A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General Discussion
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

More evidence proving Apollo Hoax



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #361  
Old 3 Days Ago posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
spudnik
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

we got ya. "Hi, I'm 'Brad Guth.' Please,
don't bother me with any question at all
about my '60s occupation at the NASA Skunkworks Studio
in the Mojave Desert; it was all just too traumatic
to recall!"

so, how would *you* plan a mission to Moon,
supposedly starting from scratch?

I mean, you're supposed to be serious about wanting
to get that "Whistler's Mother's Moonscape
with Teeny-tiny Venusian Cresecnt at the End of Her Nose;"
are you not?

of cuorse, even if Venus was adequately exposed,
the stars might not be.

Spoken like a true brown-nosed minion/clown of your DARPA mainstream
status quo, just the way a devout diehard Zionist/Nazi would have it.


thus:
the quickest path between two places is a slalom
(brachistochrone or tautachrone per Liebniz' calculus.

I always thought that the efficient "burn" of fuel,
required burning throughout the trip,
halfway in acceleration & deceleration. it seems that
such speeds on the approach to Mars,
might strip its atmosphere, before you stopped (or,
the aerobrakeing'd take longer than the trip, or
cover a significant portion of Mars with the 'chute !-)

If you don't want to think about taking the trip to
the top of the mountain and the trip back will
be "basically free" then you don't get the fact about
shortest distance will use least fuel all the time.


thus:
I should add that these may be really important features
in the bugset:
your cones are not generally quadric surfaces, and
Joe's facets are not generally convex.

just because you guys tried to hide that, or
merely averted your eyes
in the patent-pending or paper-pretending,
doesn't mean it isn't "all good."

like, I'd call yours,"post-whacked dickonoids, " or
"flying funny shingles" or some thing; seriously ...
after a *lot* more of math, or at least systematic experiment
(that is to say, with a good write-up of observables,
not just a virtual tour of the latter-day shack).
http://uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/w...-20080624.html


--Seargent Barracks Soros McCheeny Pepper,
"Give jihad a chance in The Sudan, Rhodesia, and
other former colonial moments -- Yahoo!TM;
you're going to feel my computerized draft,
boys'n'girls: NO AMERICAN MIDDLESCHOOLER LEFT BEHIND;
NO RHODESIA SCHOLARS IN HARM'S WAY!"
http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3526...ros_pamph.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/35...parasites.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/3526zim_brit_op.html
Ads
  #362  
Old 3 Days Ago posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,474
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Jul 5, 1:25 pm, spudnik wrote:
we got ya. "Hi, I'm 'Brad Guth.' Please,
don't bother me with any question at all
about my '60s occupation at the NASA Skunkworks Studio
in the Mojave Desert; it was all just too traumatic
to recall!"

so, how would *you* plan a mission to Moon,
supposedly starting from scratch?


I'd first do a somewhat Clarke Station or Boeing Oasis (except far
better shielded plus outfitted with an artificial shade) as situated
within the moon's L1. The Guth LSE-CM/ISS is for later on, but we
could certainly make good use of either Clarke Station or the Boeing
Oasis in the mean time.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
  #363  
Old 3 Days Ago posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,474
Default More evidence proving Apollo Hoax

On Jul 5, 3:25 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 5, 1:25 pm, spudnik wrote:

we got ya. "Hi, I'm 'Brad Guth.' Please,
don't bother me with any question at all
about my '60s occupation at the NASA Skunkworks Studio
in the Mojave Desert; it was all just too traumatic
to recall!"


so, how would *you* plan a mission to Moon,
supposedly starting from scratch?


I'd first do a somewhat Clarke Station or Boeing Oasis (except far
better shielded plus outfitted with an artificial shade) as situated
within the moon's L1. The Guth LSE-CM/ISS is for later on, but we
could certainly make good use of either Clarke Station or the Boeing
Oasis in the mean time.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth


Where did DARPA spook/mole "spudnik" go?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA exposes Apollo Hoax G=EMC^2 Glazier Physics - General Discussion 0 October 17th 07 02:07 PM
Apollo XIIIX hoax Ken S. Tucker Physics - General Discussion 26 December 29th 05 10:15 AM
Apollo 13 Hoax??? JKF Physics - General Discussion 6 March 31st 05 08:43 PM
Any scientific evidence proving me wrong? Creative Music Synth [220] Physics - General Discussion 0 February 16th 04 06:16 PM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ Nathan Jones Physics - General Discussion 12 November 6th 03 05:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
MySpace Backgrounds - Debt Help - Bollywood Wallpapers - Mortgages - Mortgages