A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Can the energy loss of 2 orbiting stars, currently explained by emission of 'gravity waves', be explained by emission of 'dark force'?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 7th 05 posted to sci.physics
Jan Panteltje
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,584
Default Can the energy loss of 2 orbiting stars, currently explained by emission of 'gravity waves', be explained by emission of 'dark force'?

The subject line says it all.
Now that would be cute would it not?
I am probably wrong, but as more and more
the search for those elusive 'gravity waves'
shows no results, time to look for a 'non Jewish'
explanation?

This idea is copyright Jan Panteltje, and any nomination for
the Jan Panteltje price are a given fact.
I propose 'Panteltje force'

hey!
Ads
  #2  
Old March 7th 05 posted to sci.physics
tadchem
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,987
Default Can the energy loss of 2 orbiting stars, currently explained by emission of 'gravity waves', be explained by emission of 'dark force'?


Jan Panteltje wrote:
The subject line says it all.
Now that would be cute would it not?
I am probably wrong, but as more and more
the search for those elusive 'gravity waves'
shows no results,


For a display of current gravity wave records at a station near you:
http://tidesonline.nos.noaa.gov/geographic.html

time to look for a 'non Jewish'
explanation?


The use of the term 'non Jewish' is not only inaccurate an not
humerous, it is gratuitous and makes you appear to be a bigot.

This idea is copyright Jan Panteltje, and any nomination for
the Jan Panteltje price are a given fact.
I propose 'Panteltje force'


Energy is NOT the same thing as force. For a force to transfer energy,
it must be demonstrated to act upon an object through a finite
distance.

If you are seriously going to propose a novel 'force' you had better
describe what attributes of material objects it acts upon to impart a
change in momentum and transfer energy.

Otherwise you have just volunteered to join the ever-growing list of
cranks.

You might want to edit that 'probably' to read 'almost certainly'.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it possible to cause thermionic emission using a magnet? StriatedCentipede Physics - General Discussion 9 February 1st 05 11:12 PM
Question about INDUCED EMISSION Andrej Physics - General Discussion 2 May 12th 04 06:39 PM
Phosphorescent Emission by UV-IR Irradiation John Decker Physics - General Discussion 0 May 9th 04 07:08 AM
photonic emission holog Physics - General Discussion 183 December 25th 03 04:48 AM
photon emission riskbert Physics - General Discussion 12 August 2nd 03 04:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Bucay - Remortgages - Loans - Windows Mobile Themes - Loan