![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: against, case, genius |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
P(n[IQ] q) = k for all C(g1,g2) where k - 0 when q - max(IQ
t=infinite) The probability of there being more than one great intelligence (genius) during a generation is near zero, and of course the probability that two ro more intelligences coincide in time and place out of an university is near impossibility. All instances of multi genius generation can be explained sociologically by envy. For instance, Voltaire writing the Encyclopedia, Bacon writing Shakespeare, Mendelssohn giving away compositions/themes to his friends, Hegel (Kant? Fichte?) giving away ideas to other philosophers, Heisenberg (Bohr?) in the quantum mechanics generation, etc. We can envision each generation as a hyperplane in the space of human possibility where there is (at some moments in time, with certain frequency) a high peak, global macimum, followed by other minor peaks and a continuum varying about an average, (for the intelligence measure, whatever it is taken). That the works of genius get distributed, voluntarily or forcefully, would be an expression of th euniversal motive of envy... (The equation is just to impress! Easy way to take notes, though I guess it can be expressed more formally in a model of gene trait distribution along whole populations). |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Fabrizio J. Bonsignore" wrote:
P(n[IQ] q) = k for all C(g1,g2) where k - 0 when q - max(IQ t=infinite) The probability of there being more than one great intelligence (genius) during a generation is near zero, and of course the probability that two ro more intelligences coincide in time and place out of an university is near impossibility. [snip] 1900-1930, Relativity plus quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman at Cornell or Caltech. Caltech, MIT today; Edward Witten, Frank Wilczek, Alain Connes in the same room. Stooopid. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fabrizio J. Bonsignore wrote:
lots and lots of stuff snipped.. in fact quite a bit more stuff for someone in your dire straights to have time to post... |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Uncle Al You are very modest(small ego) you surely could sit in the
same room with Witten,wilczek,Connes,and let me add Brian Greene. For myself I would like to be a fly on the wall,and listen to you all. Bert |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Fabrizio J. Bonsignore wrote: We can envision each generation as a hyperplane in the space of human possibility where there is (at some moments in time, with certain frequency) a high peak, global macimum, followed by other minor peaks and a continuum varying about an average, (for the intelligence measure, whatever it is taken). Hyperplanes in affine space are flat. Bob Kolker |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Uncle Al wrote in message ...
"Fabrizio J. Bonsignore" wrote: P(n[IQ] q) = k for all C(g1,g2) where k - 0 when q - max(IQ t=infinite) The probability of there being more than one great intelligence (genius) during a generation is near zero, and of course the probability that two ro more intelligences coincide in time and place out of an university is near impossibility. [snip] 1900-1930, Relativity plus quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman at Cornell or Caltech. Caltech, MIT today; Edward Witten, Frank Wilczek, Alain Connes in the same room. Stooopid. Sorry, don`t know them save Feynman. How many scientific or technological revolutions are they starting? (not personal, for the sake of argumentation 8) And if you read in lines (not inbetween the lines), the argument says `out of an university`. We have to take into account the increasing size of wrold population... Stupid is writeen with u. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Morituri-Max" wrote in message ...
Fabrizio J. Bonsignore wrote: lots and lots of stuff snipped.. in fact quite a bit more stuff for someone in your dire straights to have time to post... Who does not speaketh is not heard... my dire straits are precisely to have time to post, instead of writing formally in a comfortable home. And my time I am being told is running out, at which point I start going hysteric... |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Fabrizio J. Bonsignore" wrote:
Uncle Al wrote in message ... "Fabrizio J. Bonsignore" wrote: P(n[IQ] q) = k for all C(g1,g2) where k - 0 when q - max(IQ t=infinite) The probability of there being more than one great intelligence (genius) during a generation is near zero, and of course the probability that two ro more intelligences coincide in time and place out of an university is near impossibility. [snip] 1900-1930, Relativity plus quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman at Cornell or Caltech. Caltech, MIT today; Edward Witten, Frank Wilczek, Alain Connes in the same room. Stooopid. Sorry, don`t know them save Feynman. How many scientific or technological revolutions are they starting? (not personal, for the sake of argumentation 8) [sbip] Hopeless ignorant idiot. You are empirically disproven. Have the good taste to shut up. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
And this kind of little traps I have been experiencing the whole
year... But it was not an insult, it was a statement of fact... Uncle Al wrote in message ... "Fabrizio J. Bonsignore" wrote: P(n[IQ] q) = k for all C(g1,g2) where k - 0 when q - max(IQ t=infinite) The probability of there being more than one great intelligence (genius) during a generation is near zero, and of course the probability that two ro more intelligences coincide in time and place out of an university is near impossibility. [snip] 1900-1930, Relativity plus quantum mechanics. Richard Feynman at Cornell or Caltech. Caltech, MIT today; Edward Witten, Frank Wilczek, Alain Connes in the same room. Stooopid. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Morituri-Max" wrote in message ...
Fabrizio J. Bonsignore wrote: lots and lots of stuff snipped.. in fact quite a bit more stuff for someone in your dire straights to have time to post... And the fact is that if I don`t post, then who would care if I am in dire straits? Search `Fabrizio J Bonsignore` in google groups, sort by date visit ghamac.org GHAMAC Home: Art, Music And Computers Danilo J Bonsignore (Danielo, Daniello, this is for search engines...) (8(={\ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| In case of WWIII | Uncle Al | Physics - General Discussion | 7 | September 25th 04 03:36 AM |
| A gEniUs Society !!! YOU ??? - (-)"(-)- HO !!! | Kirk Gregory Czuhai | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | June 22nd 04 01:17 AM |
| Glimpses of Genius | Sam Wormley | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | May 15th 04 03:12 PM |
| Just in case I'm wrong, which I probably am not. | Starblade Darksquall | Physics - General Discussion | 1 | February 20th 04 05:39 PM |
| Repulsive Astronomy: Strengthening the case for dark energy | Mitchell | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | August 5th 03 11:00 PM |