Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the
universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."

Pentcho Valev

On Apr 25, 7:41*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo *asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the
universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538
Paul Davies, 2003: "The "c" here stands for the speed of light. It is
one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is
it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the
speed of light might not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this
mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?"

Einstein zombie world, 2003-2008, while the next Great Revolution in
Science is still around the corner:
:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ

http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/E.../Einsteine.jpg

http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/divine.htm

http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/i...e_einstein.mp3

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=rHDjSD...eature=related

Pentcho Valev

On Apr 25, 7:41 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the

I dont understand 3×106 meters/second

It must be 3*10^8 m/s


universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."

Pentcho Valev

On May 3, 5:07 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On Apr 25, 7:41 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:



Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the
universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538
Paul Davies, 2003: "The "c" here stands for the speed of light. It is
one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is
it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the
speed of light might not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this
mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?"

Einstein zombie world, 2003-2008, while the next Great Revolution in
Science is still around the corner:
:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ

http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/E.../Einsteine.jpg

http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/divine.htm

http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/i...e_einstein.mp3

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=rHDjSD...eature=related

Pentcho Valev


I always wondered how it would be like if c were still
constant but only 10 km/h

On May 3, 6:42 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
Smooth John wrote:
On Apr 25, 7:41 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the

I dont understand 3×106 meters/second

It must be 3*10^8 m/s

universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."

Pentcho Valev


+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
| DO NOT | | LIKE Pentcho Valev -- THEY DRY |
| FEED | | UP AND BLOW AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
| DA | | |
| TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
`\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /

You?

On May 3, 8:28 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
Smooth John wrote:
On May 3, 6:42 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
Smooth John wrote:
On Apr 25, 7:41 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the
I dont understand 3×106 meters/second
It must be 3*10^8 m/s
universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."
Pentcho Valev

+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| PLEASE | | BEST TO IGNORE ATTENTION SEEKING TROLLS |
| DO NOT | | LIKE Pentcho Valev -- THEY DRY |
| FEED | | UP AND BLOW AWAY WITHOUT FEEDBACK |
| DA | | |
| TROLLS | | http://www.angelfire.com/space/usenet/ |
+------------+ +---------------------------------------------+
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
`\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' / `\ '/ / ' /

You?

I'm just the gardener... putting up and taking down the signs...

However, I have it on good authority that there has never been
an observation that contradicted a prediction of special or
general relativity.

Most of the trolls know enough about relativity to know what it
predicts... enough to "claim" otherwise to try to get a reaction
out of the more educated folks.

What about the references he gives. They are doctors in physics.
Is that still uneducated to you?

"Smooth John" wrote in message
...
On May 3, 5:07 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On Apr 25, 7:41 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:



Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the
universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538
Paul Davies, 2003: "The "c" here stands for the speed of light. It is
one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is
it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the
speed of light might not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this
mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?"

Einstein zombie world, 2003-2008, while the next Great Revolution in
Science is still around the corner:
:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ

http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/E.../Einsteine.jpg

http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/divine.htm

http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/i...e_einstein.mp3

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=rHDjSD...eature=related

Pentcho Valev


I always wondered how it would be like if c were still
constant but only 10 km/h
(End)

--------------------------------

So damn fast yet so damn slow! The mass of Earth's Moon is about 1.3
seconds out front in space and time of the Moon observed to be 1.3 light
seconds from Earth here and now. The reality of some supposed distant
galaxy, if it still exists is about 11 billion years out front in space and
time of the galaxy observed to be aproximately 11 billion light years from
Earth here and now.

A traveler whose mass and reality is thousands of seconds out front in
space and time of the observed traveler at thousands of light seconds from
Earth is [seen] from Earth to be past orientated (slowed or slowing down in
time) and is [perceived] to be future orientated (speeded up or speeding up
in time over that first -- observed -- orientation), all relatively speaking
that is. 'c' is a peculiar animal, reckoned so damn fast, and it is that
fast, yet is never as fast as reality on the spot. 'c' as a communicator
always being so damn slow and, given time, always falling further and
further behind in time to the "as is universe." That's the problem with this
universal constant, it's so damn slow.

So, as a communicator, it does appear to get slower and ever slower, the
communication falling farther and ever farther behind the times. It's a good
thing then that the universe is always more up-to-date, and always giving
out more light, all along the line from the most distant non-local frame
(the Planck stage of the Universe) to the most local-relative frame. The
communication is absorbed and relayed in a constantly growing accumulation
of communications. The very last, very nearest and latest, communication is
always doing 'c' (=300,000 kps) (=1) (=infinity), and it is the one
containing every prior communication ("every prior communication" --
assembled! -- else there will be no communication at all).

GLB

On May 3, 5:07*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On Apr 25, 7:41*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo *asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) -is known as the
universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo -who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London- says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538
Paul Davies, 2003: "The "c" here stands for the speed of light. It is
one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is
it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the
speed of light might not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this
mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?"

Einstein zombie world, 2003-2008, while the next Great Revolution in
Science is still around the corner:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ

http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/E.../Einsteine.jpg

http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/divine.htm

http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/i...e_einstein.mp3

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=rHDjSD...eature=related

The idiotic atmosphere in Einstein zombie world allows Einsteinians
not only to safely leave the sinking ship but also to make career and
even fight against one another by refuting Einstein's 1905 false light
postulate:

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/smol...n03_print.html
Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the
effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of
the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory
that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the
same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the
sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself
based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy
of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized
Einstein's general theory of relativity.....But there is another
possibility. This is that the principle of relativity is preserved,
but Einstein's special theory of relativity requires modification so
as to allow photons to have a speed that depends on energy. The most
shocking thing I have learned in the last year is that this is a real
possibility. A photon can have an energy-dependent speed without
violating the principle of relativity!"

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1...ingtheory.html
Lee Smolin: "So I've said, look, if the speed of light isn't
universal, that disconfirms string theory. But the string theorists
say they could probably invent versions of the theory that work either
way. We'd have to change our notion of what science is to accommodate
this proposition. You just can't do science on that basis."

Pentcho Valev

On May 8, 7:30*am, Pentcho Valev wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
On May 3, 5:07*pm,PentchoValev wrote:

On Apr 25, 7:41*pm,PentchoValev wrote:

Einstein's 1905 false light postulate fiercely attacked in Einstein
criminal cult:

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog...-than-the.html
"A brilliant young physicist João Magueijo *asks the heretical
question: What if the speed of light—now accepted as one of the
unchanging foundations of modern physics—were not
constant?....Magueijo is trying to pick apart one of Einstein’s most
impenetrable tenets, the constancy of the speed of light. This idea of
a constant speed (about 3×106 meters/second) - is known as the
universal speed limit. Nothing can, has, or ever will travel faster
than light. Magueijo - who received his doctorate from Cambridge, has
been a faculty member at Princeton and Cambridge, and is currently a
professor at Imperial College, London - says: not so. His VSL theory
presupposes a speed of light that can be energy or time-space
dependent."

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538
Paul Davies, 2003: "The "c" here stands for the speed of light. It is
one of the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is
it? In recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the
speed of light might not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this
mean the next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?"

Einstein zombie world, 2003-2008, while the next Great Revolution in
Science is still around the corner:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ

http://www.bnl.gov/community/Tours/E.../Einsteine.jpg

http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/divine.htm

http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/i...e_einstein.mp3

http://fr.youtube.com/watch?v=rHDjSD...eature=related

The idiotic atmosphere in Einstein zombie world allows Einsteinians
not only to safely leave the sinking ship but also to make career and
even fight against one another by refuting Einstein's 1905 falselight
postulate:

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/smol...n03_print.html
Lee Smolin: "Now, here is the really interesting part: Some of the
effects predicted by the theory appear to be in conflict with one of
the principles of Einstein's special theory of relativity, the theory
that says that the speed of light is a universal constant. It's the
same for all photons, and it is independent of the motion of the
sender or observer. How is this possible, if that theory is itself
based on the principles of relativity? The principle of the constancy
of the speed of light is part of special relativity, but we quantized
Einstein's general theory of relativity.....But there is another
possibility. This is that the principle of relativity is preserved,
but Einstein's special theory of relativity requires modification so
as to allow photons to have a speed that depends on energy. The most
shocking thing I have learned in the last year is that this is a real
possibility. A photon can have an energy-dependent speed without
violating the principle of relativity!"

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1...ingtheory.html
Lee Smolin: "So I've said, look, if the speed of light isn't
universal, that disconfirms string theory. But the string theorists
say they could probably invent versions of the theory that work either
way. We'd have to change our notion of what science is to accommodate
this proposition. You just can't do science on that basis."

"The next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner",
Einstein's 1905 false light postulate is a nightmare now, fat rat are
leaving the sinking ship in panic, even Einstein zombie world is not
singing "Divine Einstein" so fiercely:

http://www.newindpress.com/NewsItems...ence&Topic=166
"DOES Einstein need to be corrected? More specifically, does his
theory of relativity need correction? This might well be the case if
the recently launched telescope GLAST comes up with any new
information regarding the speed of light.....It has been observed that
both low energy and high-energy Gamma rays are emitted and they travel
at different speeds. Such phenomenon is an impossibility in terms of
the theory of relativity. Such differences in speeds are expected to
be picked up by the GLAST. Earth-based observatories have already
suggested that this indeed is happening."

Pentcho Valev