A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , ,

The three fundamental Variables and two fundamental Constants of mechanics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 3rd 05 posted to alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.math
Don1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,196
Default The three fundamental Variables and two fundamental Constants of mechanics


Since there are really only 3 fundamental Variables in mechanics: Force
(f), [& weight (w)]; displacement (s), and time(t); this simplifies
acceleration to [a=2s/t^2]; so that the ratios w/g=f/a are also
simplified to wt^2/s = ft^2/s: These _ratios_ are the long sought
fundamental Constants of mechanics: 'Gravitational mass' (w/g), and
'Inertial mass' (f/a).

To simplify writing the equations. we'll use the following
abbreviations: Symbol # to abbreviate 1 pound, the symbol ' to
abbreviate 1 foot, and the symbol sec^2 to abbreviate 1 second
squared:

Therefo w/g=f/a; becomes: wt^2/s = ft^2/s = 1# sec^2/1'=2#
sec^2/2'=3# sec^2/3'= 4# sec^2/4';; up to thousands of pounds, or more.
[For the moon; the ratio of w/g is 5.53# sec^2/5.53 feet; for the
Earth; w/g is 32.174# sec^2/32.174feet.]

Notice that the units [pounds(#), seconds(sec), and feet(')] cancel;
leaving ONE pound second squared, per foot: Therefo ONE#
sec^2/'=wt^2/s=ft^2/s; applies anywhere, and (these ratios) are the
long sought constants of physics.

Don

Ads
  #2  
Old July 4th 05 posted to alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.math
Dylan Sung
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default The three fundamental Variables and two fundamental Constants of mechanics


"Don1" wrote in message
oups.com...

Since there are really only 3 fundamental Variables in mechanics: Force
(f), [& weight (w)]; displacement (s), and time(t); this simplifies
acceleration to [a=2s/t^2]; so that the ratios w/g=f/a are also


Have you thought in which direction the forces are acting in?

For a body (a point mass) on a horizontal frictionless surface, at rest,
it's weight force w=mg will be at normal N to the ground, therefore there
are no horizontal components of force due to the weight for this point mass.

That is, for x axis representing the horizontal plane, N_x = 0, N_y = mg

Even if the body moves along the frictionless horizontal surface, N_x = 0,
since mg is always normal to this surface. Therefore you can't equate mg
with the f=ma at all.

Dyl.


  #3  
Old July 4th 05 posted to alt.sci.physics,sci.physics,sci.math
yt56erd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 671
Default The three fundamental Variables and two fundamental Constants of mechanics



Don1 wrote:
Since there are really only 3 fundamental Variables in mechanics: Force
(f), [& weight (w)]; displacement (s), and time(t); this simplifies
acceleration to [a=2s/t^2]; so that the ratios w/g=f/a are also
simplified to wt^2/s = ft^2/s: These _ratios_ are the long sought
fundamental Constants of mechanics: 'Gravitational mass' (w/g), and
'Inertial mass' (f/a).

To simplify writing the equations. we'll use the following
abbreviations: Symbol # to abbreviate 1 pound, the symbol ' to
abbreviate 1 foot, and the symbol sec^2 to abbreviate 1 second
squared:

Therefo w/g=f/a; becomes: wt^2/s = ft^2/s = 1# sec^2/1'=2#
sec^2/2'=3# sec^2/3'= 4# sec^2/4';; up to thousands of pounds, or more.
[For the moon; the ratio of w/g is 5.53# sec^2/5.53 feet; for the
Earth; w/g is 32.174# sec^2/32.174feet.]

Notice that the units [pounds(#), seconds(sec), and feet(')] cancel;
leaving ONE pound second squared, per foot: Therefo ONE#
sec^2/'=wt^2/s=ft^2/s; applies anywhere, and (these ratios) are the
long sought constants of physics.

Don


you are a fool.

your post is perfect example of why the si system is better than the
imperial system.

not to mention your confusion over how forces work.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The fundamental variables of mechanical science Don1 Physics - General Discussion 79 June 26th 05 10:15 PM
time to define the kilogram in terms of fundamental constants Sam Wormley Physics - General Discussion 14 March 9th 05 11:51 PM
fundamental forces dedaNoe Physics - General Discussion 2 July 22nd 04 06:34 PM
Article: Fundamental physics constants stay put Robert Karl Stonjek Physics - General Discussion 0 June 24th 04 11:14 PM
Alternate Fundamental Constants Duncan Borkowski Physics - General Discussion 6 July 15th 03 01:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2010 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Consolidation - Credit Consolidation - Credit Consolidation - Florida Property - Dietary Supplements