Thu, 17 Feb 2005 01:55:54 -0600 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
in post titled:
Formula for Superconductivity = electronegativities multiplied X T X
R/ d^2; Reconciling Silver to superconductors correcting


Unlike the BCS theory that compartmentalizes every new discovery and
never
connects superconductors to other superconductors not to mention the
intractable
connecting of superconductors to normal conductors. So the BCS theory
is a
disconnect theory. Whereas my theory of Superconductivity as merely
the
maximization of electronegativity-- push and pull of atoms creating a
self
automated current inside the material. The Electronegativity theory
ties and links
normal conductors to superconductivity because there is no strange
quantum
behaviour. All conductivity whether superconduction or normal
conduction is
explained by Maxwell theory of electronegativity.

So I would have to explain why silver is the highest normal conductor.
And I do
that easily and simply by pointing out that the element whose
electronegativity is
in the midpoint-average between cesium and flourine and it happens to
be silver.
And silver is the element of most orderly packing in closed cubic
moreso than
copper or gold. And silver has that lone electron of its outer s
orbital to serve
as the "aspiring self automated current" for which in superconductors
the self
automated current is reached.

So at room temperature, silver is the highest conductor and as we cool
the
temperature we enhance the Electronegativity and we enhance the order
of the atoms
in the compound so cold to reach superconductivity where the current
flows without
resistance.

So the formula for superconductivity applies to normal conductivity
because this
theory does not recognize separate physical phenomenon in conductivity
and that
superconduction is merely a form of normal regular conduction.


There are many cracks in the formulas of Maxwell Equations because they
lack the condition of temperature and we all know that temperature
affects magnetism greatly. So physicists have been dumb and stupid since
the 1860s by ignoring that EM is affected by temperature and so the
Maxwell theory to be a "good theory" must incorporate temperature.

Physicists have by dumb stupid and lazy when it comes to revising
Coulomb's Law which is a part of the Maxwell theory and dumb stupid and
lazy when it comes to revising Newton's 2nd law of motion F = ma.
Why do I say this? Because they lack the fundamental condition or
initial condition of the ambient temperature. Physicists are in a dream
world where they think a good law is one that puts all initial
conditions off to one side and can have the formula describing
everything as idealistic. This is bad science not good science. Good
science, good physics is where the Formula captures the most of the
ambient conditions, captures most of the initial conditions surrounding
any experiment. Pitiful science done by pitiful physicists separates
surrounding conditions and works with some idealistic formula.

Newton's 2nd Law ignores temperature and we all know as good scientists
that temperature has a major role in any physical phenomenon.

Coulomb's Law and the Law of Gravity are forms of F = ma but they are
pitiful formulas not only because they miss the temperature term but
also because both Coulomb's and Gravity miss acceleration as an integral
part of the force law. Look at Coulomb's law and Law of Gravity. They
put charge in the numerator for Coulomb and they put mass in the
numerator for gravity but both go off independently to find an
acceleration-like-term. This is a huge crack in the physics of the
Newton 2nd law and Coulomb law and Gravity law. Not only is there a huge
crack by missing temperature but a crack in that the acceleration term
is begot independently.

In the early years of the 2000 decade I read a science report where a
tiny bit of doping by sandwiching a film of metal increases the Tc of
superconductors. After reading that report I realized that
Superconductivity was not some strange quantum phenomenon but rather
instead was purely Classical Newtonian physics of the Maxwell Equations.
I realized that silver conduction at room temperature had the same
explanation as does mercury at 4 Kelvin and as niobium-tin at 23 Kelvin.
That the BCS theory is all a joke.

So, what is the formula for all of Conduction theory? A formula that
captures not only silver conduction at room temperature and all the so
called normal regular conduction but all the superconductors.

The formula, I believe, is a Coulomb look-alike formula only instead of
charges in the numerator there is Electronegativities where the
electropositive atoms in a unit-cell are added to the electronegative
atoms within that unit cell. And there is a new term in the numerator of
a Temperature term. In the denominator there is the unit-cell distance
squared (which maybe difficult to access if the cell is not cubic in
shape).

Likewise the Law of Gravity needs a temperature term in the numerator.

And Newton's 2nd Law of Motion which defines force as F = ma needs
revision so that it has a temperature term such as F = maT.

All of this is supported by the fact of the Ideal GAs Law formula:
PV =nRT. Notice that this is P= nRT/V which is P = nRT/d^3.

Coulomb's law without temperature is C = qqr/d^2. So that the only
difference in "mathematical form" between pressure in the Ideal Gas Law
and Force in Coulomb Law is that one has a temperature in numerator and
the other has d^2 instead of d^3. So there is only a small difference
between Coulomb law and Ideal Gas Law.

And we can see that Conduction in silver at room temperature or
conduction in mercury at 4 Kelvin involve internal Pressure of moving
electrons from one end to the other end. So we can see that conduction
and superconduction are just Ideal Gas like physical phenomenon.

So with a bit of luck, I should be able to put all conduction theory
under one formula. A formula that is a Coulomb law look-alike except
that it has a new term of Temperature in the numerator. And instead of
charges and a charge constant to deliver a acceleration term in Coulomb
law, for Conduction law I replace charges with Electronegativities and
thus have a different constant term.

With luck, I expect the formula for all Conduction to be somewhat like
this:

Conduction = ( E_p1 + E_n1) x ( E_p2 + E_n2) x..... x T x r
______________________________________
unit cell distance parameter ^2

Mind you the above formula covers all forms of electrical conductivity
whether it be normal conduction or superconduction.

The numerator is composed of electropositive atoms added to
electronegative atoms in a unit cell and multiplied together and a
temperature term and finally a constant term. The denominator is simply
a distance squared begot from the parameters of the unit-cell.

Basically I melded together the Ideal Gas Law with Coulomb's Law for
both are almost identical in mathematical form.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

SCIENCE NEWS of 11May02 of a inverse
proximity effect of lead with silver films. Superconductivity
temperature increased from 1.6 K to that of 1.8 K.

The news of which in year 2002 changed my mind that superconductivity was a
regular conduction phenomenon not a quantum phenomenon and I thence in 2002
dropped my theory of neutrinos as carriers of superconductivity. I thence
believed that Electronegativity and Conduction Band theory were responsible
for superconduction.

However I never elaborated on the internal geometry of normal conduction
such as silver at room temperature and superconduction such as mercury at 4
Kelvin.

Since silver is the highest normal conductor amoung the elements, its
internal geometry must play a major role and that geometry should be
maximized in superconduction. Silver is closed cubic. So if one imagines
vast tubes for the s lone electron of silver to travel.

So this long tube like pattern should be increased in superconduction. And
that is what I suspect the cold temperatures bring about is a perfection of
unencumbering long tubes free of resistance and where the electropositive
push and the electronegative pull create a sort of boost to acceleration of
electrons traveling down these tubes.

Perhaps instead of tubes one can almost envision a "microwire array" inside
superconductors that the coldness brings about and the current zips along
those microwire or tubes.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies