A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

Fundamental problem of science education



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 23rd 05 posted to sci.physics
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,858
Default Fundamental problem of science education

See the beginning of Chapter 4 in Bryan Wallace's book:

http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm :

"Marilyn vos Savant is listed in the "Guinness Book of World Records"
under highest IQ and publishes an "Ask Marilyn" column in the Sunday
Newspaper Magazine PARADE. In the May 22, 1988 issue, Jennifer W.
Webster of Slidell, La. asks:
What one discovery or event would prove all or most of modern
scientific theory wrong?
Marilyn replies:
Here's one of each. If the speed of light were discovered not to be a
constant, modern scientific theory would be devastated. And if a divine
creation could be proved to have occurred, modern scientists would be
devastated.
I suspect that Marilyn has hit the nail on the head. Einstein's special
relativity theory with his second postulate that the speed of light in
space is constant is the linchpin that holds the whole range of modern
physics theories together. Shatter this postulate, and modern physics
becomes an elaborate farce!"

Curious isn't it? But not VERY curious since the initiated have known
about the falsity of the second postulate for quite a long time. The
fundamental problem the initiated have been trying to resolve for the
last 20 or so years is: How do I get rid of Einsteinian idiocy without
losing my salary? Since the same people are dominant in education, that
is a fundamental problem of education as well.

Pentcho Valev

Ads
  #2  
Old June 23rd 05 posted to sci.physics
Orion
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 357
Default Fundamental problem of science education

The discovery of new chemical-physical processes could very well
falsify most of modern physics.

  #3  
Old June 23rd 05 posted to sci.physics
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,000
Default Fundamental problem of science education

Pentcho Valev wrote:
[snip]

If the speed of light were discovered not to be a
constant, modern scientific theory would be devastated. And if a divine
creation could be proved to have occurred, modern scientists would be
devastated.

[snip]

Propose an experiment to reproducibly demonstrate lightspeed has more
than one measurable value in vacuum. Tell us which god is the true
one/ones. Hindus have 36 crores of gods - 360 million wallet-sucking
deities. Begin by posting the list in order of likelihood. The
Japanese believe reality was created by two gods ****ing; an act of
coitus interruptus spurted out the universe. Blacks pretty much
believe anything - Southern Baptists and Black History.

Only the Vatican is flop-sweating. Benny-16's training as Hitlerjunge
will serve him well.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
  #4  
Old June 23rd 05 posted to sci.physics
tadchem
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,987
Default Fundamental problem of science education

Or not.

Most of 'modern physics' has been very well substantiated with
empirical data. It is possible that new data could lead to subtle
re-interpretations of some of the old data, but you are not going to
find any new quantum states of atoms or to change the speed of light
measurably.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

  #5  
Old June 24th 05 posted to sci.physics
p6
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 553
Default Fundamental problem of science education


Here's how they will discover the next scientific breakthrough.

In addition to electric field and magnetic field. They will find
out there is a third field lurking within them. This third field
can become very apparent when you cancel the magnetic
field vectors producing the so called Scalar Wave. But this is
not all. The third field uses holographic representation and
has non-local dynamics. It could be manifestations of the
Aether, or 5D Kaluza Klein energy or quantum vacuum
hidden richness. Since it couples to electromagnetism. This
explains why all matter has this scalar signature that we
sensitives can perceive easily and the mechanism behind
the successes of NAET (www.naet.com) for example, where
the patients reactivity to the substance is treated by making
the scalar field of the body and the substance compatible.
This can affect mass cells receptor-antigen interlinking process
which is related to this holographic third field in the body.

The physics of it will come in many 20-50 years. If some of
you experts can work on it. It's coming within a decade.

p6

  #6  
Old June 24th 05 posted to sci.physics
jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,908
Default Fundamental problem of science education

Pentcho Valev wrote:

snip

"Marilyn vos Savant is listed in the "Guinness Book of World Records"
under highest IQ and publishes an "Ask Marilyn" column in the Sunday
Newspaper Magazine PARADE. In the May 22, 1988 issue, Jennifer W.
Webster of Slidell, La. asks:


Getting information on science from Parade Magazine is like asking
your gardener for a medical advice.

snip

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The fundamental variables of mechanical science Don1 Physics - General Discussion 79 June 26th 05 10:15 PM
problem of "pseudo-science" and its followers on internet Dani Physics - General Discussion 3 December 19th 04 07:59 PM
Fundamental Misconception about Science #1 Patrick Reany Physics - General Discussion 0 April 11th 04 05:43 PM
Fundamental Misconception about Science #1 Patrick Reany Physics - General Discussion 0 April 11th 04 05:43 PM
If science education had done its job right Patrick Reany Physics - General Discussion 67 November 1st 03 04:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Debt Consolidation - Free Credit Score - Send Money Online - Mortgages - Loans