|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: apollo, evidence, hoax, proving |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
On Apr 22, 5:10 am, "CWatters"
wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Apr 21, 11:38 am, "CWatters" wrote: wrote in message ... On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: wrote: We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text - The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal. No it doesn't. 1) There were several ground stations recieving signals at the same time. 2) The ground stations would have noticed if the signal wasn't coming from the general direction of the moon. 3) They astronaughts couldn't have stayed on a line between the recieving station and the moon as there were multiple ground stations. At the very least one geostationary sat would have been required per ground station. Where is the moon's L1 ? (duh! general direction of the moon?) . - Brad Guth But the earth moon L1 isn't exactly "low earth orbit" now is it. Is that a trick question? Making their mission turn-around within the moon's L1 still isn't quite the same thing as a controlled deorbit from 100+ km, safely down- range to a soft landing and of walking moonsuit butt naked on the physically dark and nasty moon, now is it. .. - Brad Guth 
|
| Ads |
|
#62
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
Richard Henry wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote: Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...ms.selene.jaxa. jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_2/hdtv_002_2_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_3/hdtv_002_3_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_4/hdtv_002_4_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_5/hdtv_002_5_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/002/hdtv_002_6/hdtv_002_6_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/005/hdtv_005_4/hdtv_005_4_l.jpghttp://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hdtv/005/hdtv_005_2/hdtv_005_2_l.jpg Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ Oh. When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some evidence. Same here! All I see are orbital photos
|
|
#63
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 20, 8:15 pm, wrote: On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote: On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote: On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote: Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms... Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ Oh. When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some evidence. I want to see the flag Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag, there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned craft. The Apollo programme was a total hoax. What unmanned craft? Must be the one in Saturn 5?
|
|
#64
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
On Apr 22, 12:04 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 21, 10:53 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote: On Apr 21, 6:06 pm, JanPB wrote: 1. Who put the mirror lunar ranging equipment on the Moon? Little green men? The task could be achieved through unmanned missions not necessarily short men painted green. shrug What "unmanned missions" ? 2. Who was transmitting TV broadcast signals from the Moon at the time of Apollo missions (as shown by recently declassified Soviet spy antennas records)? Little green men? What is the nonsense about the Soviet soy antenna records? Is that where you got these little green men from? How do you suppose these Apollo astronauts with 0.25g/cm^2 of shield is going to come up totally unharmed after being bombarded with 3E-14 solar mass per year of energy? Little green men reported from unclassified Soviet antenna spy whatever archive? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_wind The higher energy particles would damage your DNA with higher probability of causing some sorts of cancer in a few years. The lower- energy ones would manifest shorter term illness. It is not advisable to be bombarded with 3E-14 solar mass per year of energy at earth’s orbit with just 0.25g/cm^2 of shielding from the command module. shrug Oh this again? You were proven wrong with the actual ACE/SOHO spacecraft data and here you are repeating the same **** again. Stop watching more useless films. Do the math yourself, film critic. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...msg/d787a05160 1... BTW, our naked moon is unavoidably reactive because it's made of such a hard density worth of matter, instead of a vapor/gas that's far less reactive, thus our physically dark and nasty moon is contributing it's secondary/recoil anticathode worth of gamma and hard-X-rays, like none other. Each and every one of those Apollo miisions to/from the moon were essentially a two-part series of their unmanned orbital missions that went onward from the moon's L1, into lunar orbiting and as best could deploying technology up until each of their hard/impact landings. At least that's pretty much the best we can manage to pull off as of today. . - Brad Guth
|
|
#65
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
On 21 Apr, 06:20, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote:
Dear john: "john" wrote in message ... ... When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some evidence. I want to see the flag With 40 years of bombardment by cosmic radiation and UV, it will be two "sticks" and tatters. David A. Smith And the car will lock like a piece of stone
|
|
#66
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
BradGuth wrote:
On Apr 20, 9:15 pm, wrote: On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote: On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote: On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote: Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms... Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ Oh. When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some evidence. I want to see the flag Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag, there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned craft. The Apollo programme was a total hoax. JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated) Their 10 meter resolution of those crisp TC obtained images are more than good enough to have shown us those NASA/Apollo landing sites. With a good PhotoShop enlargement (plus image stacking where needed) could make those 10m/pixel into nearly 1m/pixel. It's only going to get better, as time will eventually have the JAXA/ Selene orbiting at merely 10 km, giving us a raw 1m/pixel look at those supposed NASA/Apollo landing sites.. . - Brad Guth And wont you look Very foolish
|
|
#67
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
On Apr 21, 9:21 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
On Apr 21, 6:32 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Apr 21, 12:02 am, Eric Gisse wrote: On Apr 20, 9:22 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Apr 20, 9:15 pm, wrote: On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote: On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote: On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote: Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms... Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ Oh. When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some evidence. I want to see the flag Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag, there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned craft. The Apollo programme was a total hoax. JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated) Their 10 meter resolution of those crisp TC obtained images are more than good enough to have shown us those NASA/Apollo landing sites. With a good PhotoShop enlargement (plus image stacking where needed) could make those 10m/pixel into nearly 1m/pixel. Do you actually believe you can get a factor of ten increase in resolution from photoshop? I can accomplish 8X with reasonable results, a 5th grader should be able to accomplish 4X right off the bat. BTW, I'd said along with image stacking, although other than PhotoShop (perhaps PhotoZoom) can accomplish a little better job of enlarging to 10X without distorting one damn thing. A digital stack of 10 frames couldn't hurt. . - Brad Guth Explain to me how you obtain information that is not there with Photoshop. Image "stacking" doesn't remove the fact that the object in question is still smaller than the pixel size. It's only going to get better, as time will eventually have the JAXA/ Selene orbiting at merely 10 km, giving us a raw 1m/pixel look at those supposed NASA/Apollo landing sites.. . - Brad Guth China is planning on doing the same reduced orbital range, and thus offering more than sufficient raw resolution. . - Brad Guth So, no matters how reliable the raw pixels are, and of no matters how many images are stacked or having been properly resampled, you don't believe in anything that's enlarged unless it's of inert eye-candy. Are you also Muslim? Of course 100% of all cosmic eye-candy pictures that are published for public review are of those stacked, resampled and colorized to death, whereas oddly that's perfectly OK by your hocus-pocus standards. How interesting. .. - Brad Guth
|
|
#69
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
On Apr 22, 11:06 am, Igor wrote:
On Apr 21, 3:13 pm, BradGuth wrote: On Apr 21, 3:12 am, wrote: On Apr 21, 2:24 pm, Sam Wormley wrote: wrote: Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_7_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_8_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_000_9_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...v_000_10_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_1_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_2_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_001_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_1_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_2_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_3_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_5_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_002_6_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_4_l.jpg http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ We intercepted the live broadcast from the Moon in 1969 when I was in the Military.- Hide quoted text - The astronauts were in low-earth orbit. That accounts for that signal. In fact there was a massive blunder in one of the shoots where a fake far-away earth could be seen in one window then the real close-earth was briefly seen on another. Bart Sibrel found that one. Google it and you'll probably find it. I think as a brave crew they may have actually made it to/from the moon's L1, because that's technically doable via the Saturn V And it's all down hill from there and in both directions. So what the hell are you talking about? What's "down hill"? Isn't accomplishing the NASA/Apollo thing of getting our brave folks to/from the moon's L1, and of accomplishing all of that remote science of our moon impressive enough? (it certainly is for me, and it's most certainly better than anything USSR/Russia has ever accomplished) .. - Brad Guth
|
|
#70
April 22nd 08
posted to sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.math,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
More evidence proving Apollo Hoax
On Apr 22, 10:29 am, Hugh Semmler wrote:
BradGuth wrote: On Apr 20, 9:15 pm, wrote: On Apr 21, 2:12 pm, john wrote: On Apr 20, 10:08 pm, Richard Henry wrote: On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote: Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the fake ones from the Apollo hoax. http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd....jpghttp://wms... Find more at: http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/ Oh. When I read "More evidence..." I thought there would actually be some evidence. I want to see the flag Didn't hear about these photos on the media did you? There is no flag, there is no tracks, there are only retroflectors deployed via unmanned craft. The Apollo programme was a total hoax. JAXA/Selene doesn't exist as far as American mainstream media (mostly Jewish owned media, and otherwise government moderated) Their 10 meter resolution of those crisp TC obtained images are more than good enough to have shown us those NASA/Apollo landing sites. With a good PhotoShop enlargement (plus image stacking where needed) could make those 10m/pixel into nearly 1m/pixel. It's only going to get better, as time will eventually have the JAXA/ Selene orbiting at merely 10 km, giving us a raw 1m/pixel look at those supposed NASA/Apollo landing sites.. . - Brad Guth And wont you look Very foolish Nearly nine years and counting, haven't so far, and of others having this similar deductive mindset as of the very get-go are in the same boat. But then unlike yourself and others of your mostly Semitic and Third Reich brown-nosed kind, I'll go along with whatever's the best available science, especially if it's made fully objective by other than just within the NASA/Apollo O-Ring cult. .. - Brad Guth
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NASA exposes Apollo Hoax | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | October 17th 07 02:07 PM |
| Apollo XIIIX hoax | Ken S. Tucker | Physics - General Discussion | 26 | December 29th 05 10:15 AM |
| Apollo 13 Hoax??? | JKF | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | March 31st 05 08:43 PM |
| Any scientific evidence proving me wrong? | Creative Music Synth [220] | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | February 16th 04 06:16 PM |
| The Apollo Hoax FAQ | Nathan Jones | Physics - General Discussion | 12 | November 6th 03 05:58 AM |
Linear Mode
