![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: belong, does, geometry, time |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time
curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? Mitch Raemsch |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 13, 3:04 pm, "Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
wrote: Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? That depends on whether its a hook or a slice. Do you mean it depends on SPIN ??? Ken -- Paul Hovnanian ------------------------------------------------------------------ I love guns. Its bullets that I can't stand. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 13, 5:29*pm, wrote:
Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? Mitch Raemsch Curved dimensions? That's pretty twisted. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 13, 5:29 pm, wrote:
Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? Mitch Raemsch Is this a red shift support theory? What about blue shift? That happens too sometimes. The title of your thread is attractive. I agree in a strange way with you. Polysign numbers indicate that beneath the real (two-signed) numbers lay a one-signed (P1) domain which purveys the unidirectional nature of time yet P1 is zero dimensional by definition. Hence consistency with the concept of 'now' and our inability to shift away from the present. So in terms of spacetime geometry we can cast doubt on a 4D representation since the ordinary freedom allowed by three dimensional space does not extend to the time component. The 4D tensor theory may be a representation of nature but it is complicated by its reliance on lightcones which send us back to 3D space. How are one-signed numbers zero dimensional? You can find a detailed answer at http://BandTechnology.com/PolySigned but briefly if one were to attempt to generalize sign it would eventually become apparent that the symmetry by which one would extend the real numbers is via the real behavior - 1 + 1 = 0 which for a three-signed (P3) system would yield - 1 + 1 * 1 = 0 (* is a new sign symbol) which is a two-dimensional system; a general P3 value such as - a + b * c does not generally reduce to a single component; it reduces to two components. Yet this generalized behavior on P1 extends down as - 1 = 0 or - a = 0 where a is any magnitude. This behavior is a step of reduction or rendering or graphing. Beyond that its usage in performing algebra is optional. Hence P1 will still perform algebra such as - 2 ( - 3 - 4 ) = - 14 all the while being zero dimensional. For instance in P2 we can skip the procedure - 1 + 1 = 0 and do summation and multiplication such as ( - 2 + 3 ) ( - 1 + 4 ) = + 2 - 8 - 3 + 12 = - 11 + 14 . While reduction has not been performed that does not make this answer incorrect. Upon graphing such a value in any sign domain its equivalence with the reduced value is immediately apparent. It happens that the two-signed numbers reduce to a single component which is burned into our minds as fundamental. This topic challenges fundamental mathematics yet builds arithmetic support for spacetime. Several other gains are apparent. Following the pure math challenges the presumption of isotropic space. The very definition of 'isotropic' looks quite weak. Certainly space is not the same in all directions. One way I might see a tree and even beyond the tree is a galaxy. Another way I see a wall. Is this space the same in all directions? No. In astronomical circles they concede that they must average the space to make it isotropic which is farcical. - Tim |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 14, 7:15*am, "Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com"
wrote: On Apr 13, 5:29 pm, wrote: Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? Mitch Raemsch Is this a red shift support theory? What about blue shift? That happens too sometimes. Entering time slowdown blueshifts light. Mitch Reamsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 14, 2:30*pm, wrote:
On Apr 14, 7:15*am, "Timothy Golden * BandTechnology.com" wrote: On Apr 13, 5:29 pm, wrote: Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? Mitch Raemsch Is this a red shift support theory? What about blue shift? That happens too sometimes. Entering time slowdown blueshifts light. Mitch Reamsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 There is motion curvature enhanced by slow. The slowdown of time effects motion curvature in the advance of the perihilion of Mercury also called its pause. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 15 Apr, 02:30, wrote:
On Apr 14, 2:30*pm, wrote: On Apr 14, 7:15*am, "Timothy Golden * BandTechnology.com" wrote: On Apr 13, 5:29 pm, wrote: Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature.. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? Mitch Raemsch Is this a red shift support theory? What about blue shift? That happens too sometimes. Entering time slowdown blueshifts light. Mitch Reamsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 There is motion curvature enhanced by slow. The slowdown of time effects motion curvature in the advance of the perihilion of Mercury also called its pause. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 Time is not just an intimate of geometry: it is a product of geometry, at least as something that can be measured! When did clocks begin to strike the quarter hours in Europe? Why? -- 'foolsrushin.' |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 15, 1:50*am, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 15 Apr, 02:30, wrote: On Apr 14, 2:30*pm, wrote: On Apr 14, 7:15*am, "Timothy Golden * BandTechnology.com" wrote: On Apr 13, 5:29 pm, wrote: Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? Mitch Raemsch Is this a red shift support theory? What about blue shift? That happens too sometimes. Entering time slowdown blueshifts light. Mitch Reamsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 There is motion curvature enhanced by slow. The slowdown of time effects motion curvature in the advance of the perihilion of Mercury also called its pause. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 Time is not just an intimate of geometry: it is a product of geometry, at least as something that can be measured! When did clocks begin to strike the quarter hours in Europe? In the Middle Ages. Why? Because Europeans are castle idiots, and uniformed about the wonders of GPS, Sattelites, Cruise Missiles, micro-computers lasers, and robots that go "rick-rock", instead of "tick-tock". -- 'foolsrushin.'- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Apr 14, 9:50*pm, "foolsrushin." wrote:
On 15 Apr, 02:30, wrote: On Apr 14, 2:30*pm, wrote: On Apr 14, 7:15*am, "Timothy Golden * BandTechnology.com" wrote: On Apr 13, 5:29 pm, wrote: Time simply slows. That is its one property. There is no time curvature there is only space. Gravity creates directions in space through curvature. If time were a curved dimension what direction would it curve in? Mitch Raemsch Is this a red shift support theory? What about blue shift? That happens too sometimes. Entering time slowdown blueshifts light. Mitch Reamsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 There is motion curvature enhanced by slow. The slowdown of time effects motion curvature in the advance of the perihilion of Mercury also called its pause. Mitch Raemsch Twice Nobel Laureate 2008 Time is not just an intimate of geometry: it is a product of geometry, Time fills space. at least as something that can be measured! When did clocks begin to strike the quarter hours in Europe? Why? -- 'foolsrushin.'- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Time doesn't belong to geometry | BURT | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 64 | January 3rd 08 09:44 AM |
| Time doesn't belong to geometry | BURT | Physics - General Discussion | 55 | January 1st 08 10:58 PM |
| Time doesn't belong to geometry | BURT | The Theory of Relativity | 55 | January 1st 08 10:58 PM |
| JSH All Your Base Belong To Me. All Your Ass Belong To Me Too. | huangxienchen@yahoo.com | Physics - General Discussion | 4 | January 12th 07 03:47 AM |
| Lobachevsky geometry + Riemann geometry = Euclid geometry; picture model | a_plutonium@hotmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | February 7th 06 06:41 PM |