A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , ,

Why do earth not Fall on Sun?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity
Warhol
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 51
Default What Really matters ?

On May 3, 6:03 am, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
Why would anyone want to imagine the earth turning into
it's own solar system ( assuming it were possible ) ?

Ask yourself this: $B!H(B What Really matters ? $B!I(B.
The only lord that matters in the landlord ( e.g. the government );
and, at some level, every landlord is also a tenant.



because its the truth... Worlds become Suns... so is made our Galaxy.
Ads
  #102  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,079
Default I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase.

Jeff?Relf wrote:
[snip crap]

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
  #103  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 977
Default I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase.

Jeff?Relf wrote:

By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
ł =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: ˛.

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with ł ˛ quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.


No one cares, JeffglyphRelf. As long as you continue to flaunt
usenet conventions, you will continue to be laughed at and scorned.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
  #104  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.usenet.kooks
Michael Moroney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,146
Default I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase.

Art Deco writes:

Jeff?Relf wrote:


By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
' =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: '.

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with ' ' quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.


This is Usenet convention for decades now. It is useful (no matter what
the newsreader is) because the point being replied to is right there,
amd you don't have to chase the References: thread. Also if you're
replying to one or two points from a 200 line post, you don't have to
(re)read the 200 line post and try to figure out which point is being
commented on.

If you don't like it, feel free to go away, as Usenet isn't for you.

No one cares, JeffglyphRelf. As long as you continue to flaunt
usenet conventions, you will continue to be laughed at and scorned.


ITYM 'flout' usenet conventions.
  #105  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.usenet.kooks
A [Temporary] Dog
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 28
Default I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase.

On Sat, 03 May 2008 09:34:24 -0600, Art Deco
painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
and shouted:

Jeff?Relf wrote:

By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
ł =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: ˛.

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with ł ˛ quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.


No one cares, JeffglyphRelf. As long as you continue to flaunt
usenet conventions, you will continue to be laughed at and scorned.


I'm pretty sure he'd find annother way to be laughed at and scorned
even if he started following USEnet conventions on quoting.
--
-A (Temporary) Dog, Prophet of the Copybook Headings
use the domain that is erols with tempdog as a name for email
"AUK is no more sinister than its detractors allow it to be." - Jade
  #106  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 977
Default I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase.

Michael Moroney wrote:

Art Deco writes:

Jeff?Relf wrote:


By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
' =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: '.

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with ' ' quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.


This is Usenet convention for decades now. It is useful (no matter what
the newsreader is) because the point being replied to is right there,
amd you don't have to chase the References: thread. Also if you're
replying to one or two points from a 200 line post, you don't have to
(re)read the 200 line post and try to figure out which point is being
commented on.

If you don't like it, feel free to go away, as Usenet isn't for you.

No one cares, JeffglyphRelf. As long as you continue to flaunt
usenet conventions, you will continue to be laughed at and scorned.


ITYM 'flout' usenet conventions.


You are correct, sir. My bad.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
  #107  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 977
Default I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase.

A [Temporary] Dog wrote:

On Sat, 03 May 2008 09:34:24 -0600, Art Deco
painted a red bull's eye on his forehead, ascended the altar of Fluffy
and shouted:

Jeff?Relf wrote:

By the way, I ( for one ) am very put-off with people ( like you )
who begin their posts with crap like:
ł =?UTF-8?Q?Jeff=E2=96=B2Relf?= writes: ˛.

I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase
( or quote with ł ˛ quote marks, as books do ).
For any half-competent Usenetter, the thread is still there.


No one cares, JeffglyphRelf. As long as you continue to flaunt
usenet conventions, you will continue to be laughed at and scorned.


I'm pretty sure he'd find annother way to be laughed at and scorned
even if he started following USEnet conventions on quoting.


He always has posting his unreadable C code as a fall-back position.

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
  #108  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.usenet.kooks
Jeff▲Relf[_30_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 126
Default I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase.

You bitched and moaned about the style of my carefully-constructed post,
so I used the opportunity ( as I often do ) to explain my preferences.
I'll always prefer those who concisely paraphrase, with “ ” quotes.

You prefer Mr. Art Deco, it seems,
a man who's forever chevron quoting hundreds of lines
( a.k.a. cascading ) adding a word or two on the end.

Mr. Art Deco couldn't write a paragraph if his life depended on it.
Your choice is your choice, I don't give a ****,
I've got other fish to fry.

  #109  
Old May 3rd 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.usenet.kooks
Art Deco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 977
Default I much prefer those who concisely paraphrase.

Jeff?Relf wrote:

You bitched and moaned about the style of my carefully-constructed post,
so I used the opportunity ( as I often do ) to explain my preferences.
I'll always prefer those who concisely paraphrase, with ł ˛ quotes.

You prefer Mr. Art Deco, it seems,
a man who's forever chevron quoting hundreds of lines
( a.k.a. cascading ) adding a word or two on the end.

Mr. Art Deco couldn't write a paragraph if his life depended on it.
Your choice is your choice, I don't give a ****,
I've got other fish to fry.


Yet here you are, JeffglyphRelf. BTW, the votes are running quite
strongly in your favor for the Office of Illucidus Maximus,
JeffglyphRelf. Good show!

--
"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen
  #110  
Old May 4th 08 posted to sci.physics,alt.philosophy,alt.astronomy,sci.physics.relativity,alt.usenet.kooks
Jeff▲Relf[_30_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 126
Default Why hasn't Bert ( a.k.a. Treb ) won any awards ?

What do you mean by: “ Yet here you are, JeffglyphRelf. ” ?
I said I prefer those who concisely paraphrase and use “ ” quotes;
I didn't say I was leaving UseNet.

If I won “ The Office of Illucidus Maximus ”,
that'd be the fourth award I've won this year, one per month,
since Bert ( not you ) drew me into Alt.Astronomy.

Hopefully, after I've exhausted all of your catagories,
you'll create some new ones for me.
What about Bert ( a.k.a. Treb ) ? why hasn't he won any awards ?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
#71 Earth would look like a Pulsar far out in space due tomagnetosphere (acts as a crystal) influence on Earth Radio Emissions ; plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Physics - General Discussion 0 April 23rd 08 07:27 PM
#71 Earth would look like a Pulsar far out in space due tomagnetosphere (acts as a crystal) influence on Earth Radio Emissions ; plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 0 April 23rd 08 07:27 PM
Rate of free fall vs Acceleration of free fall Donald G. Shead Physics - General Discussion 34 September 21st 03 05:01 AM
Rate of free fall vs Acceleration of free fall Donald G. Shead Physics - General (alternative forum) 31 September 21st 03 05:01 AM
Force Required to cause Earth to fall to Sun in 50 years? Grok Physics - General Discussion 66 September 16th 03 05:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright Š2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Meeting Rooms - atDIR Directory - ؾوع سكس - Modded Xbox - Remortgages