"Bilge" wrote in message
...

Like all crackpots you first reject what is written and then say
you didn't understand it.

[*snip bull*****]


"Where in that equation did (c+v) occur?" --- Poe the blind man.

"Randy Poe" wrote in message
oups.com...

Androcles wrote:

Differentiate this for me, Poe :

½[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/ something_not_there )]
= tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))



Poe responds:
The original equation is this:

(1/2)*[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+x'/(c+v)] =
tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))

Like all crackpots, you first DENY what is written and then claim
to understand it.
Dumbass.

BTW, you ****-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
could it. Hey Androcyst, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high
school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling alley.
- CarbUncle Sch-wart-zit.

Like all crackpots, you first DENY what is written and then claim
to understand it.

****-faced bull****ting baboon.
Androcles.