![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: could, end, humankind, ten, ways |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
That is why we must have human colonies on moon , mars ,
europa and titan and terraform venus as soon as possible , in fact should have been done long ago. guardian.co.uk What a way to go Super-volcano, robotic rebellion or terrorism? Kate Ravilious asks 10 scientists to name the biggest danger to Earth and assesses the chances of it happening Thursday April 14, 2005 The Guardian How will it all end? Some say we are likely to go with a bang, others predict a slow lingering end, while the optimists suggest we will overcome our difficulties by evolving into a different species. According to Sir Martin Rees, author of Our Final Century, astronomer royal and professor of cosmology and astrophysics at the University of Cambridge, humans only have a 50-50 chance of making it through the 21st century without serious setback. "Some natural threats, such as earthquakes and meteorite impacts, remain the same throughout time, while others are aggravated by our modern-interconnected world. But now we also need to consider threats that are human induced." So what are the greatest threats to humans and can we do anything about them? Below, 10 scientists talk about their greatest fears and explain how society could be affected. Afterwards we estimate each threat in two ways: first, the chance of it occurring in our lifetime (the next 70 years); and, second, the danger that it would pose to the human race if it did happen (10 = making humans extinct, to one = barely having an impact on our lives). 1: Climate Change Nick Brooks is a senior research associate at the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of East Anglia: "By the end of this century it is likely that greenhouse gases will have doubled and the average global tempera*ture will have risen by at least 2C. This is hotter than anything the Earth has experienced in the last one and a half million years. In the worst case scenario it could completely alter the climate in many regions of the world. This could lead to global food insecurity and the widespread collapse of existing social systems, causing mass migration and conflict over resources as some parts of the world become much less habitable. I don't think that climate change will sound the death knell for humans, but it certainly has the potential to devastate." Chance of temperatures rising more than 2C (the level considered to be dangerous by the European Union) in the next 70 years: High Danger sco 6 2: Telomere erosion Reinhard Stindl, a medical doctor at the University of Vienna, says every species contains an "evolutionary clock", ticking through the generations and counting down towards an inevitable extinction date: "On the end of every animal's chromosomes are protective caps called telomeres. Without them our chromosomes would become unstable. Each time a cell divides it never quite copies its telomere completely and throughout our lifetime the telomeres become shorter and shorter as the cells multiply. Eventually, when they become critically short, we start to see age-related diseases, such as cancer, Alzheimer's, heart attacks and strokes. "However, it is not just through our lifetime that telomeres get shorter. My theory is that there is a tiny loss of telomere length from one generation to the next, mirroring the process of ageing in individuals. Over thousands of generations the telomere gets eroded down to its critical level. Once at the critical level we would expect to see outbreaks of age-related diseases occurring earlier in life and finally a population crash. Telomere erosion could explain the disappearance of a seemingly successful species, such as Neanderthal man, with no need for external factors such as climate change." Chances of a human population crash due to telomere erosion during the next 70 years: Low Danger sco 8 3: Viral Pandemic Professor Maria Zambon is a virologist and head of the Health Protection Agency's Influenza Laboratory: "Within the last century we have had four major flu epidemics, along with HIV and Sars. Major pandemics sweep the world every century, and it is inevitable that at least one will occur in the future. At the moment the most serious concern is H5 avian influenza in chickens in south-east Asia. If this virus learns to transmit from human to human then it could sweep rapidly around the world. The 1918 influenza outbreak caused 20m deaths in just one year: more than all the people killed in the first world war. A similar outbreak now could have a perhaps more devastating impact. "It is not in the interests of a virus to kill all of its hosts, so a virus is unlikely to wipe out the human race, but it could cause a serious setback for a number of years. We can never be completely prepared for what nature will do: nature is the ultimate bioterrorist." Chance of a viral pandemic in the next 70 years: Very high Danger sco 3 4: Terrorism Professor Paul Wilkinson is chairman of the advisory board for the Centre for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at the University of St Andrews: "Today's society is more vulnerable to terrorism because it is easier for a malevolent group to get hold of the necessary materials, technology and expertise to make weapons of mass destruction. The most likely cause of large scale, mass-casualty terrorism right now is from a chemical or biological weapon. The large-scale release of something like anthrax, the smallpox virus, or the plague, would have a huge effect, and modern communications would quickly make it become a trans-national problem. "In an open society, where we value freedoms of movement, we can't guar*antee stopping an attack, and there is a very high probability that a major attack will occur somewhere in the world, within our lifetimes." Chances of a major terrorist attack in the next 70 years: Very high Danger sco 2 5: Nuclear war Air Marshal Lord Garden is Liberal Democrat defence spokesman and author of Can Deterrence Last?: "In theory, a nuclear war could destroy the human civilisation but in practice I think the time of that danger has probably passed. There are three potential nuclear flashpoints today: the Middle East, India-Pakistan and North Korea. Of these, North Korea is the most worrying, with a hair-trigger, conventional army that might start a war by accident. But I like to believe the barriers against using a nuclear weapon remain high because of the way we have developed an international system to restrain nuclear use. "The probability of nuclear war on a global scale is low, even if there remains the possibility of nuclear use by a rogue state or fanatical extremists." Chance of a global nuclear war in the next 70 years: Low Danger sco 8 6: Meteorite impact Donald Yeomans is manager of Nasa's Near Earth Object Program Office at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California: "Over very long timescales, the risk of you dying as a result of a near-Earth object impact is roughly equivalent to the risk of dying in an aeroplane accident. To cause a serious setback to our civilisation, the impactor would have to be around 1.5km wide or larger. We expect an event of this type every million years on average. The dangers associated with such a large impactor include an enormous amount of dust in the atmosphere, which would substantially shut down sunlight for weeks, thus affecting plant life and crops that sustain life. There would be global firestorms as a result of re-entering hot ejecta and severe acid rain. All of these effects are relatively short-term, so the most adaptable species (cockroaches and humans, for example) would be likely to survive." Chance of the Earth being hit by a large asteroid in the next 70 years: Medium Danger sco 5 7: Robots taking over Hans Moravec is a research professor at Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute in Pittsburgh: "Robot controllers double in complexity (processing power) every year or two. They are now barely at the lower range of vertebrate complexity, but should catch up with us within a half-century. By 2050 I predict that there will be robots with humanlike mental power, with the ability to abstract and generalise. "These intelligent machines will grow from us, learn our skills, share our goals and values, and can be viewed as children of our minds. Not only will these robots look after us in the home, but they will also carry out complex tasks that currently require human input, such as diagnosing illness and recommending a therapy or cure. They will be our heirs and will offer us the best chance we'll ever get for immortality by uploading ourselves into advanced robots." Chance of super-intelligent robots in the next 70 years: High Danger sco 8 8: Cosmic ray blast from exploding star Nir Shaviv is a senior lecturer in physics at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Israel: "Once every few decades a massive star from our galaxy, the Milky Way, runs out of fuel and explodes, in what is known as a supernova. Cosmic rays (high-energy particles like gamma rays) spew out in all directions and if the Earth happens to be in the way, they can trigger an ice age. If the Earth already has a cold climate then an extra burst of cosmic rays could make things really icy and perhaps cause a number of species to become extinct. The Earth is at greatest risk when it passes through a spiral arm of the Milky Way, where most of the supernova occur. This happens approximately every 150m years. Paleoclimate indicators show that there has been a corresponding cold period on Earth, with more ice at the poles and many ice ages during these times. "We are nearly out of the Sagittarius-Carina arm of the Milky Way now and Earth should have a warmer climate in a few million years. But, in around 60m years we will enter the Perseus arm and ice-house conditions are likely to dominate again." Chance of encountering a supernova in the next 70 years: Low Danger sco 4 9: Super-volcanos Professor Bill McGuire is director of the Benfield Hazard Research Centre at University College London and a member of Tony Blair's Natural Hazards working group: "Approximately every 50,000 years the Earth experiences a super-volcano. More than 1,000 sq km of land can be obliterated by pyroclastic ash flows, the surrounding continent is coated in ash and sulphur gases are injected into the atmosphere, making a thin veil of sulphuric acid all around the globe and reflecting back sunlight for years to come. Daytime becomes no brighter than a moonlit night. "The global damage from a super-volcano depends on where it is and how long the gas stays in the atmosphere. Taupo in New Zealand was the most recent super-volcano, around 26,500 years ago. However, the most damaging super-volcano in human history was Toba, on Sumatra, Indonesia, 74,000 years ago. Because it was fairly close to the equator it injected gas quickly into both hemispheres. Ice core data shows that temperatures were dramatically reduced for five to six years afterwards, with freezing conditions right down to the tropics. "A super-volcano is 12 times more likely than a large meteorite impact. There is a 0.15% probability that one will happen in your lifetime. Places to watch now are those that have erupted in the past, such as Yellowstone in the US and Toba. But, even more worryingly, a super-volcano could also burst out from somewhere that has never erupted before, such as under the Amazon rainforest." Chance of a super-volcano in the next 70 years: Very high Danger sco 7 10: Earth swallowed by a black hole Richard Wilson is Mallinckrodt Research Professor of Physics at Harvard University in the US: "Around seven years ago, when the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider was being built at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York, there was a worry that a state of dense matter could be formed that had never been created before. At the time this was the largest particle accelerator to have been built, making gold ions crash head on with immense force. The risk was that this might form a stage that was sufficiently dense to be like a black hole, gathering matter from the outside. Would the Brookhaven labs (and perhaps the entire Earth) end up being swallowed by a black hole created by the new accelerator? "Using the information we already know from black holes in outer space, we did some calculations to find out if the Brookhaven particle accelerator was capable of forming such a black hole. We are now pretty certain this state of matter won't form at Brookhaven and that the Earth won't be swallowed when these particles collide." Chance of Earth being gobbled up by a black hole in the next 70 years: Exceedingly low Danger sco 10 · Naked Science: Clash of crises, is a free event at the Science Museum's Dana Centre on Wednesday April 20. The event is free but tickets should be prebooked on 020 7942 4040 or . Please see www.danacentre.org.uk for full details. You can also take part in the Dana Centre's survey, investigating the nation's biggest fears for the future at www.sciencemuseum.org.uk · What did you think of this article? Mail your responses to and include your name and address. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In sci.physics habshi wrote:
None of this has anything to do with any of the groups you posted to. You are still an idiot. snip non-relevant crap -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:57:48 GMT, habshi wrote:
Thursday April 14, 2005 The Guardian How will it all end? That presupposes a bit too far for my taste, honey. Since when a "Westerner" allows himself to talk about matters of humankind's concern anyway? Go do what you _can_ assholes. What a revelation! All ten scenarios mentioned are bull****. Amazing even the most supposedly brilliant minds among Westerners _always_ miss the obvious when the obvious could mean their own demise and/or degradation, or would point to their stupidity. They're not thinkers, they're jackasses. From "Feynman" who couldn't even put two and two together in some of his observations, to the other couple of hundred professors and degreed beacons of knowledge I came across to know and study and have contempt for, for natural and obvious reasons. Overgrown infants. Do you want to know what's taking you down? Spend _weeks_ and find out what I said about it here in this forum. You'll have to scrutinize ten years of usenet activity. Otherwise quit this ugly show and **** off. -- "Westerners are not 'ignorant'. They're _stupid_." - Maleki |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maleki wrote:
What a revelation! All ten scenarios mentioned are [sic] bull****. [In reference to an article from the April 14, 2005 Guardian.] Obviously, they are NOT all bull**** since some are things that are completely out of anyone's control which can happen at any time. Let's run down the list. 1: Climate Change Life will adapt ... as it did in the other catastrophic mass extinction events. 2: Telomere erosion Fact. All Mammal species (except one) have all the male reproductive machinery on the Y chromosome which -- notwithstanding its ability to recombine -- is already in the process of losing viability. Some species will adapt as the machinery progressively migrates to other parts of the DNA, as has happened numerous times in the past. In one case, this has already happened (a mouse species). In the rest, the male of the species will simply go extinct and, barring the possibility of the species going all-female (all-female species exist), the species will go extinct. 3: Viral Pandemic 1300 is a case in point. Look at the world population estimates at the US Census Bureau or UN sites; also the graph in the Kapitza paper (Figures 1 and 2) reproduced under http://www.federation.g3z.com/Population/Kapitza.htm Interestingly, recent research has shown that the plague (despite being bacterial) is very close in terms of its effects to AIDS and this is being exploited (for instance) with historical research uncovering what was behind those people who showed immunity to the plague, to try and determine a way to engender immunity to AIDS. 4: Terrorism Danger sco 2 It's a topical issue. 5: Nuclear war Danger sco 8 Actually, under 5. 6: Meteorite impact It could happen anytime, anywhere. 7: Robots taking over Cyborgs. Not robots. It will happen. That's not a prediction. It's a promise. 8: Cosmic ray blast from exploding star Another anytime anywhere. We recently had a major blast so intense that it momentarily lit up the entire night sky. 9: Super-volcanos "Approximately every 50,000 years the Earth experiences a super-volcano. Including one c. 70,000 BC which virtually wiped out the human race. Another: anytime anywhere. 10: Earth swallowed by a black hole Would the Brookhaven labs (and perhaps the entire Earth) end up being swallowed by a black hole created by the new accelerator? Brookhaven, in fact, reported the possibility of *already having* created a momentary black hole recently. Small black holes are not stable and will decay away in microscopic time. Rogue black holes in interstellar space are a complete unknown, since they would not show themselves until close enough to a substantial amount of matter to start giving off radiation. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message
oups.com... Maleki wrote: What a revelation! All ten scenarios mentioned are [sic] bull****. [In reference to an article from the April 14, 2005 Guardian.] Obviously, they are NOT all bull**** since some are things that are completely out of anyone's control which can happen at any time. Let's run down the list. 1: Climate Change Life will adapt ... as it did in the other catastrophic mass extinction events. 2: Telomere erosion Fact. All Mammal species (except one) have all the male reproductive machinery on the Y chromosome which -- notwithstanding its ability to recombine -- is already in the process of losing viability. Some species will adapt as the machinery progressively migrates to other parts of the DNA, as has happened numerous times in the past. In one case, this has already happened (a mouse species). In the rest, the male of the species will simply go extinct and, barring the possibility of the species going all-female (all-female species exist), the species will go extinct. 3: Viral Pandemic 1300 is a case in point. Look at the world population estimates at the US Census Bureau or UN sites; also the graph in the Kapitza paper (Figures 1 and 2) reproduced under http://www.federation.g3z.com/Population/Kapitza.htm Interestingly, recent research has shown that the plague (despite being bacterial) is very close in terms of its effects to AIDS and this is being exploited (for instance) with historical research uncovering what was behind those people who showed immunity to the plague, to try and determine a way to engender immunity to AIDS. 4: Terrorism Danger sco 2 It's a topical issue. 5: Nuclear war Danger sco 8 Actually, under 5. 6: Meteorite impact It could happen anytime, anywhere. 7: Robots taking over Cyborgs. Not robots. It will happen. That's not a prediction. It's a promise. 8: Cosmic ray blast from exploding star Another anytime anywhere. We recently had a major blast so intense that it momentarily lit up the entire night sky. 9: Super-volcanos "Approximately every 50,000 years the Earth experiences a super-volcano. Including one c. 70,000 BC which virtually wiped out the human race. Another: anytime anywhere. 10: Earth swallowed by a black hole Would the Brookhaven labs (and perhaps the entire Earth) end up being swallowed by a black hole created by the new accelerator? Brookhaven, in fact, reported the possibility of *already having* created a momentary black hole recently. Small black holes are not stable and will decay away in microscopic time. Rogue black holes in interstellar space are a complete unknown, since they would not show themselves until close enough to a substantial amount of matter to start giving off radiation. piggybacking; famine, pestilence, war and strife. just like always. -- -- Geo. Michael Henry No! Bad dog! I said sit! anonymous |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jan Panteltje" wrote in message
news:1113603788.f640875a843de4997fae426b1399191e@t eranews... 14) Gentically modified food causes humans to mutate to plants, that then die. Something will go wrong for sure. [hanson] Jan, Jan, don't bother us with your personal fears, as you obviously have mutated into a plant already and die we must all, since uncle Murphy (not uncle Al) is in charge of such matters. Thanks for the laughs ahahaha... ahahahanson |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On a sunny day (Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:08:25 GMT) it happened "hanson"
wrote in . net: "Jan Panteltje" wrote in message news:1113603788.f640875a843de4997fae426b1399191e@ teranews... 14) Gentically modified food causes humans to mutate to plants, that then die. Something will go wrong for sure. [hanson] Jan, Jan, don't bother us with your personal fears, as you obviously have mutated into a plant already and die we must all, since uncle Murphy (not uncle Al) is in charge of such matters. Thanks for the laughs ahahaha... ahahahanson I see you have been at the genetically modified food again! 15) We all get the ahahaha virus. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:22:19 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (15 Apr 2005 11:53:47 -0700) it happened wrote in .com: You mention 10 points. Here are some more; 11) Alien invasion, they desinfect the place before they set up shop here. Can happen anytime. 12) massive suicide attack by all people on all other people. Happens now on small scale, but could spread. 13) Next US weapon test has much more power then expected. Can happen anytime, they were wrong about the last nuke test too. 14) Gentically modified food causes humans to mutate to plants, that then die. Something will go wrong for sure. Hahhahhah That article kept saying "within the next 70 years". I don't know why. This is not the best way of finding out _what_ will kill human race. The journalist who was behind the article was just stupid. Remember that we only need to stop making babies for 50 years or so. That's it. That will wipe us out. I talked about this some years back and conditions under which this scenario can be _forced_ on us. Go dig it. And it doesn't matter when, within 70 years or later. But that's what has the highest probability to eventually do it. -- "dosad gofteh chon nim kerdAr nist bozorgi sarAsar be goftAr nist" - Ferdowsi |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year | habshi | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | July 18th 04 05:18 PM |
| Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year | habshi | Physics - General Discussion | 17 | July 17th 04 09:19 PM |
| Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year | habshi | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | July 17th 04 04:06 AM |
| Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year | habshi | Physics - General Discussion | 19 | July 15th 04 11:50 PM |
| Ten rocket loads could supply all the energy needs of humankind for a year | habshi | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | July 13th 04 03:09 AM |