly NOT be a DELTA function.?!! At what LiMiT and how is the following mathematics transformed?: (DiFFERENCE in COORDiNATEs)/(DiFFERENCE in TiMEs)=VELOCiTY. Note ANY velocity NUMERATOR is STiLL a DELTA function EVEN iF the TWO delta-function COORDiNATES are equal (both located at the same position) ..or EVEN if that DENOMiNATOR has 'limit zero' TiMiNG. The MORE focus applied to ONE PART of any MOMENTUM velocity VECTOR; the LESS focus there CAN be (at SAME time) on ANY OTHER PART of it. NoBODY CAN FOCUS on BOTH ENDs of a VELOCiTY VECTOR, at once, duh.!! (Let alone measuring MOMENTUM ..DURiNG that SAME PERiOD, too, duh.) NOTE: Heisenberg's UNcertainty Principle (..or more appropriately, Heisenberg's UN-NECESSARY Principle), delivers superb COLLATERAL BENEFiTs and economic TURNOVER for HORDs in PULP & paper FiCTiON.!! COLLATERAL BENEFiTs caused Heisenberg's UN-NECESSARY UNcertainty.!! (Sure, COLLATERAL BENEFiTs even caused SPACEtime CURVATURE.!!) Momentum VECTOR ABCs and quantum gravity: Momentum is a VECTOR quantity --NOT conjugate of POSiTiON. Vectors cannot be 'measured'. Vectors can only be 'imagined' BETWEEN TWO coordinate positions (located on ANY path). ANY OTHER TWO points, on the SAME path, will constitute ANOTHER imaginary VECTOR ..even though these OTHER TWO vector points are ALSO on the SAME PATH.!! THEREFORE any 'momentum UNCERTAiNTY' for ANY particle 'decreases' with any 'increase' in the STRAiGHTNESS of the particle's path.!! o o o o o o o vector o o o projection A - - - VELOCiTY vector - - B - - - - - C o o o o o o o o ANY path. Note velocity (A-B) / t is independent of the speed (A~~B) / t.!! Again, ANY OTHER 'imagined' VELOCiTY BETWEEN any OTHER TWO points (each located on the SAME path) will indicate a DiFFERENT VELOCiTY VECTOR, ..albiet, even though that SAME path DOES NOT CHANGE.!! Where-as PRE-REQUiRED vector of Momentum POSiTiON A is known, the PRE-REQUiRED pre-vector-POSiTiON B on the path is ARBiTRARY ..and NOT, and indeed CANNOT BE 'conjugate' of the SUBSEQUENT momentum. A Momentum VELOCiTY VECTOR is DiRECTLY DEPENDENT on POSiTiON B, .. ..and, therefore, CANNOT be 'conjugate'.!! Vector PROjECTiON is independent of POSiTiON B on a STRAiGHT path. Vectors and VECTOR PROjECTiONs are ALWAYS STRAiGHT, like a CHORD, (..BETWEEN ANY TWO coordinate positions A & B located on ANY path). A VECTOR is the ‘ONLY' path BETWEEN ADjACENT POiNTs on ANY path.!! THEREFORE, any NON-zero GR-Tivity QUANTA could ONLY ever have been the 'AFFiNE gaps BETWEEN ADjACENT POiNTs', mathematically speaking. |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle | Guy Macon | Physics - General Discussion | 70 | October 2nd 04 02:33 AM |
| Pauli Excl Principle inverse of 2nd Law Thermodynamics andHeisenberg Uncertainty P. inverse of Fusion Barrier Principle | Archimedes Plutonium | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | September 3rd 04 09:01 AM |
| uncertainty principle equality | Paul | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | August 31st 04 07:33 AM |
| Hisenberg Uncertainty Principle - Uncertainty over h/(2*pi) & h/(4*pi) | abs | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | July 3rd 04 09:50 AM |
| Uncertainty principle questions. | Patrick Powers | Physics - General Discussion | 45 | June 4th 04 01:06 PM |