![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: ethics |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
There is a certain kind of research that goes on in brain functioning,
by finding people who have had brain damage in certain regions and asessing the overall effects and impacts this has had. In fact, researches have salivated and hunted down cases to probe this phenonmenon. Why is science in this "straight jacket"? Wouldn't it be so much more productive to do this research ourselves, by getting subjects and purposefully destroying parts of their brains (by surgey, cutting vessels and arteries, applying toxins, etc. to selective parts) and documenting directly what was done and what happened? We could do this on babies as well as grown ups of all ages. Why not do this? What would be wrong with forcing these experiments on people? We could use death row inmates, get some use out of them before they die (for example, they're going to die anyway. Let's get some use out of it, what a waste.). Or we could make it volunteer. We could give death row inmates a sign up for the option of undergoing important experiments instead of or in addition to dying, noble that will increase human's understanding of brain functioning. Perhaps letting them one last attempt at redemption before ending their miserable lives. We could make the volunteer program open for all people, not just death row inmates. (For example, I would volunteer, if I knew that the research was being conducted in good hands, by competent people who are good at this research, and would take good data that might but not neccesarily lead to important new discoveries of brain function.) In some parts of the world, people blow themsels up for a cause. What nobler cause then the furtherment of science for the rest of humanity! Perhaps, if the number of subjects was a trickle, we could offer financial incentives, to the family who gives up a baby for exciting experimental research, or for the surviving family members. (Giving a person the option of not just furthering humanity's development at their sacrifice, but also immediate betterment of their loved ones.) We could go to other parts of the world, not just the United States, in fact, the market would probably be cheaper. There is not just the noble aspects of these experiments, like potential new understanding for stroke victims, etc. but also the excitement that can be shared by all participants, including the experimenter and the experimentee. What will happen when we do this, or do that? What surprises lurk behind the horizons of this new enterprise? What an exciting adventure! Let's do it!! |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Joe wrote:
There is a certain kind of research that goes on in brain functioning, by finding people who have had brain damage in certain regions and asessing the overall effects and impacts this has had. In fact, researches have salivated and hunted down cases to probe this phenonmenon. [snip crap] http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
There are some other experiments that I have been thinking about.
What would be wrong with investigating the structural failure of a baby's skull? We could place a baby's head in a vice, and slowly compress it, taking carful data of the pressure and record when there is a sudden drop in resistance to that pressure and the skull cracks. How does this yield strength change with age? We could perform the experiment on adults and people of all ages to get a good spectrum. We could also analyze the electrical conductivity of the human body, at different voltages. Starting from small voltages, to very strong (arbitrarily high) voltages. How does the electrical resistance change? What about ccross different parts of the body? We could put one electrode on one hand, and another on the other, and start measuring. Or we could put one up the anus, and another as skull cap, and repeat the same measurement. How dos temperature effect resistance? We could go to very low temperatures, and then to very high. What about the yield strength of different parts of the body? We could apply a torque and twist the head, at what point does the neck snap? Again for different ages. What about bending torques on arms, legs, back, etc. When does hooke's law fail for stretching of the human body? We could chain the legs and and hands, and stretch. When does the body yield? What about the compressibility of the human body? How does arbitrarily large pressure effect the compressiblity? Again we could do this for different body parts. When does stretching out a human penus go plastic? (In other words, not return to the same shape as before.) When does it get "ripped off" to use less scientific terminology. What about the compressibility of the human testicle? At different, arbitrarily large, pressures? If this is tough to do just detach it from the rest of the body. What about putting a clamp inside a woman's vagina, and applying pressure to "open it". At what point does terring begin? In babies versus adults. What about using calipers to measure the diameter of a woman's nipple? What about thermal conductivity? At different temperatures, how does the body conduct heat? Even at drastic temperature gradients. What is the freezing point of the human body? What about the melting point? What about scattering of high energy particles in the body? Like gamma rays and others. There are other things too, like reaction time with different chemicals and how long it takes to "disolve" a human body in different acids. How the body combusts, etc. There are others too, like effects of malnutritution, water depravation, and also changing the ambient atmospheric pressure to very low, to very high, and seeing the effects on babies and adults alike. What will happen then? As an aside, why wait until the patient is dead before beginning these experiments? You can be waiting around a long time before you get to begin your experiments. Someone also might object "but what use are some of these?" What "use" is there in performing them on crystals, metals, plastics, semi-conductors, etc. It is purely for the joy of science, to discover the "what will happen", a journey in the unknown. To come up with theory to describe the results. We do this all the time with wires and other materials, what's wrong with doing it on the human body? Someone should write a book: "The Joy of Science: Experiments that you can do with the Human Body" Everything becomes clear when you recognize that fundamtentally, it's the exact same stuff in a human body and concrete, metal wire, plastic, etc. What do you think? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Joe wrote: body? Someone should write a book: "The Joy of Science: Experiments that you can do with the Human Body" Everything becomes clear when you recognize that fundamtentally, it's the exact same stuff in a human body and concrete, metal wire, plastic, etc. What do you think? Have you read -A Modest Proposal- by Jonathan Swift? Bob Kolker |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Joe wrote:
There are some other experiments that I have been thinking about. What would be wrong with investigating the structural failure of a baby's skull? [snip} African or European baby's skull? -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Joe wrote:
There are some other experiments that I have been thinking about. run on sentences... bad.. break up your posts with occasional carriage returns and you might get more answers. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Have you read -A Modest Proposal- by Jonathan Swift?
Thanks, I just read it at : http://art-bin.com/art/omodest.html#hit There's nothing new under the sun ![]() |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
African or European baby's skull?
Well, it would be interesting to see if there was any differences in fatigue strength between the two. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Joe wrote:
African or European baby's skull? Well, it would be interesting to see if there was any differences in fatigue strength between the two. Go rent "Monty Python and the Holy Grail". Slap forehead. Mark L. Fergerson |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
When I was young, a friend of mine and I used to like making comedy in
class during school, and we sometimes failed to have reasonable limits. Once, while we were having fun catching lizards in the desert, we dissected one alive with cactus needles. I always wondered if my friend later became some sort of warped, Mormon, serial killer. I myself spent about 18 years of my life incarcerated, and I have five adult felony convictions. I became a Christian and have avoided crime for kicks ever since, but the sad thing about your desired experiments is that's just about the way things are. The difference between a murderous terrorist and a Republican ideologue regarding a prisoner's right to medical care is the means of execution. Each one is self-righteous. Maybe you can get a good job in Iraq? Very Respectfully, Ray Donald Pratt |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Invitation to have your name listed in support of well motivated ethics and ideals in science | David Norman | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | November 26th 03 11:22 AM |