A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , , , , ,

World full of theories makes an ignima unified field theory



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 13th 05 posted to sci.physics
boblpetersen2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default World full of theories makes an ignima unified field theory

Theory full of theories that makes an ignima. A Unified Field Theory
problem. In looking at the problem of generating a Unified Field
Theory given the multiple appearences of numbers numbers belonging to
different numbering from group theories given different actions
accross different spaces or field and the number of mathematical
systems.

The theory I generated was that you would find most at on palce to be
true as nature is the sum of all.

On of the ones that seemed that it would be a hold out was Fiber
Bundles. But fiber bundles for a home in super conductors. With the
bulk is a system of fibers. The final point being ballastic electrons
in ultra pure copper. I new of low resistance ulta pure copper from
studies on how to protect super conductors from failures. They
surrounded the super conductors with ultra pure copper and at low
temperature it had better thant expected resistance. The next by
there Ideas or Theories would be Quatnum or wave. Size by crystal.
Could say more but this is enough.

http://www.space-where-i-want-to-be....net/index.html

Bob L. Petersen

Stable bundle not lose super conductivity

Name I choose for group and singlet together, World.

Unified Field Theory

super conductors

fiber bundles


Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
Ads
  #2  
Old February 13th 05 posted to sci.physics
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,699
Default World full of theories makes an ignima unified field theory

boblpetersen2 wrote:

Theory full of theories that makes an ignima.


Good start, idiot.

A Unified Field Theory
problem. In looking at the problem of generating a Unified Field
Theory given the multiple appearences of numbers numbers belonging to
different numbering from group theories given different actions
accross different spaces or field and the number of mathematical
systems.

[snip crap]

Uncle Al says, "ACK! THBBFT!"

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
  #3  
Old February 13th 05 posted to sci.physics
boblpetersen2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Near Chaos from the Beast A theory must predict something

Near Chaos from the Beast Simple lacking enough information explain
anything. A theory must prdict something. On could say some part of a
grapefruit occupies evey minute area of space. Too broad but true.

Even the edge of a black hole.

Space is where I want to be. You will be on the ground selling
grapefruit answers.

http://www.space-where-i-want-to-be.120host.net

Bob L. Petersen


Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #4  
Old February 14th 05 posted to sci.physics
boblpetersen2
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to

What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to insight a
riot. My first assumption was that there had to be a mathematical
relation in the strange mesons between the electrons and a proton. I
worked on something that gave a very close approximation. The errors
seem to indicate that there was a finer clock ticking in the back
ground. On mentioning it I was told I was a Boot strapper. A theory
of how too solve the problem lift oneself up by the boot straps.
Assume. Now they have experimentalist.

Accross the the problem one will find parts differenet kinds of
mathematical idea or proven system that do not answer the whole
problem. Is the whole world euclidean or is it part euclidean and
part hyperbolic.

Please, no more grapefruit.

http://www.space-where-i-want-to-be....net/index.html

Bob L. Petersen


Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #5  
Old February 14th 05 posted to sci.physics
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,699
Default What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to

boblpetersen2 wrote:

What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to insight a
riot. My first assumption was that there had to be a mathematical
relation in the strange mesons between the electrons and a proton. I
worked on something that gave a very close approximation.

[snip]

Given any two irrational numbers 'x' and 'y' it is always possible to
find integers j, k, m, n such that |(j)(x^m) - (k)(y^n)| epsilon,
where "epsilon" is arbitrarily small. One should not be impressed by
such a relationship since one could find an arbitrarily large number
of relationships as good or better by picking any other irrational
number, like the Napierian base 'e', Euler's constant gamma, the
Golden Ratio, any irrational square root, etc.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
  #6  
Old February 15th 05 posted to sci.physics
Androcles
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,713
Default What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to


"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
boblpetersen2 wrote:

What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to insight a
riot. My first assumption was that there had to be a mathematical
relation in the strange mesons between the electrons and a proton. I
worked on something that gave a very close approximation.

[snip]

[snip crap]
Spewing psychotic idiot troll.

Androcles.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Lecnach Physics - General Discussion 3 October 24th 04 08:34 PM
Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Gnivrac Physics - General Discussion 4 October 22nd 04 04:31 PM
Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Tahcyq Physics - General Discussion 1 July 16th 04 03:38 PM
Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Colpizeret Physics - General Discussion 2 July 15th 04 04:38 PM
Are Unified Field Theories Justified? Colpizer Physics - General Discussion 2 May 6th 04 07:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Mortgages - Cheap Car Insurance - MPAA - Payday Loan - Urban comes off his bike