![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: atomic, dynamics, electron, proof |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi experts,
What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the atom?? What experiments have been done before that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical stunt?? Zhayne |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
zhayne wrote: Hi experts, What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the atom?? What experiments have been done before that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical stunt?? If you add enough energy to an orbital electron, it escapes the atom altogether. The atom is ionised. I'd say that constitutes getting farther from the nucleus. -Mark Martin |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Martin wrote: zhayne wrote: Hi experts, What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the atom?? What experiments have been done before that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical stunt?? If you add enough energy to an orbital electron, it escapes the atom altogether. The atom is ionised. I'd say that constitutes getting farther from the nucleus. -Mark Martin Not necessarity. Even if the electron is inside the nucleus (as an extreme example). It can still be ejected out of the atom. Therefore your reasoning that just because it is ejected means photonic energy can get it to higher orbitals is faulty. Any empirical proof much like how Rutherford determine the center of the atom has concentrated mass as in nucleus via the alpha scattering of the gold thin foil thing? Perhaps some lasers have been used to probe that photonic energy can indeed make the electron jump to higher orbital or farther away from the nucleus? zhayne |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
zhayne wrote:
Hi experts, What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the atom?? What experiments have been done before that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical stunt?? Rydberg atoms. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"zhayne" wrote in message
oups.com... | Hi experts, | | What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic | energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the | atom?? What experiments have been done before | that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to | higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical | stunt?? Lasers. FrediFizzx http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...uum_charge.pdf or postscript http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...cuum_charge.ps |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
zhayne wrote: Not necessarity. Even if the electron is inside the nucleus (as an extreme example). It can still be ejected out of the atom. Therefore your reasoning that just because it is ejected means photonic energy can get it to higher orbitals is faulty. Any empirical proof much like how Rutherford determine the center of the atom has concentrated mass as in nucleus via the alpha scattering of the gold thin foil thing? Perhaps some lasers have been used to probe that photonic energy can indeed make the electron jump to higher orbital or farther away from the nucleus? Yes, of course. But it's resonable to expect that higher orbital energy raises the electron to a higher radius. At the classical limit that's how things are observed to behave when they are mutually attracted, as with positive & negative charges, and gravitating masses. Since this principle produces reliable numbers that match experiment, it's an overcomplication to propose that it works the other way around as the electron gets to within some very small radius of the nucleus. In order for it to be worthwhile theoretically, it'd have to do a better job of accounting for observables than the present paradigm. As for experiments, I don't know if any Rutherford types have been done to address this very question, and I don't know just offhand how it would be done. -Mark Martin |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Uncle Al wrote: zhayne wrote: Hi experts, What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the atom?? What experiments have been done before that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical stunt?? Rydberg atoms. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf But Rydberg atoms experiments only show spectrum changes. This doesn't prove the electrons are elevated to higher states farther from the atoms. I'm looking for solid proof the electrons indeed jumps to orbitals farther away from the atoms. zhayne |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
FrediFizzx wrote: "zhayne" wrote in message oups.com... | Hi experts, | | What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic | energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the | atom?? What experiments have been done before | that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to | higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical | stunt?? Lasers. FrediFizzx http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...uum_charge.pdf or postscript http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...cuum_charge.ps What's the proof that in lasers, the electrons are all in the top most orbitals or farthest away from the atoms?? I mean, what's the empirical solid data rather than just believing the QM model and mathematics. zhayne |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
"zhayne" wrote in message
oups.com... | | FrediFizzx wrote: | "zhayne" wrote in message | oups.com... | | Hi experts, | | | | What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic | | energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the | | atom?? What experiments have been done before | | that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to | | higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical | | stunt?? | | Lasers. [...] | What's the proof that in lasers, the electrons are all in | the top most orbitals or farthest away from the atoms?? | I mean, what's the empirical solid data rather than just | believing the QM model and mathematics. I don't think anyone has come up with a better model, so why not believe it? Do you have a better model? Or have any references to a better model? FrediFizzx http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...uum_charge.pdf or postscript http://www.vacuum-physics.com/QVC/qu...cuum_charge.ps |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"zhayne" wrote in message oups.com... Hi experts, What's the solid proof that as electrons gain photonic energy. It jumps to higher orbital farther away from the atom?? What experiments have been done before that determined the electrons have indeed jumped to higher orbitals and the model is not just a mathematical stunt?? There aren't any "proofs" in physics. However, that mean atomic radius and excitation energy are co-variable is empirically falsifiable, but it hasn't been falsified. That's it. Short of providing empirical falsification, zhayne has no scientific basis for doubting it. [Old Man] Zhayne |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Misunderstood Electron Dynamics in Atoms (details of how QM is flawed) | Mark Martin | Physics - General Discussion | 10 | April 16th 05 07:06 PM |
| Misunderstood Electron Dynamics in Atoms (details of how QMis flawed) | Repeating Rifle | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | April 9th 05 12:08 AM |
| New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding | franklinhu@yahoo.com | Physics - General Discussion | 121 | March 5th 05 06:55 AM |
| New Cubic Atomic Model explains electron energy levels and bonding | franklinhu@yahoo.com | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | February 4th 05 05:30 PM |
| "Smart's Science" Journal - is part top 14 on list in Atomic Physics ( At Geometry - Online Learning Center for Atomic Physics)... | S. Enterprize Company | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | January 5th 04 06:52 AM |