Thu, 02 Sep 2004 02:17:19 -0500 Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(much snipped)


But would I be so lucky also as to derive the Pauli Exclusion Principle
and the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics from this math theorem applied to the
Maxwell Equations? At first thought I would say definitely not. But on
second thoughts perhaps it is do-able. If we consider the Pauli
Exclusion principle as some form of trying to squeeze a cylinder that is
bigger than a sphere inside the sphere. Or in the case of the 2nd Law
that heat flowing from a cold body to a hot body is like squeezing a
large sphere inside of a small cylinder. And what Maxwell Equations do
we use to derive Pauli Exclusion and 2nd Law of Thermodynamics?

One picture of this would be the simultaneous enclosement of say Faraday's
Law with Ampere-Maxwell Law where both would be considered cylinders
geometrically and that the squeezing of Faraday's Law inside of Ampere's
Law is the essence of the Pauli Exclusion Principle.

However, in the ability to see the 4 Maxwell Equations as spheres or
cylinders and coupling the mathematical theorem of 2/3 upper limit of
surface-area or volume in enclosement, I seem to run into trouble with the
Maxwell law of monopoles in that I seem to never be able to use it or need
to use it. And that is mildly unsettling to me for science has to use
everything. But I seem to easily use Coulomb law as sphere and Faraday and
Ampere laws as cylinders but it troubles me that monopole law seems
unuseable.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.archimedesplutonium.com
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots
of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies