![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: evolution, help, stellar |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
Aladar wrote: Sorry, typo. t'=t((1-fi)^(-1/3)) this is the correct. But you could check on the slide show at http://stolmarphysics.com No, I can't, since it requires powerpoint, which I don't have. I made a general statement that my correct representation fits better to the observations. You haven't proven your representation fits better since you Haven't Shown The Math. Why do you refuse to supply the math? Again, where is the math showing your equation is a better fit than the GR equation? There. Plus the very Daisy-petal graph of neutron star mass and radius, very much verified by all neutron star observations. The paper you claimed supported your theory was not of neutron star observations. Correct. Thus it can't have the math you claim it has. |
| Ads |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|