BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 10:37 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 2:01 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.
Tell me this then. What _exactly_ did happen?
Martin Hogbin
We've done that at least a million times. Didn't do any good, did it.
One more time would not hurt then. How did they fake it?

Martin Hogbin

I take it that your PC/MAC doesn't do any "search for" basics.

Ever heard of utilizing our moon's L1? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of Nauru (aka guano island)? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of a Chapel Bell S-Band transponder? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of UV secondary/recoil black-light giving a bluish/purplish
hue or tint to most everything in sight? (didn't think so)

All you can do is bluff and bluster. Why not answer my
question? What did they do to fake the landing?

Martin Hogbin

On May 6, 12:45 pm, Don Stockbauer wrote:
On May 6, 11:43 am, BradGuth wrote:



On May 6, 10:37 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:

BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 2:01 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.
Tell me this then. What _exactly_ did happen?

Martin Hogbin

We've done that at least a million times. Didn't do any good, did it.

One more time would not hurt then. How did they fake it?

Martin Hogbin

I take it that your PC/MAC doesn't do any "search for" basics.

Ever heard of utilizing our moon's L1? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of Nauru (aka guano island)? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of a Chapel Bell S-Band transponder? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of UV secondary/recoil black-light giving a bluish/purplish
hue or tint to most everything in sight? (didn't think so)
. - Brad Guth

They faked it from a small asteroid orbitingAlpha Centauri.

Or perhaps from an asteroid near the causal horizon?

On May 6, 3:22 pm, Martin Hogbin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 10:37 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 2:01 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.
Tell me this then. What _exactly_ did happen?
Martin Hogbin
We've done that at least a million times. Didn't do any good, did it.
One more time would not hurt then. How did they fake it?

Martin Hogbin

I take it that your PC/MAC doesn't do any "search for" basics.

Ever heard of utilizing our moon's L1? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of Nauru (aka guano island)? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of a Chapel Bell S-Band transponder? (didn't think so)

Ever heard of UV secondary/recoil black-light giving a bluish/purplish
hue or tint to most everything in sight? (didn't think so)

All you can do is bluff and bluster. Why not answer my
question? What did they do to fake the landing?

Martin Hogbin

Are we being funny? Why of course, funny.

Where's Venus (from orbit or surface EVA) as of missions A-11, A-14
and A-16?

They/Apollo simply faked anything and everything having to do with the
moon's surface, and of those essentially naked EVAs is just the best
ever hoax icing on their moon landing cake.

BTW, our physically dark moon isn't illuminated by way of any xenon
arc lamp spectrum.
.. - Brad Guth

On May 6, 10:36 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
Martin Hogbin wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.

Tell me this then. What _exactly_ did happen?

It is telling that no one has answered this simple
question. If the mood landings were faked, how exactly
did they do it. This is the question the moon landing
conspiracy crackpots cannot answer.

Martin Hogbin

Finding one fault with the NASA/Apollo holy grail is all it takes.
We've found dozens of faults. Your being in denial of being in denial
isn't helping, is it.

We can also tell, you're having a very bad feeling about this.
.. - Brad Guth

BradGuth wrote:

Are we being funny?

It is a simple, straight forward question. I want you
to tell me exactly how you believe the moon landings
were faked.

You seem completely unable to do this and thus you have
no case.


They/Apollo simply faked anything and everything having to do with the
moon's surface, and of those essentially naked EVAs is just the best
ever hoax icing on their moon landing cake.

That is start. Let me help you a bit as you do not
seem to be able to answer a simple question on your own.

Who exactly are 'They/Apollo'?

What did they do?

Martin Hogbin

BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 10:36 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
Martin Hogbin wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.
Tell me this then. What _exactly_ did happen?
It is telling that no one has answered this simple
question. If the mood landings were faked, how exactly
did they do it. This is the question the moon landing
conspiracy crackpots cannot answer.

Martin Hogbin

Finding one fault with the NASA/Apollo holy grail is all it takes.
We've found dozens of faults. Your being in denial of being in denial
isn't helping, is it.

I cannot be in denial - you have not given me anything
to deny.

Martin Hogbin

On May 7, 1:26 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:

Are we being funny?

It is a simple, straight forward question. I want you
to tell me exactly how you believe the moon landings
were faked.

You seem completely unable to do this and thus you have
no case.



They/Apollo simply faked anything and everything having to do with the
moon's surface, and of those essentially naked EVAs is just the best
ever hoax icing on their moon landing cake.

That is start. Let me help you a bit as you do not
seem to be able to answer a simple question on your own.

Who exactly are 'They/Apollo'?

What did they do?

Martin Hogbin

Are you talking about something like the 9.8 m/s of moon dust falling?

Unless you can't count frames per second, where's the big ass mystery
in that?
.. - Brad Guth

On May 7, 1:27 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
On May 6, 10:36 am, Martin Hogbin wrote:
Martin Hogbin wrote:
wrote:
Compare the the below authentic pictures of the Lunar surface with the
fake ones from the Apollo hoax.
Tell me this then. What _exactly_ did happen?
It is telling that no one has answered this simple
question. If the mood landings were faked, how exactly
did they do it. This is the question the moon landing
conspiracy crackpots cannot answer.

Martin Hogbin

Finding one fault with the NASA/Apollo holy grail is all it takes.
We've found dozens of faults. Your being in denial of being in denial
isn't helping, is it.

I cannot be in denial - you have not given me anything
to deny.

Martin Hogbin

Denial of your denial is where you start to appreciate the greater
truth and consequences of your actions.
.. - Brad Guth

Eric Gisse wrote:

The purpose of your reply eludes me.

Try asking him the question that none of the moon
landing conspiracy crackpots can answer; what exactly
do you claim really happened and who was in on it?

All I got was a few grunts in reply.

Martin Hogbin

On May 7, 4:14 pm, Martin Hogbin wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:

The purpose of your reply eludes me.

Try asking him the question that none of the moon
landing conspiracy crackpots can answer; what exactly
do you claim really happened and who was in on it?

All I got was a few grunts in reply.

Martin Hogbin

You got a whole lot more than "grunts", my brown-nosed friend.

Sadly, it seems you and others of your kind can not deductively put
two and two together without first checking your NASA/Apollo Qur'an to
see what's scripted.

What brown-nosed part in the NASA/Apollo ruse did you play?
.. - Brad Guth