A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , , ,

What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 12th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
...
What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

http://www.physics.uc.edu/~kayk/cpviol/CP.html


(According to the Smart Model....)
So what, a K meson will not decay the same way all the time. This just

means
that the internal sub-structure varies for each K meson, which will produce
different decay modes.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


You are increadibly stupid.

(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)



The Standard Model doesn't use an internal sub-structure to it's analysis at
the sub-atomic level. The Smart Model does. An analogy of the Standard Model CP
violations is like saying a grain of salt is the smallest particle you can
have, with no internal molecular structure, and when you break it up you always
get a different number of smaller pieces, so there is a parity violation.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


Ads
  #2  
Old August 12th 03 posted to sci.physics
Starblade Darksquall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 943
Default What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message ...
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
...
What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

http://www.physics.uc.edu/~kayk/cpviol/CP.html


(According to the Smart Model....)
So what, a K meson will not decay the same way all the time. This just

means
that the internal sub-structure varies for each K meson, which will produce
different decay modes.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


You are increadibly stupid.

(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)



The Standard Model doesn't use an internal sub-structure to it's analysis at
the sub-atomic level. The Smart Model does. An analogy of the Standard Model CP
violations is like saying a grain of salt is the smallest particle you can
have, with no internal molecular structure, and when you break it up you always
get a different number of smaller pieces, so there is a parity violation.


No, you dumb****. There's a CP violation because if you change
something's charge and its parity, you do NOT get the same results as
you do before. It has nothing to do with 'breaking something up into
smaller pieces', as you seem to think. It has to do with things which
are normally invariant and symmetric under all other laws of physics
but which in some unique circumstances seem to be capable of being
violated.

When a neutrino is left handed and the antineutrino is right handed...
do I have this the right way or did I reverse it? Anyways, that's a C
violation and a P violation, but putting the two together gives you CP
symmetry. Now take neutral Kaons. The one that spews out matter has a
longer mean lifespan than the other, but the same total lifespan. At
least, if not, it's the other way around. Anyways, they are antimatter
partners of eachother. It violates CP. However, it also violates T.
However, putting the two together gives you CPT invariance. The
universe does not violate CPT.

Now are you getting it?

BTW, just in case you didn't know, C is charge conjugation, P is
parity, and T is time reversal. Normally physics is symmetric to all
of them, but it may have asymmetries to one or to two of these, but
not all three combined.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)
  #3  
Old August 12th 03 posted to sci.physics
S. Enterprize Company
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,285
Default What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
...
(S. Enterprize Company) wrote in message
...
What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model.

http://www.physics.uc.edu/~kayk/cpviol/CP.html


(According to the Smart Model....)
So what, a K meson will not decay the same way all the time. This just

means
that the internal sub-structure varies for each K meson, which will

produce
different decay modes.


Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/

You are increadibly stupid.

(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)



The Standard Model doesn't use an internal sub-structure to it's

analysis at
the sub-atomic level. The Smart Model does. An analogy of the Standard

Model CP
violations is like saying a grain of salt is the smallest particle you can
have, with no internal molecular structure, and when you break it up you

always
get a different number of smaller pieces, so there is a parity violation.


No, you dumb****. There's a CP violation because if you change
something's charge and its parity, you do NOT get the same results as
you do before. It has nothing to do with 'breaking something up into
smaller pieces', as you seem to think. It has to do with things which
are normally invariant and symmetric under all other laws of physics
but which in some unique circumstances seem to be capable of being
violated.

When a neutrino is left handed and the antineutrino is right handed...
do I have this the right way or did I reverse it? Anyways, that's a C
violation and a P violation, but putting the two together gives you CP
symmetry. Now take neutral Kaons. The one that spews out matter has a
longer mean lifespan than the other, but the same total lifespan. At
least, if not, it's the other way around. Anyways, they are antimatter
partners of eachother. It violates CP. However, it also violates T.
However, putting the two together gives you CPT invariance. The
universe does not violate CPT.

Now are you getting it?



Yes.

Here is grain of salt.

.---

Now watch it decay

.. -- one mode
... two mode

Violations found. Two can't be three.






BTW, just in case you didn't know, C is charge conjugation, P is
parity, and T is time reversal. Normally physics is symmetric to all
of them, but it may have asymmetries to one or to two of these, but
not all three combined.



Smart's Alt. Physics News Group
http://pub39.bravenet.com/forum/show...20272813&cpv=1
S. Enterprize (Science Journal)
http://smart1234.s-enterprize.com/


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What CP violation? There's no violation according to The Smart Model. S. Enterprize Company Physics - General Discussion 0 August 11th 03 08:29 AM
Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter Y.Porat Physics - General Discussion 4 July 20th 03 08:48 PM
Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter Starblade Darksquall Physics - General Discussion 1 July 20th 03 05:57 AM
Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law Of Conservation Of Matter Pyriform Physics - General Discussion 2 July 18th 03 06:25 AM
Einstein's Relativistic Mass is in violation of The Law OfCons... tj Frazir Physics - General Discussion 1 July 18th 03 06:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Loans - Remortgages - Money - Fast Loans - Adverse Credit Remortgage