![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: dark, energy, harris, impact, matterquot, quotdeep, temple, theory |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deep Impact probe with comet 9P/Tempel 1 is scheduled Sunday evening
(July 3) at 11:00 PM PST (or 2 AM EST on July 4). Friends of mine suggest I wear sunglasses, as conspiracy websites are claiming 9P/Tempel 1 is made of antimatter, and 16,000 megatons can be quite bright. Though maybe not when that far away. COMMENT: Well, 433 Eros certainly wasn't made of antimatter, since we managed to land something on that. What, do the conspiracy people think these things come in different flavors? Or --- duh-- have different layers? I am reminded that the deep impact probe isn't the coolest thing we can do with an asteroid or comet. These things OUGHT to be sweeps for Dark Matter that we can collect. I think we need a drilling mission to the center of some small asteroid. I figure asteroids should sweep up Dark Matter in our neighborhood (and why shouldn't there be some in our solar system?) by gravitationa; influence, and it should collect naturally at the centers, since we know it's non-baryonic and has no interactions with normal matter, except by gravity. Dark Matter should be fun to mess with, if we can get some. Anything on Earth is unreachable at the Earth's center. This month's Scientific American suggests that Dark Matter is the lightest stable "superpartner" particle in supersymmetry theory. That would be something like spin-1 "sneutrinos" or something else equally odd. It certainly won't be anything normal. Hmmm. If the "lightest superpartner" turns out to be the spin-1 counterpart of electrons, or "selectrons," will they be also carry a negative charge? It seems to me they must. Will we then just see some kind of very odd static electricity down there in the middle of comets? It seems to me there's no way that Dark Matter is selectrons balanced out totally in charge with squark sprotons, because sprotons are likely to be way too heavy. So if it's selectrons, they're there alone with nothing to balance them out (the s-antimater would have gone the way of the stuff in our universe, and for the same reason). But big negative charges on all the galaxies should show up worse than gravity, as a repulsive force. Hey--- maybe "dark energy" is just repulsion from some selectrons!! But there can't be many of them (certainly not enough to account for Dark Matter or the repulsion would be far more than we see for Dark energy), so sneutrinos is what we're (mostly) left with. SBH |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" wrote in message ups.com... Deep Impact probe with comet 9P/Tempel 1 is scheduled Sunday evening (July 3) at 11:00 PM PST (or 2 AM EST on July 4). Friends of mine suggest I wear sunglasses, as conspiracy websites are claiming 9P/Tempel 1 is made of antimatter, and 16,000 megatons can be quite bright. Though maybe not when that far away. Its ok. I think its a safe bet that it isn't made of antimatter..... |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" wrote:
Deep Impact probe with comet 9P/Tempel 1 is scheduled Sunday evening (July 3) at 11:00 PM PST (or 2 AM EST on July 4). Friends of mine suggest I wear sunglasses, as conspiracy websites are claiming 9P/Tempel 1 is made of antimatter, and 16,000 megatons can be quite bright. [snip] Idiot. No 511 keV annihalation radiation from the solar wind. Hopeless, clueless, ****ing imbecile. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
They were kidding, Al.
In any case, it's not the absense of positrons in primary high energy galactic cosmic rays (GCR) and associated anihillation radiation that convinces us there's no antimatter out there (at least in our own galaxy). Because in fact such rays contain not only positrons but anti-protons as well, and these come from outside the atmosphere, as shown in balloon and space collection studies. Unfortunately these can be, an probably are, produced by proton-proton collisions in the interstellar medium. It's the absense of anti-nuclei *heavier than hydrogen* in GCR that is the real clue. Just thought you might like to know. And if you were calling *me* an idiot, that's not safe. Not if you want to continue posting here, because I will make you pay for it. SBH |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Iranians working on "dark energy." | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | August 14th 04 01:55 AM |
| Is Dark Energy Actually the "Mega-Quantum?" | David Stinson | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 31st 04 06:07 PM |
| Cal APS UCB Nov 14-15 2003 "Dark Energy" | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | November 14th 03 07:03 PM |
| "Astronomers claim dark matter breakthrough" | -Peter Ramsey | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | October 3rd 03 12:51 AM |
| magnetic monopoles vs quantization of electric charge (was: Dark Matter vs Dark Energy) | Jonathan Thornburg | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 15 | August 23rd 03 09:05 PM |