![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: anthropic, god, principle, relativistic |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#61
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Hammond wrote:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:41:52 +0000 (UTC), (Michael Moroney) wrote: George Hammond wrote: 13-2nd order factors = 13 Olympian gods of the Greco-Roman Pantheon Which god crashed the Dodekatheon? [Hammond] Modern Science (HAMMOND, 2003) has discovered the origin of the ancient Greek DODEKATHEON (The 12 Olympian gods). Hammond discovered this when he noticed that there are 13 second order Factors (eigenvectors) in EVERY large Psychometric correlation matrix. These are typically 100x100 symmetric Pearson correlation matrices, and are diagonalized using large computers and the eigenvectors automatically extracted. Hammond discovered that sure enough, when you take the arccosine of the Pearson intercorrelation coefficients between the 13 eigenvectors, one finds that the exactly reproduce the mutual angles between the 13 COMMON symmetry axes of a CUBE...!! (Hammond, peer published 1994): ===================================== Hammond G.E (1994) The Cartesian Theory, in New Ideas In Psychology, Vol 12(2) 153-167 Pergamon Press. Online copy of peer/published paper is posted at: http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god/cart.html ===================================== Hence, Hammond has proven that the legendary Greek DODEKATHEON is a CUBE...! (Incidentally, this scientific discovery leads directly to the world's first scientific proof of God, Hammond 2003) Incidentally, the Greek Dodekatheon descended from the Egyptian Dodekatheon and the Greek Dodekatheon was subsequently adopted by the Romans and the names changed. Same CUBIC STRUCTURE of Religion in all 3 ancient classical civilizations.... today this discovery by Hammond, is known as the discovery of the Structural Model of Personality, which has been the object of research ever since Hippocrates the Father of Medicine said there was such a thing 2,500 years ago. Hammond is of course, is still waiting for his Nobel Prize and currently languishing on Welfare arguing with kooks on Usenet about the scientific proof of God while physicists, psychologists and theologians continue to twiddle their thumbs. No they looked at the proof, had a good laugh and went back to doing useful science, not the babble you are producing. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
| Ads |
|
#62
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:13:31 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote: [John Ratsmith] That's only YOUR mentally corrupt and insane delusion! Just the same toilet crap you've always bellowed .. nothing more! Of course not - it's based on your own insane, psychotic delusions. Certainly not by you ............ **** for brains. [Hammond] Screw jackass; you had your chance, you have nothing to say. I'm not replying you any further. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
|
#63
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Hammond writes:
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:06:21 +0000 (UTC), (Michael Moroney) wrote: Modern Science (HAMMOND, 2003) has discovered the origin of the ancient Greek DODEKATHEON (The 12 Olympian gods). You can't very well claim that the number 13 is somehow special to religions because the Greeks had 12 gods in their dodekatheon, now can you? The membership varied but the membership was always limited to 12. Look at the word itself - DODEKAtheon! The Egyptian pantheon had approximetely a dozen demigods. About 60, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_pantheon. The Roman Pantheon had approximately a dozen demigods and Easily several dozen. the Greek Pantheon had approximately a dozen demigods, and Easily several dozen. Thousands when you count individuals described as part of a group. The Titans Oceanus and Tethys had 3,000 sons and 3,000 daughers alone (the Oceanids). I'll let you count them all up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_...the_Greek_gods the REASON for this is that there are PRECISELY 13 SYMMETRY AXES IN A CUBE. We won't discuss which orifice you pulled that statement from. SCIENTIFICALLY, Wrong. there are exactly 13 "demigods" in Religion. So far you haven't come up with *any* religion with exactly (or even about) 13 demigods. The ancient GREEKS were actually one god short. 7% accuracy was good enough in their day.... modern science requires greater accuracy, so 13 is the correct number of demigods. Do you really make this up as you go along? I hate to break the news to you, but the ancient Greeks were good in math. They were able to count to 12 and to 13, and they counted exactly 12 (not 13) gods in their Dodekatheon. You're right in that modern science requires greater accuracy, so you have to find a religion with exactly 13 demigods (not 12, and not 14) if you even wish to have a chance of a dry ice snowball's chance in hell. You better also find some religion with 30 demigods (not 29, not 31). Not that the count of gods is any form of science, but we'll let you pretend it is. |
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Hammond" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:13:31 GMT, "John Smith" wrote: [John Ratsmith] That's only YOUR mentally corrupt and insane delusion! Just the same toilet crap you've always bellowed .. nothing more! Of course not - it's based on your own insane, psychotic delusions. Certainly not by you ............ **** for brains. [Hammond] Screw jackass; you had your chance, you have nothing to say. I'm not replying you any further. Heard THAT crap lie before too!. Have you EVER said anything that wasn't eityher insane, or a lie - or both? |
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:09:01 +0100, "Andy F."
wrote: [Andy F.] There's a human opinion based on sensory perception that the universe has been around for billions of years. [Hammond] There is overwhelming evidence based on scientific deduction that *IF* a person existed a billion years ago, then he would have indeed observed the Universe to exist. I throughly agree with that and anybody who doesn't is certifiably either crazy or incompetent. [Andy F.] This means the universe existed before humans did. [Hammond] WRONG, DEAD WRONG ANDY. 1) The "existence", of anything, depends entirely on the sensory perception of Man. There IS NO definition of the word "existence" that is independent of the action of a HUMAN observer. Proof: If all men died tomorrow at 9am, there would no longer be any way to ascertain at 9:01am if ANYTHING whatsoever "existed". The word "existence" has no meaning whatsoever without the existence of human beings. 2) But what your statement above says, is that circumstantial evidence indicates (indeed conclusively) that *IF* a human observer existed a billion years ago, then he "would have" observed that the Universe "existed". And I thoroughly agree with that statement. 3) However, in point of fact, no such human observer did exist a billion years ago, therefore, by paragraph 1 above, the Universe actually did *NOT* "exist" a billion years ago.... even though it "would have" if anybody was around to see it. [Andy F.] So it's not possible for humans to have created the universe. [Hammond] Wrong again. The above proof demonstrates conclusively that Man "caused" the Universe to come into "existence" since ONLY A HUMAN can confirm that anything "exists". In short, "existence" is a PROPERTY of the human mind. No people, no existence, of anything! ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
|
#66
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:30:16 -0700, none ""doug\"@(none)"
wrote: No they looked at the proof, had a good laugh and went back to doing useful science, not the babble you are producing. [Hammond] Nobody's laughing except wimps like you who've gone cutsie on me. ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
|
#68
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Hammond" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:09:01 +0100, "Andy F." wrote: [Andy F.] There's a human opinion based on sensory perception that the universe has been around for billions of years. [Hammond] There is overwhelming evidence based on scientific deduction that *IF* a person existed a billion years ago, then he would have indeed observed the Universe to exist. I throughly agree with that and anybody who doesn't is certifiably either crazy or incompetent. [Andy F.] This means the universe existed before humans did. [Hammond] WRONG, DEAD WRONG ANDY. 1) The "existence", of anything, depends entirely on the sensory perception of Man. There IS NO definition of the word "existence" that is independent of the action of a HUMAN observer. Proof: If all men died tomorrow at 9am, there would no longer be any way to ascertain at 9:01am if ANYTHING whatsoever "existed". The word "existence" has no meaning whatsoever without the existence of human beings. 2) But what your statement above says, is that circumstantial evidence indicates (indeed conclusively) that *IF* a human observer existed a billion years ago, then he "would have" observed that the Universe "existed". And I thoroughly agree with that statement. An event has to happen BEFORE it can be observed.The light from an object has to travel to your eyes before you can see it. If the object is close by, this takes a few billionths of a second.When you look at the sun, you're seeing what was there 8 minutes ago.And if you look through a powerful telescope, you can observe events which hapened millions of years ago. 3) However, in point of fact, no such human observer did exist a billion years ago, therefore, by paragraph 1 above, the Universe actually did *NOT* "exist" a billion years ago.... even though it "would have" if anybody was around to see it. [Andy F.] So it's not possible for humans to have created the universe. [Hammond] Wrong again. The above proof demonstrates conclusively that Man "caused" the Universe to come into "existence" since ONLY A HUMAN can confirm that anything "exists". In short, "existence" is a PROPERTY of the human mind. No people, no existence, of anything! But a human can't confirm that something exists until after it exists.Which would make it logically impossible for anything to come into existence. |
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
|
George Hammond writes:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 02:46:13 +0000 (UTC), (Michael Moroney) wrote: George Hammond writes: The Egyptian pantheon had approximetely a dozen demigods. About 60, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptian_pantheon. Na.... the 12 "canonical gods" (personality types) were graphically depicted as men with the heads of various animals: You _did_ say a dozen _demigods_, a term which technically excludes the full-blown gods and godesses. But if you get to pick and choose which are on and not on your list, it's hard to argue with that. It is rather interesting that despite making it up as you go along, you choose 12 and not 13, thus disproving yourself. The Roman Pantheon had approximately a dozen demigods and Easily several dozen. Na....the 12 "canonical Roman gods" a Again, you did state demigod, not god, and you chose 12 and not 13. the Greek Pantheon had approximately a dozen demigods, and Easily several dozen. Na....the 12 "canonical Greek gods" a Once again, you did state demigod, not god, and you chose 12 and not 13 by chosing one grouping of the Dodeketheon. We're not interested in "small fry" gods made up by Joe Blow some local artist. So why did you specify 'demigod'? Besides, all those gods were as much a part of the Greek religion as Apollo. the REASON for this is that there are PRECISELY 13 SYMMETRY AXES IN A CUBE. Except three times in a row, you come up with 12 and not 13 gods. Or do you redefine the word "twelve" to mean "thirteen", just like you redefine the word "exist" to try to prove your point? The ancient GREEKS were actually one god short. 7% accuracy was good enough in their day.... modern science requires greater accuracy, so 13 is the correct number of demigods. No answer to the rest of my post? Does that mean you realize I am correct and just want to argue who should/shouldn't be on the list of demigods? No list of religions with 30 demigods? Won't share your scientific sounding gibberish generation technique with us? |
|
#70
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 23, 1:46*pm, "Andy F." wrote:
An event has to happen BEFORE it can be observed.The light from an object has to travel to your eyes before you can see it. If the object is close by, this takes a few billionths of a second.When you look at the sun, you're seeing what was there 8 minutes ago.And if you look through a powerful telescope, you can observe events which hapened millions of years ago. Ouch! waiting in anticipation for GH to respond to that. The universe around us is created by human perception. I agree with this in the sense that humans "conjure" the universe out of a chaotic background of overlapping interference patterns and through the act of observation, give form and solidity to this reality, but why do we create a history that according to GH does not exist. This is a bit like the preacher who, when confronted by evidence of dinosaur bones, claims that god put them there, already pre-aged at several hundred millions of years old. Start thinking GH |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anthropic principle | abracad | Physics - General Discussion | 26 | May 11th 04 07:39 PM |
| A New Anthropic Principle | Radi Khrapko | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 42 | January 16th 04 05:46 PM |
| Anthropic principle | Lubos Motl | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 13 | October 25th 03 03:19 PM |
| Anthropic principle | Bill Jefferys | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 2 | October 25th 03 01:34 AM |
| Anthropic Principle | Jeffery | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 2 | October 9th 03 05:53 AM |