![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: field, full, ignima, makes, theories, theory, unified, world |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Theory full of theories that makes an ignima. A Unified Field Theory
problem. In looking at the problem of generating a Unified Field Theory given the multiple appearences of numbers numbers belonging to different numbering from group theories given different actions accross different spaces or field and the number of mathematical systems. The theory I generated was that you would find most at on palce to be true as nature is the sum of all. On of the ones that seemed that it would be a hold out was Fiber Bundles. But fiber bundles for a home in super conductors. With the bulk is a system of fibers. The final point being ballastic electrons in ultra pure copper. I new of low resistance ulta pure copper from studies on how to protect super conductors from failures. They surrounded the super conductors with ultra pure copper and at low temperature it had better thant expected resistance. The next by there Ideas or Theories would be Quatnum or wave. Size by crystal. Could say more but this is enough. http://www.space-where-i-want-to-be....net/index.html Bob L. Petersen Stable bundle not lose super conductivity Name I choose for group and singlet together, World. Unified Field Theory super conductors fiber bundles Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
boblpetersen2 wrote:
Theory full of theories that makes an ignima. Good start, idiot. A Unified Field Theory problem. In looking at the problem of generating a Unified Field Theory given the multiple appearences of numbers numbers belonging to different numbering from group theories given different actions accross different spaces or field and the number of mathematical systems. [snip crap] Uncle Al says, "ACK! THBBFT!" -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Near Chaos from the Beast Simple lacking enough information explain
anything. A theory must prdict something. On could say some part of a grapefruit occupies evey minute area of space. Too broad but true. Even the edge of a black hole. Space is where I want to be. You will be on the ground selling grapefruit answers. http://www.space-where-i-want-to-be.120host.net Bob L. Petersen Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to insight a
riot. My first assumption was that there had to be a mathematical relation in the strange mesons between the electrons and a proton. I worked on something that gave a very close approximation. The errors seem to indicate that there was a finer clock ticking in the back ground. On mentioning it I was told I was a Boot strapper. A theory of how too solve the problem lift oneself up by the boot straps. Assume. Now they have experimentalist. Accross the the problem one will find parts differenet kinds of mathematical idea or proven system that do not answer the whole problem. Is the whole world euclidean or is it part euclidean and part hyperbolic. Please, no more grapefruit. http://www.space-where-i-want-to-be....net/index.html Bob L. Petersen Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
boblpetersen2 wrote:
What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to insight a riot. My first assumption was that there had to be a mathematical relation in the strange mesons between the electrons and a proton. I worked on something that gave a very close approximation. [snip] Given any two irrational numbers 'x' and 'y' it is always possible to find integers j, k, m, n such that |(j)(x^m) - (k)(y^n)| epsilon, where "epsilon" is arbitrarily small. One should not be impressed by such a relationship since one could find an arbitrarily large number of relationships as good or better by picking any other irrational number, like the Napierian base 'e', Euler's constant gamma, the Golden Ratio, any irrational square root, etc. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Uncle Al" wrote in message ... boblpetersen2 wrote: What I said was not a theory it was an insight not meant to insight a riot. My first assumption was that there had to be a mathematical relation in the strange mesons between the electrons and a proton. I worked on something that gave a very close approximation. [snip] [snip crap] Spewing psychotic idiot troll. Androcles. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are Unified Field Theories Justified? | Lecnach | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | October 24th 04 08:34 PM |
| Are Unified Field Theories Justified? | Gnivrac | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | October 22nd 04 04:31 PM |
| Are Unified Field Theories Justified? | Tahcyq | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | July 16th 04 03:38 PM |
| Are Unified Field Theories Justified? | Colpizeret | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | July 15th 04 04:38 PM |
| Are Unified Field Theories Justified? | Colpizer | Physics - General Discussion | 2 | May 6th 04 07:04 PM |