A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , ,

To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Perspicacious
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 465
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"

There was another word in the 16th century that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. The word was "heretic."

You really do need to recognize your mindless rage and
honestly confront your medieval mind. If you can attain
that, then learn math next and recognize your obsession
with deceit. Try to reform. Aim to be honest. Becoming
marginally civilized will improve your sour disposition.

Time is homogeneous. It possesses an indistinguishable
sameness everywhere, point by point, across all inertial
frames of reference. There are no fatal flaws in
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf

Ads
  #2  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Bill Hobba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,197
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"


"Perspicacious" wrote in message
oups.com...
There was another word in the 16th century that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. The word was "heretic."

You really do need to recognize your mindless rage and
honestly confront your medieval mind. If you can attain
that, then learn math next and recognize your obsession
with deceit. Try to reform. Aim to be honest. Becoming
marginally civilized will improve your sour disposition.

Time is homogeneous. It possesses an indistinguishable
sameness everywhere, point by point, across all inertial
frames of reference. There are no fatal flaws in
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf


It is incredible how these sick cranks can blatantly assert what post after
post has shown is false. But to change from when he posted under Eugene
Schubert would probably be too much to ask. As Tom Roberts said about you
in 2004
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...77fdaf88251f90
'he ignored everything I said and foists his own opinion on the reader.'

Seek help.

Bill




  #3  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Eric Gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,701
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"


Perspicacious wrote:
There was another word in the 16th century that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. The word was "heretic."


That does not mean it applies to you. The only reason people want to
see you burn at the stake is because they want to see you finally shut
the hell up.


You really do need to recognize your mindless rage and
honestly confront your medieval mind. If you can attain
that, then learn math next and recognize your obsession
with deceit. Try to reform. Aim to be honest. Becoming
marginally civilized will improve your sour disposition.


Who are you talking to? People unfamiliar with your constant whining
would be confused.


Time is homogeneous. It possesses an indistinguishable
sameness everywhere, point by point, across all inertial
frames of reference. There are no fatal flaws in
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf


You assume the form of the Lorentz transforms, and call it a
derivation. You still do not understand.

  #4  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Sam Wormley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,689
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says"Idiot"

Perspicacious wrote:
There was another word in the 16th century that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. The word was "heretic."

You really do need to recognize your mindless rage and
honestly confront your medieval mind. If you can attain
that, then learn math next and recognize your obsession
with deceit. Try to reform. Aim to be honest. Becoming
marginally civilized will improve your sour disposition.

Time is homogeneous. It possesses an indistinguishable
sameness everywhere, point by point, across all inertial
frames of reference. There are no fatal flaws in
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf


Time is malleable--being affected by gravitation and
velocity.
  #5  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Y.Porat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,286
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"

See my third or fifth postulate (i forgot the number (:-)
and stick it once and for all to your mind:


Time is nothing but motion or translation *comparison* to some agreed
motion or translation reference'

it is a human artifact not natures creation

it is not an independent physical entity
like for instance mass or distance
and i always bring the following thinking experiment that i did while i
was less than 16 years:

suppose that a certain point of your reference motion- it will stop
for say one billion years
now at the same point of motion - not only that object will stop moving
but----
all mater in our universe will stop completely its motion
(that includes the electrons in your brain etc etc - complete
universal stop
and then after a billion years all of the previous motion will start
simultaneously (it will start motion as it was before without relative
translation of the start point
now the question is ;
will you notice those 'billion years that 'has passed ''???

no more questions !!
full stop.......for once and for all and not any 'time wast' about
that issue
btw i demand a copyright about the above notion and example. and
explanation ....

another btw i guess that my new spell checker is doing miracles for
me (:-)
sorry to forget the mane of the person who introduced it to me !

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------

  #6  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
macromitch@internetCDS.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 927
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"

Time is more than a physical concept it is a
measuarable physical quantity.

It goes slower in some places than in others.
All you have to do Porat is to move into it.

Time is spread out in space.

Period.

  #7  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
tdp1001@gmail.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 985
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"


Sam Wormley wrote:
Perspicacious wrote:
There was another word in the 16th century that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. The word was "heretic."

You really do need to recognize your mindless rage and
honestly confront your medieval mind. If you can attain
that, then learn math next and recognize your obsession
with deceit. Try to reform. Aim to be honest. Becoming
marginally civilized will improve your sour disposition.

Time is homogeneous. It possesses an indistinguishable
sameness everywhere, point by point, across all inertial
frames of reference. There are no fatal flaws in
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf


Time is malleable--being affected by gravitation and
velocity.



Time is the only thing that is NOT malleable.

A measurement consists of two parts,
some standard unit,
and the number of these standard units
that make up the measurement.

ALL physics properties are referenced to
whatever is selected as the standard time reference.

The standard time reference provides the ticks
that quantize time. Times are time periods which are auto-correlations
associated with some single point.

The standard time reference provides the ticks
that quantize time intervals.

Time intervals are the most fundamental measurement of spaces.
Einstein rulers are nasty temperature sensitive, pressure sensitive,
bending sensitive, contamination sensitive, acceleration sensitive
beasts.

Spaces are time intervals
which are cross-correlations associated with two points,
one being called the cause or initial point,
and the other being called the effect or end point.

Time intervals are commonly multiplied by a constant "C"
and called spaces. As can be seen, "C" can be ANY value you like, as
all it does is differentiate between time periods and time
intervals.The selection of "C" is a political process,
and commonly selected to express time intervals
in terms of some kings body parts.

Masses are aggregates of time periods (Times)
and time intervals (Spaces).

mass(object A) * G / C^3 = time interval(mass(object B))^3 / time
period(Common to both objects)^2

As can be seen G/C^3 is a universal time per mass constant.

In addition to possessing the mechanical properties
of mass, energy, momentum, etc. aggregates of time periods and time
intervals also possess the electrical properties of capacitance and
inductance.

"G", the "conductivity" of space ( G(space) = 1 / Z(space)
is the constant used to express aggregates of time periods and time
intervals in the electrical domain just as "C" is used to express time
intervals in the space domain, and "C" and "G" are used to express
time/space aggregates in the mass domain.

The following charts demonstrate these relationships:

The chart below shows expresses the properties in the time/space
domain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
l' t[p]' acceleration
vel' One vel
g' t[p] distance
t[p]^2

Note that the acceleration of the Earth is called "g",
and that t[p] (Time periods) are functions of distance and "g".

time period^2 = distance / acceleration

The chart below shows expresses the properties in time domain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
t[i]' t[p]' g / C
r' One r
C / g t[p] t[i]

t[p] = time period
t[i] = time interval
r = time interval / time period

The chart below shows expresses the properties in the electrical
domain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
C' t[p]' L'
Z One Z^-1
L t[p] C

C = capacitance
L = Inductance
Z = Impedance

Note that t[p] (Time periods) are functions of inductance and
capacitance.

time period^2 = L * C

Be advised that as time periods are commonly expressed
in both cycles and in radians, it is necessary to use the
constant (2 * pi) to get the numerical result in the desired units.

It is my personal opinion that ALL properties should be expressed in
integer units based on cycles, and that the physical units that have
been contaminated with radians should be redefined.

If all properties are referenced to cycle counts,
there will only be an unambiguous plus or minus one count error,
whereas the use of radians introduces real numbers,
with the resultant ambiguity.

To sum up,
note that times are the count of ticks of the standard clock
and that time periods are auto-correlations associated with a single
point, and that time intervals are cross-correlations associated with
two points, and that the mass domain and electrical domain properties
are composites of time periods and time intervals.

In other words,
it is wasteful, confusing, and non-viable
to use models and equations promoted by
race, religion and nationality,
and to twist all of the succeeding properties
that are based on simple, quantum, integer counts
of a standard clock.

General Relativity is a Tower of Babel
that twists time domain, mass domain and electrical domain properties.

It generates more heat than light,
and wastes time, money and minds
on such pursuits as time travel, worm holes, black holes,
bending, warping and dragging space, etc.

Basically GR was an effort to extend stress analysis maths and theories
to the larger universe, but as the universe is more like a dynamic gas,
than it is like a solid, bound body, it is not viable to use these
techniques to model the larger universe.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

  #8  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Sam Wormley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,689
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says"Idiot"

wrote:

Time is the only thing that is NOT malleable.


Spoken like a true crank, potter
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22To...Awww.crank.net

Perhaps you'll retort with something personal about me, eh Potter?
  #9  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
GeekBoy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"


"Perspicacious" wrote in message
oups.com...
There was another word in the 16th century that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. The word was "heretic."

You really do need to recognize your mindless rage and
honestly confront your medieval mind. If you can attain
that, then learn math next and recognize your obsession
with deceit. Try to reform. Aim to be honest. Becoming
marginally civilized will improve your sour disposition.

Time is homogeneous. It possesses an indistinguishable
sameness everywhere, point by point, across all inertial
frames of reference. There are no fatal flaws in
http://www.everythingimportant.org/r...ty/special.pdf


Would that be Einsteinspammer?


  #10  
Old August 19th 05 posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
Y.Porat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,286
Default To the Idiot too Stupid to Debate Math Concepts and only says "Idiot"

i dont see any contradiction between waht you said and waht i said
(unless you ddint undestood waht i said and i said it in the
simpestshortest
possible way!)

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz@hotmail.com Physics - General Discussion 17 February 22nd 05 09:26 PM
Beware of IDIOT UNCLE AL guskz@hotmail.com Physics - General Discussion 4 February 21st 05 05:04 PM
Idiot-on-board alert. jmfbahciv@aol.com Physics - General Discussion 6 December 17th 04 12:48 PM
A Simple Little Uncle idiot Henri Wilson Physics - General Discussion 18 January 4th 04 03:15 AM
Relativistic idiot tj Frazir Physics - General Discussion 0 August 2nd 03 11:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Refinance - Problem Mortgage - Loans - Refinance - Secured Loans