we got ya. "Hi, I'm 'Brad Guth.' Please,
don't bother me with any question at all
about my '60s occupation at the NASA Skunkworks Studio
in the Mojave Desert; it was all just too traumatic
to recall!"

so, how would *you* plan a mission to Moon,
supposedly starting from scratch?

I mean, you're supposed to be serious about wanting
to get that "Whistler's Mother's Moonscape
with Teeny-tiny Venusian Cresecnt at the End of Her Nose;"
are you not?

of cuorse, even if Venus was adequately exposed,
the stars might not be.

Spoken like a true brown-nosed minion/clown of your DARPA mainstream
status quo, just the way a devout diehard Zionist/Nazi would have it.

thus:
the quickest path between two places is a slalom
(brachistochrone or tautachrone per Liebniz' calculus.

I always thought that the efficient "burn" of fuel,
required burning throughout the trip,
halfway in acceleration & deceleration. it seems that
such speeds on the approach to Mars,
might strip its atmosphere, before you stopped (or,
the aerobrakeing'd take longer than the trip, or
cover a significant portion of Mars with the 'chute !-)

If you don't want to think about taking the trip to
the top of the mountain and the trip back will
be "basically free" then you don't get the fact about
shortest distance will use least fuel all the time.

thus:
I should add that these may be really important features
in the bugset:
your cones are not generally quadric surfaces, and
Joe's facets are not generally convex.

just because you guys tried to hide that, or
merely averted your eyes
in the patent-pending or paper-pretending,
doesn't mean it isn't "all good."

like, I'd call yours,"post-whacked dickonoids, " or
"flying funny shingles" or some thing; seriously ...
after a *lot* more of math, or at least systematic experiment
(that is to say, with a good write-up of observables,
not just a virtual tour of the latter-day shack).
http://uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/w...-20080624.html

--Seargent Barracks Soros McCheeny Pepper,
"Give jihad a chance in The Sudan, Rhodesia, and
other former colonial moments -- Yahoo!TM;
you're going to feel my computerized draft,
boys'n'girls: NO AMERICAN MIDDLESCHOOLER LEFT BEHIND;
NO RHODESIA SCHOLARS IN HARM'S WAY!"
http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3526...ros_pamph.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/35...parasites.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/3526zim_brit_op.html

On Jul 5, 1:25 pm, spudnik wrote:
we got ya. "Hi, I'm 'Brad Guth.' Please,
don't bother me with any question at all
about my '60s occupation at the NASA Skunkworks Studio
in the Mojave Desert; it was all just too traumatic
to recall!"

so, how would *you* plan a mission to Moon,
supposedly starting from scratch?

I'd first do a somewhat Clarke Station or Boeing Oasis (except far
better shielded plus outfitted with an artificial shade) as situated
within the moon's L1. The Guth LSE-CM/ISS is for later on, but we
could certainly make good use of either Clarke Station or the Boeing
Oasis in the mean time.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

On Jul 5, 3:25 pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jul 5, 1:25 pm, spudnik wrote:

we got ya. "Hi, I'm 'Brad Guth.' Please,
don't bother me with any question at all
about my '60s occupation at the NASA Skunkworks Studio
in the Mojave Desert; it was all just too traumatic
to recall!"

so, how would *you* plan a mission to Moon,
supposedly starting from scratch?

I'd first do a somewhat Clarke Station or Boeing Oasis (except far
better shielded plus outfitted with an artificial shade) as situated
within the moon's L1. The Guth LSE-CM/ISS is for later on, but we
could certainly make good use of either Clarke Station or the Boeing
Oasis in the mean time.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

Where did DARPA spook/mole "spudnik" go?

had to poop;
looked just like your ****!

personally, I don't do *any* research within the googolplex,
other than looking at links given if the newsgroups
by my fellow DARPAnauts. the stuff I need is only in books.

I'd first do a somewhat Clarke Station or Boeing Oasis (except far
better shielded plus outfitted with an artificial shade) as situated
within the moon's L1. *The Guth LSE-CM/ISS is for later on, but we
could certainly make good use of either Clarke Station or the Boeing
Oasis in the mean time.

Where did DARPA spook/mole "spudnik" go?

ths:
only that there is no absolute vacuum per Blaise Pascal's experiment
-- he didn't know about partial pressures --
so no "final" value of c, unless it can be calculated
from other known constants & "an ideal region of perfectly empty
space;"
ours is close-enough for all work.

Newton's corpuscles were sum-totally alleviated
by Young's experiments: all essential properties are those
of waves, aside from the seeming ballisticness of the photoelectric
effect, or
when Moon hits your eye like that.

Roswell is strictly a psychological "denial" of the people
of the area about its two elements of cache from around WW2,
as well as a sort of tourist attraction (couldn't be that large,
though .-)

"faster than light" is an idea that is required
by no known physical principles, other than "hard SF,"
the same as multiverses et al ad vomitorium.

If the light postulate is true, then miraculous effects (time
dilation, length contraction etc.) do exist and Einstein is at least
one of the discoverers of the fantastic world we live in. However if
the light postulate is false, that is, if the speed of light obeys
Newton's model presenting light as discontinuous bullet-like particles
and disobeys Maxwell's model presenting light as discontinuous field,
then Einstein's 1954 confession resolves all remaining problems:

http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf...0-433a-b7e3-4a...
Albert Einstein: "I consider it entirely possible that physics cannot
be based upon the field concept, that is on continuous structures.
Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in the air, including the
theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the rest of contemporary
physics."

thus:
he didn't get that with my example of slaloms,
that he applied to skiing, either, but you have to realize that
the "straight line," even if it exists in a particular stretch,
is also a slalom/brachistochrone/tautochrone. so, I just realized,
the fact that it takes longer to fall from a higher heighth,
is partly a result of "terminal velocity" with air drag.

It seems that the theory from which his "laws of inertia" are derived
excludes the Sun's gravity as a "physical cause". If it works anywhere
at all, that could only be in a very small box.

thus:
well, obviously, the gallilean principle of relativity;

--Seargent Barracks Soros McCheeny Pepper,
"Give jihad a chance in The Sudan, Rhodesia, and
other former colonial moments -- Yahoo!TM;
you're going to feel my computerized draft,
boys'n'girls: NO AMERICAN MIDDLESCHOOLER LEFT BEHIND;
NO RHODESIA SCHOLARS IN HARM'S WAY!"
http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3526...ros_pamph.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/35...parasites.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/3526zim_brit_op.html

In article
,
spudnik wrote:

ths:
only that there is no absolute vacuum per Blaise Pascal's experiment
-- he didn't know about partial pressures --
so no "final" value of c, unless it can be calculated
from other known constants & "an ideal region of perfectly empty
space;"
ours is close-enough for all work.

Well ... I suspect that physicists smashing tiny little things into each
other reeally reaally fast have calculated to a rather high accuracy how
much mass they gain from how fast they go. Numerous other experiments
such as ones having to do with time dilation affecting various nuclear
decay rates have no doubt supplied additional data. So I think that even
though photons in a perfect vacuum haven't had their speed measured, the
speed they would go if such were available is known to a fairly high
precision.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.

On Jul 8, 9:53 pm, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,

spudnik wrote:
ths:
only that there is no absolute vacuum per Blaise Pascal's experiment
-- he didn't know about partial pressures --
so no "final" value of c, unless it can be calculated
from other known constants & "an ideal region of perfectly empty
space;"
ours is close-enough for all work.

Well ... I suspect that physicists smashing tiny little things into each
other reeally reaally fast have calculated to a rather high accuracy how
much mass they gain from how fast they go. Numerous other experiments
such as ones having to do with time dilation affecting various nuclear
decay rates have no doubt supplied additional data. So I think that even
though photons in a perfect vacuum haven't had their speed measured, the
speed they would go if such were available is known to a fairly high
precision.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot comhttp://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.

At encountering a few as 1 atom/km3 is where the speed of a photon
could get interesting. However, can photons exist/coexist without
atoms?

The all-inclusive universe isn't likely worth much greater than one
atom per km3, and lord only knows whatever's inside of black holes or
what makes up dark matter and dark energy (if not other photons or
perhaps antimatter).

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

On Jun 22, 4:04*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 20, 7:06 pm, wrote:





On Apr 24, 2:37 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 23, 9:02 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 23, 7:21 am, wrote:

On Apr 22, 6:02 am, BradGuth wrote:

[...]

So was WWII, the mutually perpetrated cold-war and lo and behold, now
we're looking at WWIII just around the bloody fossil fuel corner.

On Jul 21, 6:50 am, wrote:
On Jun 22, 4:04 pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Jun 20, 7:06 pm, wrote:

On Apr 24, 2:37 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 23, 9:02 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 23, 7:21 am, wrote:

On Apr 22, 6:02 am, BradGuth wrote:

[...]

So was WWII, the mutually perpetrated cold-war and lo and behold, now
we're looking at WWIII just around the bloody fossil fuel corner.
. - Brad Guth

For them it's WW4. It looks like they're going to attempt it. It seems
that this time they will fail - and fail big.

Notice how these rich and powerful (mostly Jewish) folks never have a
bad word to say about their new and improved cost of energy, that
which has only inflated by 3200% in 60 years.

At this point, even another WW by conventional standards is going to
be fossil and synfuel energy spendy as hell, of which leaves us with
having to use their thermal nuclear and VX options as a preemptive
strike against all those considered as less than sufficiently Semitic/
Zionist (aka Third Reich) worthy.
. - Brad Guth

BTW, notice how it's only the pretend-atheist Jews of DARPA that are
continually upset with deductive notions other than scripted by their
NASA/Apollo cult.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

There are a group of Jews who dominate the world. They created the
"anti-semitism" mind-control program to move their Jewish sheeple from
around the world into the desert of Israel.

If you actually look at the archeological evidence, the real Jews -
the children of israel - are the African blacks.

The Jews enslaved by the Egyptians weren't the white Khazars - they
were the blacks from Africa, just like the ancient Egyptions were.

I have to refresh my brief look into this, but as far as I can
remember
- The true holy land is Ethiopia.
- Ethiopia was the greek translation of the name of one of Noah's
sons
- Ancient egyptian artifacts imply that their slaves - called the
Jews now - were a black race from africa.

If you just look at the data, you'll see that all cultures/religions/
countries/beliefs are total lies.

It seems the devout Old Testament tribe of white Zionists are the
major culprits in far too many instances. Which other planet or solar
system do you think they came from?

Jews are DEFINED by anti-semitism. Take away anti-semitism, there is
no Jewry. They are not a consistent race, religion or culture. They
only exist in union out of "fear" of the non-jew. That is how they are
herded, and that is how they will be led to the slaughter (unless they
wake up).

The levels above the bankers and military industrial complex is
dominated by "subconcious forces".

To make a long story short, there appear to be beings that exist
outside our "spectrum of reality" and who are able to come into it our
reality and participate within it. Freemasons and satanic people have
known this for quite some time. They called them "demons", "angels'
and "Gods". Now they are called "aliens".

Whatever you call them they come in all shapes an sizes. There are
life far, Far, FAR, FAR^FAR^FAR superior to humans exist beyond
unfathomable limits. They transcend all our notions of existence.

You can consider them "multidimensional" beings who exist through time
and past the death barrier. They exist through time and beyond our
understanding in every conceivable way. To them we are like a fish
being ripped out of water for the first time.

Once you understand you are not at the top of the food chain, it all
becomes clear.

I mean, just think of the odds of being a member of the one species
that actually IS at the top of the food chain. Math does not lie.


That's a good analogy, not that ETs are planning upon eating us any
time soon (after all, they might be vegetarians or mineraltarians).

What do you think about those substantial artificial structures and
the clearly intelligent infrastructure that can be seen as rational
and existing/coexisting on Venus?

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

conjuring scifi is silly; it has always been a haven
of supersillyousness or outright spookery, as per "flatland"
by the ridiculous A.A.Skwared, 4D BS from the British Pyschol. Society
etc., and
the latterday mongering of timespace -- the arbitrary spacialization
of time by means of a diagram, which is supposed to be an *aid*
to comprehension of phasespace, not a "reified" ideal of itself,
per Minkowski's youthful exhuberance. (y'know,
Minkowski's stuff is really mathematically worthwhile,
otherwise ... "no, please, don't, stop -- mathematics ?!?!")

*a priori* assumptions of megalithic structures on Venus,
like Hoagland's Balls on Mars foolishness,
really requires an actual program o'space to investigate, since
nature is capable of quite awesome geometries(or
'hype-D physiques'); however, that was shotdown with Kennedy & Nixon:
just as with our nuclear energy, we are still using '50s technology
from the planet Marduk (per ScientologyTM .-)

You can consider them "multidimensional" beings who exist through time
and past the death barrier. They exist through time and beyond our
understanding in every conceivable way. To them we are like a fish
being ripped out of water for the first time.

What do you think about those substantial artificial structures and
the clearly intelligent infrastructure that can be seen as rational
and existing/coexisting on Venus?

thus:
that which causes the matter of "time slowing"
in acceleration, is really the same as matter being energy,
somehow, via their proportionality with c,
the speed of light; that's incredibly obvious, although
I know of no school of quantum, that says,
how many quants of light make a proton e.g. (and,
since the "photons" come in all sizes, it's moot .-)

in any case, this is one of the properties of light
that was experimentally verified in the 19th cce, although
it is carachteristically never even mentioned,
in favor of one of the EinsteinHubbleGodot paradoxi/
doctrines of the Department of Einsteinmania/
the Musical Department!

thus:
superstringtheory at least gets rid of that point,
from the get-go & without further a-do, even if
it's not just a string, a "one-dimensional object" ...
howsoever it is that matter bends space,
as measured by Gauss for the government of France
in the 19th cce, and experimentally adduced
by the classical Greek geometers, light travels
through this bent medium, which apparently also
alters the shape of it -- no timespace utterances needed,
it's so very, blatantly bended-up!

Roswell is a big double-entendre from WW2, but you could see that
those who embrace it could go no further. that is really the gist
of the "Lt.Col. Corso School" of Roswellology, that
virtually *all* of 20th cce science & technology
[http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/]
came out of Corso's very own dyspersal of the pile of crap
that fell out of the sky, there, to "some big corporations;"
mayhap, he also wrote the first press-release -- too bad,
he had to wait til he was at death's door, to reap the deal
for the book.

that is to say,
humans are incapable of generating ideas ... or,
it just applies to Americans!

Einstein was not a hoax, you are. There IS a Roswell hoax, there was

--Seargent Barracks Soros McCheeny Pepper,
"Give jihad a chance in The Sudan, Rhodesia, and
other former colonial moments -- Yahoo!TM;
you're going to feel my computerized draft,
boys'n'girls: NO AMERICAN MIDDLESCHOOLER LEFT BEHIND;
NO RHODESIA SCHOLARS IN HARM'S WAY!"
http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3526...ros_pamph.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/35...parasites.html
http://larouchepub.com/other/2008/3526zim_brit_op.html

On Jul 21, 9:26 pm, wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:05 am, BradGuth wrote:



On Jul 21, 6:50 am, wrote:

On Jun 22, 4:04 pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Jun 20, 7:06 pm, wrote:

On Apr 24, 2:37 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 23, 9:02 am, BradGuth wrote:

On Apr 23, 7:21 am, wrote:

On Apr 22, 6:02 am, BradGuth wrote:

[...]

So was WWII, the mutually perpetrated cold-war and lo and behold, now
we're looking at WWIII just around the bloody fossil fuel corner.
. - Brad Guth

For them it's WW4. It looks like they're going to attempt it. It seems
that this time they will fail - and fail big.

Notice how these rich and powerful (mostly Jewish) folks never have a
bad word to say about their new and improved cost of energy, that
which has only inflated by 3200% in 60 years.

At this point, even another WW by conventional standards is going to
be fossil and synfuel energy spendy as hell, of which leaves us with
having to use their thermal nuclear and VX options as a preemptive
strike against all those considered as less than sufficiently Semitic/
Zionist (aka Third Reich) worthy.
. - Brad Guth

BTW, notice how it's only the pretend-atheist Jews of DARPA that are
continually upset with deductive notions other than scripted by their
NASA/Apollo cult.
. - Brad Guth- Hide quoted text -

There are a group of Jews who dominate the world. They created the
"anti-semitism" mind-control program to move their Jewish sheeple from
around the world into the desert of Israel.

If you actually look at the archeological evidence, the real Jews -
the children of israel - are the African blacks.

The Jews enslaved by the Egyptians weren't the white Khazars - they
were the blacks from Africa, just like the ancient Egyptions were.

I have to refresh my brief look into this, but as far as I can
remember
- The true holy land is Ethiopia.
- Ethiopia was the greek translation of the name of one of Noah's
sons
- Ancient egyptian artifacts imply that their slaves - called the
Jews now - were a black race from africa.

If you just look at the data, you'll see that all cultures/religions/
countries/beliefs are total lies.

It seems the devout Old Testament tribe of white Zionists are the
major culprits in far too many instances. Which other planet or solar
system do you think they came from?

Jews are DEFINED by anti-semitism. Take away anti-semitism, there is
no Jewry. They are not a consistent race, religion or culture. They
only exist in union out of "fear" of the non-jew. That is how they are
herded, and that is how they will be led to the slaughter (unless they
wake up).

The levels above the bankers and military industrial complex is
dominated by "subconcious forces".

To make a long story short, there appear to be beings that exist
outside our "spectrum of reality" and who are able to come into it our
reality and participate within it. Freemasons and satanic people have
known this for quite some time. They called them "demons", "angels'
and "Gods". Now they are called "aliens".

Whatever you call them they come in all shapes an sizes. There are
life far, Far, FAR, FAR^FAR^FAR superior to humans exist beyond
unfathomable limits. They transcend all our notions of existence.

You can consider them "multidimensional" beings who exist through time
and past the death barrier. They exist through time and beyond our
understanding in every conceivable way. To them we are like a fish
being ripped out of water for the first time.

Once you understand you are not at the top of the food chain, it all
becomes clear.

I mean, just think of the odds of being a member of the one species
that actually IS at the top of the food chain. Math does not lie.

That's a good analogy, not that ETs are planning upon eating us any
time soon (after all, they might be vegetarians or mineraltarians).

Nature tells us life eats life.

Superior beings exist and likely will eat humans.

Superior beings will not only eat us, but are eating us right now, and
have been doing so since day 1.

ET microbes and spores have likely been easting us alive and dead
since the the very get-go. From your first hand expertise, exactly
how nutritious and tasty are humans?


Could we not be their creations, farmed for their nourishment?

Could they not shear humans of their soul as a farmer sheers a sheep
of its wool?

Theirs is a hunger satisfied by emotions - fear, guilt, shame, pride
and desire.

Ask yourself do humans genetically engineer pigs for the benefit of
the pig or for the human?

What do you think about those substantial artificial structures and
the clearly intelligent infrastructure that can be seen as rational
and existing/coexisting on Venus?

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

All good and valid points worth consideration. However, what about
those intelligent souls, microbes and spores existing/coexisting on
Venus?

Are you vision impaired, or perhaps just unable to deductively figure
anything of honest observationology out for yourself?

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth