![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: archibald, blunder, foam, gravity, greatest, john, quantum, wheelers |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gravity totally disappears at the Planck phase transition! All inertia
disappears. We are back to the pre-inflationary unstable chaotic globally flat Minkowski vacuum. All rest masses disappear! That's why quantizing guv is UNRENORMALIZABLE.No gravitons and no quantum gravity foam is to be found. That idea was Wheeler’s greatest blunder. Great men make great mistakes and lesser men waste their careers chasing after them. All attempts to re-quantize emergent ODLRO fields fail, e.g.. quantum gravity is unrenormalizable! "The Question is: What is The Question?" Wheeler Therefore, all attempts at "quantum gravity" must fail! Why? It's the wrong question! |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
From Osher Doctorow
I like "different phase" and "no mass" seems interesting, but are there any "positive" characteristics? Please describe a few. Osher Doctorow |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
"The Question is: What is The Question?" Wheeler [snip] Why? It's the wrong question! I'm confused. Which one is the wrong question? "What is the Question?", or 'Why?" if 'Why", what is the question, and if 'What is the question', then why? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jack Sarfatti" wrote in message m... Gravity totally disappears at the Planck phase transition! All inertia disappears. We are back to the pre-inflationary unstable chaotic globally flat Minkowski vacuum. All rest masses disappear! That's why quantizing guv is UNRENORMALIZABLE.No gravitons and no quantum gravity foam is to be found. That idea was Wheeler’s greatest blunder. Great men make great mistakes and lesser men waste their careers chasing after them. All attempts to re-quantize emergent ODLRO fields fail, e.g.. quantum gravity is unrenormalizable! "The Question is: What is The Question?" Wheeler Therefore, all attempts at "quantum gravity" must fail! Why? It's the wrong question! Well, at least Wheeler liked firecrackers! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Gravity totally disappears at the Planck phase transition! All inertia disappears. We are back to the pre-inflationary unstable chaotic globally flat Minkowski vacuum. All rest masses disappear! That's why quantizing guv is UNRENORMALIZABLE.No gravitons and no quantum gravity foam is to be found. That idea was Wheeler’s greatest blunder. Great men make great mistakes and lesser men waste their careers chasing after them. All attempts to re-quantize emergent ODLRO fields fail, e.g.. quantum gravity is unrenormalizable! "The Question is: What is The Question?" Wheeler Therefore, all attempts at "quantum gravity" must fail! Why? It's the wrong question! Of course it is. You have all the pieces but haven't fitted them together. Think about topology and compactification, and the fact that all energy, regardless of its form, gravitates globally _but not locally_ (at the Planck scale). Now, ask yourself how different point particles can possibly exhibit multiple different force interactions (be sources of multiple different fields); it's obvious to me that the concept of "point" must be re-examined. At our scale, all points are the same size, but at _their_ scale(s), they aren't! Do I have to state explicitly that _which_ compactified fields, associated in _what_ size "points", determine the rest masses of said "points"? Once you've grokked that, it should be obvious how the "pre-inflationary unstable chaotic globally flat Minkowski vacuum" can possibly be locally chaotically unstable, yet globally deterministically flat, and why you should _not_ think of inflation as a one-time event. Hint: in this context, what do "local" and "global" mean in terms of particle interactions, and what determines the distinction? Bottom line, you can't _arbitrarily_ renormalize anything. Don't try to teach Mother Nature to suck eggs; let _her_ show _you_ how it's done. Scuse me, I need another toke. Mark L. Fergerson |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Eugene Wigner's Greatest Blunder? | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | February 7th 05 09:30 PM |
| Comments on Cahill's Quantum Foam Inflow Theory of Gravity | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | December 10th 04 06:03 AM |
| quantum-foam inflow theory of gravity | mountain man | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | November 11th 04 09:52 AM |
| Hal Puthoff's Greatest Blunder on Zero Point Energy | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | September 13th 04 11:11 AM |
| Casimir's Greatest Blunder? | Jack Sarfatti | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 31st 04 11:58 PM |