![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: education, fundamental, problem, science |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
See the beginning of Chapter 4 in Bryan Wallace's book:
http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm : "Marilyn vos Savant is listed in the "Guinness Book of World Records" under highest IQ and publishes an "Ask Marilyn" column in the Sunday Newspaper Magazine PARADE. In the May 22, 1988 issue, Jennifer W. Webster of Slidell, La. asks: What one discovery or event would prove all or most of modern scientific theory wrong? Marilyn replies: Here's one of each. If the speed of light were discovered not to be a constant, modern scientific theory would be devastated. And if a divine creation could be proved to have occurred, modern scientists would be devastated. I suspect that Marilyn has hit the nail on the head. Einstein's special relativity theory with his second postulate that the speed of light in space is constant is the linchpin that holds the whole range of modern physics theories together. Shatter this postulate, and modern physics becomes an elaborate farce!" Curious isn't it? But not VERY curious since the initiated have known about the falsity of the second postulate for quite a long time. The fundamental problem the initiated have been trying to resolve for the last 20 or so years is: How do I get rid of Einsteinian idiocy without losing my salary? Since the same people are dominant in education, that is a fundamental problem of education as well. Pentcho Valev |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The discovery of new chemical-physical processes could very well
falsify most of modern physics. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pentcho Valev wrote:
[snip] If the speed of light were discovered not to be a constant, modern scientific theory would be devastated. And if a divine creation could be proved to have occurred, modern scientists would be devastated. [snip] Propose an experiment to reproducibly demonstrate lightspeed has more than one measurable value in vacuum. Tell us which god is the true one/ones. Hindus have 36 crores of gods - 360 million wallet-sucking deities. Begin by posting the list in order of likelihood. The Japanese believe reality was created by two gods ****ing; an act of coitus interruptus spurted out the universe. Blacks pretty much believe anything - Southern Baptists and Black History. Only the Vatican is flop-sweating. Benny-16's training as Hitlerjunge will serve him well. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Or not.
Most of 'modern physics' has been very well substantiated with empirical data. It is possible that new data could lead to subtle re-interpretations of some of the old data, but you are not going to find any new quantum states of atoms or to change the speed of light measurably. Tom Davidson Richmond, VA |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Here's how they will discover the next scientific breakthrough. In addition to electric field and magnetic field. They will find out there is a third field lurking within them. This third field can become very apparent when you cancel the magnetic field vectors producing the so called Scalar Wave. But this is not all. The third field uses holographic representation and has non-local dynamics. It could be manifestations of the Aether, or 5D Kaluza Klein energy or quantum vacuum hidden richness. Since it couples to electromagnetism. This explains why all matter has this scalar signature that we sensitives can perceive easily and the mechanism behind the successes of NAET (www.naet.com) for example, where the patients reactivity to the substance is treated by making the scalar field of the body and the substance compatible. This can affect mass cells receptor-antigen interlinking process which is related to this holographic third field in the body. The physics of it will come in many 20-50 years. If some of you experts can work on it. It's coming within a decade. p6 |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pentcho Valev wrote:
snip "Marilyn vos Savant is listed in the "Guinness Book of World Records" under highest IQ and publishes an "Ask Marilyn" column in the Sunday Newspaper Magazine PARADE. In the May 22, 1988 issue, Jennifer W. Webster of Slidell, La. asks: Getting information on science from Parade Magazine is like asking your gardener for a medical advice. snip -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The fundamental variables of mechanical science | Don1 | Physics - General Discussion | 79 | June 26th 05 10:15 PM |
| problem of "pseudo-science" and its followers on internet | Dani | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | December 19th 04 07:59 PM |
| Fundamental Misconception about Science #1 | Patrick Reany | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 11th 04 05:43 PM |
| Fundamental Misconception about Science #1 | Patrick Reany | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 11th 04 05:43 PM |
| If science education had done its job right | Patrick Reany | Physics - General Discussion | 67 | November 1st 03 04:56 PM |