The following link is the home page for Model Mechanics. The following
papers are included in this link:
1. Unification of Physics.
2. Cosmology Based on Absolute Motion.
3. Proposed Experiments to Detect Absolute Motion.

http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/2005home.pdf

Enjoy,
Ken Seto

A Physics Booklist: Recommendations from the Net
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic.../booklist.html

I will not be paying money or reading Ken Seto's
description of cells, quantum theory, consciousness,
and the universe, since what he posts for free at
this newsgroup has an extraordinarily large negative
value.

"Perspicacious" wrote in message
oups.com...
I will not be paying money or reading Ken Seto's
description of cells, quantum theory, consciousness,
and the universe, since what he posts for free at
this newsgroup has an extraordinarily large negative
value.


Hey **** head .....no body is asking you to buy my book. My theory is
light-years ahead of yours which is based on the bogus concept that two
photons circumnavigate the universe and meet again.

kenseto wrote:
"Perspicacious" wrote in message
oups.com...

I will not be paying money or reading Ken Seto's
description of cells, quantum theory, consciousness,
and the universe, since what he posts for free at
this newsgroup has an extraordinarily large negative
value.



Hey **** head .....no body is asking you to buy my book. My theory is
light-years ahead of yours which is based on the bogus concept that two
photons circumnavigate the universe and meet again.



Seto's "theory" is empirically contradicted.

Observations and measurement show that the speed of light is constant.

The wavelength is function of photon energy
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Photon.html

lambda = h/E

The wavelength is shifted due to the relative radial velocity between
source and observer. Shifts in spectral emission and absorption lines
for various elements and molecules (Doppler shift) allows the
determination of relative radial velocity between source and observer.

See: Doppler Effect
http://scienceworld.wolfram.co m/physics/DopplerEffect.html

Standard tool in the Astrophysics community.

"Sam Wormley" wrote in message
news:Ns_Pe.284449$x96.5396@attbi_s72...
kenseto wrote:
"Perspicacious" wrote in message
oups.com...

I will not be paying money or reading Ken Seto's
description of cells, quantum theory, consciousness,
and the universe, since what he posts for free at
this newsgroup has an extraordinarily large negative
value.



Hey **** head .....no body is asking you to buy my book. My theory is
light-years ahead of yours which is based on the bogus concept that two
photons circumnavigate the universe and meet again.



Seto's "theory" is empirically contradicted.

How would you know wormy? You are a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR

Ken Seto


Observations and measurement show that the speed of light is constant.

The wavelength is function of photon energy
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Photon.html

lambda = h/E

The wavelength is shifted due to the relative radial velocity between
source and observer. Shifts in spectral emission and absorption lines
for various elements and molecules (Doppler shift) allows the
determination of relative radial velocity between source and observer.

See: Doppler Effect
http://scienceworld.wolfram.co m/physics/DopplerEffect.html

Standard tool in the Astrophysics community.

"Mommy, I want a system for Christmas."

"Oh, how nice, my little demon child. What type of system do you
want????"

"A system! A system! I dont wan't to have to specify any certain type
of system, I JUST WANT A SYSTEM DOG-GONE IT."

"Ok, Lil darling, we'll get a system for ewe."

"Thank you, Mommy. You're a brick. Back into the dark broom-closet
now?"

'Yes my little darling child. You get back out in a week."

Sam Wormley wrote:

[snip]


Observations and measurement show that the speed of light is constant.

[snip]

references please. so we can finally remove the constancy of the speed
of light as an AXIOM of SR and turn it into an empirical principle.

hey stoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopid, the constancy of
the speed of light is a highly speculative axiom. it cannot be proven
in the context of SR using any kind of experiment due to the way the
theory is setup and clocks/rulers are used to treat simultaneity.

hey stooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopid , i am waiting to
see a paper that validates the axiom of the constancy of the one-way
speed of light.


hey stoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopi d, the constancy
of the speed of light is a counterintuitive principle and has severe
implications regarding the nature of physwical reality, if it is true,
implications which you do not understand.

Plonk

Mike

Mike:

Sam Wormley wrote:

[snip]


Observations and measurement show that the speed of light is constant.

[snip]

references please. so we can finally remove the constancy of the speed
of light

Which experiment has shown otherwise.

as an AXIOM of SR and turn it into an empirical principle.

Since that postulate is unnecssary to derive special relativity,
why would it make any difference?

hey stoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopid, the constancy of
the speed of light is a highly speculative axiom. it cannot be proven
in the context of SR using any kind of experiment due to the way the
theory is setup and clocks/rulers are used to treat simultaneity.

There's nothing speculative about it. Which experiment has ever
shown a non-constant speed of light? Which experiments contradict
maxwell's equations? Which experiments show that frequency x wavelength
in vacuum is not a constant?

hey stooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopid , i am waiting to
see a paper that validates the axiom of the constancy of the one-way
speed of light.

I'm waiting to see an explanation of the physics that would
distinguish between a round trip speed of light and differing
one-way speeds that amounts to more than mental masturbation
and/or doesn't contradict observations.

hey stoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopi d, the constancy
of the speed of light is a counterintuitive principle and has severe

I didn't realize that nature was obligated to be intuitive,
especially if you go out of your way to avoid the intuition.

implications regarding the nature of physwical reality, if it is true,
implications which you do not understand.

Naturally, there are implications. Charge conservation is one such
implication. Since no one has ever observed a process in which charge
is not conserved, a constant speed of light is feature.

"Bilge" wrote in message
...
Mike:


hey stooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopid , i am waiting to
see a paper that validates the axiom of the constancy of the one-way
speed of light.

I'm waiting to see an explanation of the physics that would
distinguish between a round trip speed of light and differing
one-way speeds that amounts to more than mental masturbation
and/or doesn't contradict observations.

Then how come physicists refused to do any one-way light speed experiments
to quiet the critics down?? How come that physicists only do one-way
isotropic experiments? Why don't they give us the value of one-way light
speed for these experiments?

Ken Seto

Ken Seto

Ken Seto