On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:43:48 GMT, "Brian Fletcher"
wrote:


[Hammond]
You seem to be unaware that the scientific explanation ("proof") of
the existence of God has been discovered, experimentally proven,
and published in the peer reviewed scientific literature.

Hammond G.E.(2003) A Semiclassical Theory of God
Noetic Journal, Vol 4(3) July 2003, pp 231-244(Noetic Press)
Online copy at:
http://geocities.com/scientific_proo...ammond5s1.html



I am however aware of the limits of scentific explaination, and also know of
eminent scientists who would disagree with such 'findings'
BrianOfLife

[Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.

Any "eminent scientist" who wuld dare to say that I haven't
rigorously and indisputably scientifically proven the existence
of God (in fact the God of the Bible) can be easily shown
to be a scientific incompetent, if not a fool..
In fact, one "wannabee eminent physicist", namely Prof. Chris
Isham (Imperial College, Theoretical Physics Group) actually tried
it... and ended up looking like an incompetent who knew so little
about "God" that he brazenly mistook me for a "kook" and presumed
to try and insult me witiouteven taking the precaution of actually
reading the (published) theory. Hence he thereby clumbsily "blew
his cover" and exposed himself as being nothing more than an
aggravated and hostile academic pedagogue.... which in fact is what
he actually is (the record shows). An "eminent" scientist would have
known better than to be so brazenly incautious!

In the meantime, "really eminent" scientists, such as the handful
of Nobel Laureate physicists on the Pontifical Academy of
Sciences, or even Msgr. Lorenzo Albacete (also PhD physics, and
noted personal friend of Pope Paul II), or such people as Sir John
Polkinghorne (PhD physics) and ordained Anglican Priest are completely
UNAWARE of this discovery... specifically because such academic louts
as Chris Isham (who knows Sir John personally) are so insanely JEALOUS
and ENVIOUS of an unknown like myself of making such a historic
discovery that they will take every opportunity to try and suppress
my work... even going as far as to publicly get on Usenet and try to
encourage the long list of pseudointellectyual Internet kooks who
have been heckling me.

So much for your "eminent scientists"....


========================================
SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
mirror site:
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
=======================================
Join COSA church (Church of the Scientific Advent)
Send a blank email to
and your email address will be added to the
COSA discussion list (free, no obligation)
===========================
and please ask your news service to add:
alt.sci.relativistic-proof-of-god.moderated
===========================

"George Hammond" wrote in message
...
[Hammond]
Unsupported assertion.

You dont even understand what this means do you?

Any "eminent scientist" who wuld dare to say that I haven't
rigorously and indisputably scientifically proven the existence
of God (in fact the God of the Bible) can be easily shown
to be a scientific incompetent, if not a fool..

Nonsense. Not to mention your spelling....


my work... even going as far as to publicly get on Usenet and try to
encourage the long list of pseudointellectyual Internet kooks who
have been heckling me.

Deluded, paranoid George.