Hi Geeman ,
You ask : " Is there one who will say , ' Yay ? ' "


John A. Bailo is your man .

He's always looking for quality investments like this one .

But you better hurry ,
No telling how long his money will last .

He say " 1 ... and 1 ... and 1 ... is 3 . "


" He wear no shoe shine . He got toe jam football .
He got monkey finger . He shoot co-ca cola .
He say ' I know you . You know me . '
One thing I can tell you is ' You got to be free . '

Come together ... Right now ... Over me . "

-- Beatles
http://www.Jauko.NL/tot/tab/b/beatles/come_to.htm

Jeff Relf wrote in message ...
Hi John John John ,
You ask :
" Did you see that Twilight Zone episode ? "


How do you remember all these Twilight Zone episodes ?
You must have the Sci-Fi channel .
I haven't had a TV for about 15 years now .


Even if you hadn't had a TV in 30 years, you still might have seen the
particular episode he's referring too!

Double-A

Jeff Relf wrote in message ...

I'm sure that QM is Very correct .

The Copenhagen Interpretation is _ Fairly _ correct .

The CI should replace the word " Measurement "
with the word " Biased perception " .

For some of J.S. Bell's thoughts on this see :


It is true that the Copenhagen Interpretation has its
problems. But for practical purposes, when two parts
of a state drift far enough away from each other that
there is no way for them to come back together,
speaking of "collapse of the wave function" is an
extremely good approximation. I lean towards the
many-worlds interpretation a bit myself, but I
haven't really made up my mind, and perhaps I never
will. But that is of little importance. The world
we can see, feel, and touch includes pure chance
events. This is a well-established fact. Nothing
is ever proven, of course, but this is pretty well
established. Especially with the entanglement
experiments.

On 9 Sep 2003 04:36:45 -0700, (Geeman) wrote:


"Wake up! - Time to die!"

whupz. already did that

Again, for the Naysayers:
http://www.geocities.com/warpcore91/Warp_drive.html
Is there one who will say, "Yay?"

eh...

First question:
If all the energized surfaces are encased in asphalt or tar,
is the "ionic wind" explanation valid?
If built this way, doesn't it constitute a "vacuum test"
by it's very composition?

the K constant needz to be way-more. more juice, too

plus magnetic field propulsion workz thru this ****

my pappa already been there tried that. **** magnetz

....the NIB **** I got now would blow him away. 1 Tesla

and I've seen 3 Tesla wiggler assemblies for sale

Second Question:
If you don't build it, how can you dismiss it?

it seemz that karma also deliverz partz and URLz

but I'm onto some inert gas aether bioelectric beamer ****

....and instead of using a xenon flash tube, I can uze a sphere

just exite it with the output of the microwave stereo-killer

since the strange **** don't care if therez solid stuff in the
way, a nifty copper screen over the biznezz-end will keep
microwaves ofa-ya, and if the sphere explodes, no shrapnel

I just hate having to defleckt HID-tube shrapnel away from my face

....just becauze I can do it don't mean I hafta ****en like it

Hi Jim , [ ghytrfvbnmju7654 ]
You say :
" But that is of little importance .
The world we can see , feel ,
and touch includes pure chance events . "


The likely hood of absolute material determinism
is not important ?

First , Absolute material determinism
is not not Not " Scientific determinism " .

Second , If absolute material determinism
were not true then learning about nature would be futile .

Third , This means that all
randomness , entropy , and even free will are :
Fake , Artificial , and Biased .

Hi Double-A ,
About the The Twilight Zone . You say :
" Even if you hadn't had a TV in 30 years ,
you still might have seen the particular episode
he's referring too ! "


Assuming you haven't seen any of them recently ,
how well do you remember them ?

(Geeman) wrote in message . com...
^.^ wrote in message ...
On 8 Sep 2003 17:15:44 -0700, (john bailo)
wrote:

Then she wakes up and it's all a dream, the earth is actually
moving away from the sun and it's deathly cold.

**** happens

That's what are you naysaying physicists remind me of.

One day it's heat, the other day it's cold.

I say goto heaven. goto hell. (tm. Roy - BladeRunner.dvx)

"Wake up! - Time to die!"

Talk sense! Take a lesson from me.

Yes, I saw that Twilight Zone episode. It was a variation of The Day
The Earth Caught Fire. Fab movie of four giant hydrogen bomb tests
that knock the Earth off its axis, and (worse still) cause it to
slowly spiral into the Sun.

Jeff Relf wrote in message ...
Hi Jim , [ ghytrfvbnmju7654 ]
You say :
" But that is of little importance .
The world we can see , feel ,
and touch includes pure chance events . "


The likely hood of absolute material determinism
is not important ?

First , Absolute material determinism
is not not Not " Scientific determinism " .

Second , If absolute material determinism
were not true then learning about nature would be futile .

Third , This means that all
randomness , entropy , and even free will are :
Fake , Artificial , and Biased .

And absolute determinism isn't biased?

W

Wordsmith wrote:

And absolute determinism isn't biased?

Those who claim it rational forget that at times
the universe is irrational.