On May 1, 8:41*pm, BradGuth wrote:
SNIP!

Yet you never addressed head on my point. Namely,
that the two look much like each other (albeit the new
photos are of much better quality than the stuff from
the 60s and 70s). That suggests the Real Moon was
filmed by Apollo, not a fake moon.

On May 17, 1:42 am, mike3 wrote:
On May 1, 8:41 pm, BradGuth wrote:
SNIP!

Yet you never addressed head on my point. Namely,
that the two look much like each other (albeit the new
photos are of much better quality than the stuff from
the 60s and 70s). That suggests the Real Moon was
filmed by Apollo, not a fake moon.

I never once said those Apollo images obtained from orbit were not of
our moon.

Did you miss out on reading-101, or was it comprehension-101 ?
.. - Brad Guth

On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from theApollohoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/

Lunar Meteorites or Lunaites / Labenne Meteorites :
Besides the matter of peer replicated fact that on average our moon’s
surface is nearly as dark as coal, and yet most of those Apollo rocks
and crystal like soil were for the most part of a medium to light
grayish form of basalt, with only somewhat minor portions of those
coal like dark basalt areas.

BTW, I seem to have a few of my very own moon rocks (via lunar
meteorites, as should most anyone if they’d care to look around their
two left feet), though possibly my most recent fines are merely parts
of whatever could have impacted our moon.

Each of these mostly basalt items are looking exactly as though having
been reentry fired, as having been nicely glazed hot enough to have
melted one or more sides.

One of the two larger items is nearly a clean solid (as though a blow-
out from a geode rock), with one side fully fused and the bulk of its
remainder as the deep brownish olive-green basalt, and of course
having those pesky magnetic minerals.

There are no apparent sediment layers or indications of anything
terrestrial, however on the larger piece there’s quite possibly a
nickel like substance plus the back side showing some deep brownish
pockets or composites of equally hard as basalt rock or glassy fused
substance (could be a mix of iron and manganese).

These meteorites are not yet Labenne certified, though otherwise very
much basalt dark when wet (but noticeably heavier) with a good
magnetic mineral content and when dry in good daylight seem a touch
olive-green. At any rate, these seem potentially related to one
another, mostly because they were found within the same square meter
of our extremely rocky soil.

There are some fairly interesting items or unusual looking things
trapped along side or even a bit inside of the crevices and multiple
pores. (far more interesting than anything contributed by our supposed
NASA/Apollo missions)

BTW, a while back we heard the sonic crack (very sharp/crisp bang) as
of roughly 6 months ago, and only just now not got around to doing our
gardening where these meteorites (possibly lunaites) were discovered.

A little friendly warning for those thinking naughty thoughts; for
the moment these are in a safe/hidden place, and I’m packing heat.
Meaning, you really should call before stopping by for any personal
look-see.
. – Brad Guth

www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:34:37 -0400, www.freedomtofascism.com
wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:20:21 -0400, www.freedomtofascism.com
wrote:

The electronics will fail to function when the Morgellons gets more wide
spread too.

crickets
crickets
crickets
--
ah

www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:42:19 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:

On May 14, 4:37 pm, www.freedomtofascism.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 00:27:18
wrote:



The electronics will fail to function when the Morgellons gets more wide
spread too.

crickets
crickets
crickets
crickets

crickets
non-sequitur snipped

crickets prevail

crickets
--
ah

On May 19, 8:57*pm, ah wrote:
www.freedomtofascism.comwrote:
On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:42:19 -0700 (PDT), BradGuth
wrote:

On May 14, 4:37 wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 00:27:18
wrote:

The electronics will fail to function when the Morgellons gets more wide
spread too.

crickets
crickets
crickets
crickets

crickets
non-sequitur snipped

crickets prevail

crickets
--
ah

Buddy Holly and the crickets?:

http://www.morethings.com/music/budd...n_Crickets.jpg

Jiminy crickets? - Not for ah or Art Deco!:

http://entrylevelheiress.typepad.com...dangerous.html

where do you get that "dark as coal" **** --
does coal really look that bright, on a clear night
with a full Moon?

#1 lunar problem -- the oldest -- is the "moon illusion."

so, you just cannot find Venus' phase-seen-from-Earth-orbit
at those times, from inside of your Jet Propulsion Lab bubble-suit?

that's what I've thought, for months, but, I still want to know,
where was Venus during those alleged landings, with respect to Earth
(or
Moon) and Sun?... a planar approximation will do, for now (say,
relative angle from Sun with those two heavenly bodies --
we'll pretend, we're foating "north" of the ecliptic,
a hundred AUs away -- looks fkat .-)

if you cannot take the heat,
jump out of the frying pan, dood!

On the one side, such voluntary powers are expressed, when they are
for the good, by the special quality of modern great discoverers from
among such European scientific figures as Nicholas of Cusa, Leonardo
da Vinci, Johannes Kepler, Pierre de Fermat, Gottfried Leibniz, et al.http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3519wells_cesspool.html

Perhaps I should put this in terms a 5th grader could fully

thus:
well, not a moment too soon,
to decelerate the grain cartel's ethanol-fed dustbowl
in the Midwest ... hopefully.
http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/uniini/p...articleID=1613

thus:
otherwise, coal's a very (?) important feedstock. so,
what is the sustainable production of natural gas & natural oil?...
Atoms, Machiavelli, Machiavelli & Oil need a figure
for the venture ads!... coal, we know from its pre-fossil
formations,
to be produced catastrophically; the burial
of whole, swampy ecosystems.
Yucca Flats is a farce majeur, even if
there's any thing left to bury, by the time it'd open, or
by noon, Pacific Time.

thus:
the Brooklyn Bridge is a powerful metaphor, but
it has to be told in the context of its manifestation
as David McCullough's first production for PBS:
his first, big SALE, in other word,
to the "eastern liberal establishment" of Wall Street,
the District of Columbia and protege Ken "Civil War Jazzbo" Burns.

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?...
Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as
of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?

--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 9 (Deuterocanonicos):
Prisoners of the Guantanamo Episcopate/poolcess!...
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050..._food_res.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/080426gore_ethanol.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...ls_v_food.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...larouches.html
http://larouchepub.com/pr_lar/2008/l...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

On May 20, 2:02 pm, Major Quaternion Dirt Quantum
wrote:
where do you get that "dark as coal" **** --
does coal really look that bright, on a clear night
with a full Moon?

#1 lunar problem -- the oldest -- is the "moon illusion."

so, you just cannot find Venus' phase-seen-from-Earth-orbit
at those times, from inside of your Jet Propulsion Lab bubble-suit?

that's what I've thought, for months, but, I still want to know,
where was Venus during those alleged landings, with respect to Earth
(or
Moon) and Sun?... a planar approximation will do, for now (say,
relative angle from Sun with those two heavenly bodies --
we'll pretend, we're foating "north" of the ecliptic,
a hundred AUs away -- looks fkat .-)

if you cannot take the heat,
jump out of the frying pan, dood!

On the one side, such voluntary powers are expressed, when they are
for the good, by the special quality of modern great discoverers from
among such European scientific figures as Nicholas of Cusa, Leonardo
da Vinci, Johannes Kepler, Pierre de Fermat, Gottfried Leibniz, et al.http://larouchepub.com/lar/2008/3519wells_cesspool.html

Perhaps I should put this in terms a 5th grader could fully

thus:
well, not a moment too soon,
to decelerate the grain cartel's ethanol-fed dustbowl
in the Midwest ... hopefully.

http://www.newsdesk.umd.edu/uniini/p...articleID=1613

thus:
otherwise, coal's a very (?) important feedstock. so,
what is the sustainable production of natural gas & natural oil?...
Atoms, Machiavelli, Machiavelli & Oil need a figure
for the venture ads!... coal, we know from its pre-fossil
formations,
to be produced catastrophically; the burial
of whole, swampy ecosystems.
Yucca Flats is a farce majeur, even if
there's any thing left to bury, by the time it'd open, or
by noon, Pacific Time.

thus:
the Brooklyn Bridge is a powerful metaphor, but
it has to be told in the context of its manifestation
as David McCullough's first production for PBS:
his first, big SALE, in other word,
to the "eastern liberal establishment" of Wall Street,
the District of Columbia and protege Ken "Civil War Jazzbo" Burns.

thus:
so, did you recalibrate the orbital constraints
in your JPL publicdomain trajectories,
to include the phasal parameter "as 'seen' from Earth?..."
was Venus closer to conjunction or opposition
to Earth, during those alleged missions?...

Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as
of missions A-11, A-14 and A-16?

--Harry of Darfuria, Episode 9 (Deuterocanonicos):
Prisoners of the Guantanamo Episcopate/poolcess!...http://larouchepub.com/pr/2008/08050...rank_hbpa.html

"We Cesspools are not to be sniffed at!"
—Lady Cesspool in Al Capp's "Li'l Abner" Cartoon Strip

Coal is actually much darker than our moon, at roughly an albedo of
0.1 or 10% reflective, whereas our dusty old moon average albedo is
0.11 or 11%. Now if Venus were in orbit of Earth so as to appear the
same visual size as our moon, we’d be literally blinded by the light.

Of course when that lunar terrain gets viewed and/or photographed
through a polarized optical element (such as while you’re situated
upon the surface of that nearly coal like moon), as such would have
made that coal look even darker, and otherwise rather especially
contrasty with having such a singular and nearly point-source of
illumination as represented by our raw sun illuminating upon our naked
moon that’s unavoidably reactive to such UV energy. But then if you
were a fifth grader you’d already know all of that.

Only the superior dynamic range of the JAXA/Selene TC(terrain camera)
makes the best of that otherwise extremely contrasty situation, as
well as their being able to extract or exclude the horrific amount of
that bluish/purple spectrum saturated environment, that’s directly
caused by the secondary/recoil from all of that raw UV energy, and
their HDTV cameras are simply having to entirely exclude the
mineralogy worth of lunar surface colors because of the saturation of
UV that skews most everything into the bluish/purple hue.

BTW, the raw solar illumination as having loads of UV is nothing at
all like the xenon arc lamp spectrum which illuminated the NASA/Apollo
moon, that which for the most part seemed to look almost exactly like
a modified terrestrial guano island that’s oddly now a UN member (made
so shortly after their loyal assistance).

Secondly, a fully 3D interactive version of most any orbital simulator
can place your eyes as though situated upon any planet or moon at any
given location per given time, as well as for looking off in any given
direction, along with most any specified FOV. Our DARPA/NASA has
always had this capability since the invention of the supercomputer,
and yet we’re not allowed access because it might hurt something (like
our being snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return).
. - Brad Guth

On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:39:09 -0400, www.freedomtofascism.com
wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:34:37 -0400, www.freedomtofascism.com
wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2008 19:20:21 -0400, www.freedomtofascism.com
wrote:

The electronics will fail to function when the Morgellons gets more wide
spread too.

crickets
crickets
crickets

Moon meteorite (nearly dark as coal)

I have recently uncovered several closely associated meteorites, or
at least pieces of the same encounter that sent them towards Earth and
into my garden, that could very well be those of a lunar meteorite.

Lunar Meteorites or Lunaites / Labenne Meteorites :
Besides the matter of peer replicated fact that on average our moon’s
physical surface is nearly as dark as coal, and yet most of those
Apollo rocks and crystal like soil were for the most part of a medium
to light grayish form of basalt, with only somewhat minor portions of
those coal like dark basalt considerations.

I seem to have a few of my very own moon rocks (via lunar meteorites),
as should most anyone if they’d care to look around their two left
dumbfounded feet, though possibly my most recent fines are merely
parts of whatever could have impacted our moon.

Each of these mostly basalt items are looking exactly as though having
been reentry fired, as having been nicely glazed hot enough to have
melted one or more sides.

One of the two larger items is nearly a clean solid (as though a blow-
out from a geode rock), with one side fully fused and the bulk of its
remainder as the deep brownish olive-green basalt, and of course
having those pesky magnetic minerals.

There are no apparent sediment layers or indications of anything
terrestrial, however on the larger piece there’s quite possibly a
nickel like substance plus the back side showing some deep brownish
pockets or composites of equally hard as basalt rock or glassy fused
substance (could be a mix of iron and manganese).

These meteorites are not as of yet Labenne certified, though otherwise
very much basalt dark as coal when wet (but noticeably heavier) with a
good magnetic mineral content and when dry in good daylight seem a
touch olive-green. At any rate, these each seem potentially related
to one another, mostly because they were found within the same square
meter of our extremely rocky soil.

There are some fairly interesting items or unusual looking things
trapped along side or even a bit inside of the crevices and multiple
pores. (far more interesting than anything contributed by our supposed
NASA/Apollo missions)

BTW, a while back we heard the sonic crack (very sharp/crisp bang) as
of roughly 6 months ago, and only just now not got around to doing our
gardening where these meteorites (possibly lunaites) were discovered.

A little friendly warning for those thinking naughty thoughts; for
the moment these are in a safe/hidden place, and I’m packing heat.
Meaning, you really should call (253-8576061) before stopping by for
any personal look-see.
. – Brad Guth


On Apr 20, 9:04 pm, wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of theLunarsurface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/data/en/hd...tv_005_2_l.jpg

Find more at:

http://wms.selene.jaxa.jp/