![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: sos, yablon |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Professor Yablon,
I am Mr. George Hammond. I feel more comfortable addressing you as professor Yablon if you don't mind. . I am an M.S. in Physics and can barely read your papers. However I was alerted by your statement: We don't observe free magnetic monopoles because they are quarks and we don’t observe free quarks either. There is no need to explain this as I don't know enough Physics to discuss it but obviously it has intriguing face validity. Rather, I am an expert on genius itself, being a "psychological physicist", and your statement identifies you as a genius. To get to my point, the goal of "psychological physics" is to explain God, and I claim to have achieved success. I tried professor Chris Isham (Theoretical Physics Group and Dean of Science, Imperial College, London) but all he did was whine about his 95 year old mother dying in a nursing home, complain bitterly about his workload and perfunctorily repeat a litany of "So you have not proved God" over and over again. Judging from your publications and your photograph I have every confidence that you could, and would, squash like a bug any sort of scientific tomfoolery, incompetence or nonsense and could easily assess my elementary physics discovery in 5 MINUTES FLAT ! I presume that you have no interest in the subject of "God" per se, and neither do I, actually. However, there are certain scientific discoveries that are vital to us all, and this happens to be one of them. I have no intention of cluttering your discussion group with this, but I was hoping that you would, as a public service gesture, make a quick off the cuff scientific assessment of it. What I have discovered is that the Factor Analytic structure of Psychometrics is CAUSALLY identical to the tensor (4x4 matrix) structure of Linearized Gravity in Relativity. In short, that the phenomenon of "God" so called, is simply a curvature of subjective spacetime wch. obeys the Einstein Field Equations (EFE). In practical terms this means that we see a "curved version" of objective reality, and that the degree of curvature varies from person to person. The entire world looks BIGGER and FASTER than it really is- to all of us, and this is the scientific explanation of the phenomenon of God. Finally, the source term in the EFE describing this phenomenon is the well known Secular Trend in human growth... it is a simple percent "brain growth" that causes the curvature, and hence causes the classical God of the Bible. In short, it is a proof that there a God, and that God can be, and has been, measured to 3 significant figures! OK, that's it, and as you can see this "proof of God" entails nothing more than undergraduate level General Relativity and Linear Algebra.... certainly trivial to a Relativity physicist like yourself. But, as you know, towing the barge of religion into the modern scientific age is of vast importance socially, and I am hopeful that someone like you could spare a FEW MINUTES of your time to pro bono assist with the care and management of the huddled masses of our society. Sincerely yours, George Hammond, M.S. Physics ===================================== SCIENTIFIC PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god mirror site: http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com GOD=G_uv (a folk song on mp3) http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3 ===================================== |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"George Hammond" wrote in message ... GEORGE!!!!!!!!!! Spend a few weeks in "the ward" again!?!?!?! Dear Professor Yablon, I am Mr. George Hammond. I feel more comfortable addressing you as professor Yablon if you don't mind. . I am an M.S. in Physics and can barely read your papers. However I was alerted by your statement: We don't observe free magnetic monopoles because they are quarks and we don't observe free quarks either. There is no need to explain this as I don't know enough Physics to discuss it but obviously it has intriguing face validity. Rather, I am an expert on genius itself, being a "psychological physicist", and your statement identifies you as a genius. What are the CVs you have to show your education and expertise in these INVENTED "fields"? You are barely an expert in taking a **** without help. You certainly know nothing about "genius". To get to my point, the goal of "psychological physics" is to explain God, and I claim to have achieved success. Psychological physics is NOT an education course ......... it's just a meaningless phrase you invented, then bellowed. I tried professor Chris Isham (Theoretical Physics Group and Dean of Science, Imperial College, London) but all he did was whine about his 95 year old mother dying in a nursing home, complain bitterly about his workload and perfunctorily repeat a litany of "So you have not proved God" over and over again. Ahhh..... a few personal smears, and then minimizing the fact that Isham flushed your crap - just like everyone else has. Judging from your publications and your photograph I have every confidence that you could, and would, squash like a bug any sort of scientific tomfoolery, incompetence or nonsense and could easily assess my elementary physics discovery in 5 MINUTES FLAT ! And flush it as meaningless crap ... in ONE! I presume that you have no interest in the subject of "God" per se, and neither do I, actually. Bwahahaaaaaaa....... However, there are certain scientific discoveries that are vital to us all, and this happens to be one of them. I have no intention of cluttering your discussion group with this, but I was hoping that you would, as a public service gesture, make a quick off the cuff scientific assessment of it. That's all you've EVER done; clutter up discussion groups with your CRAP! What I have discovered is that the Factor Analytic structure of Psychometrics is CAUSALLY identical to the tensor (4x4 matrix) structure of Linearized Gravity in Relativity. In short, that the phenomenon of "God" so called, is simply a curvature of subjective spacetime wch. obeys the Einstein Field Equations (EFE). In practical terms this means that we see a "curved version" of objective reality, and that the degree of curvature varies from person to person. The entire world looks BIGGER and FASTER than it really is- to all of us, and this is the scientific explanation of the phenomenon of God. Finally, the source term in the EFE describing this phenomenon is the well known Secular Trend in human growth... it is a simple percent "brain growth" that causes the curvature, and hence causes the classical God of the Bible. In short, it is a proof that there a God, and that God can be, and has been, measured to 3 significant figures! OK, that's it, and as you can see this "proof of God" entails nothing more than undergraduate level General Relativity and Linear Algebra.... certainly trivial to a Relativity physicist like yourself. But, as you know, towing the barge of religion into the modern scientific age is of vast importance socially, and I am hopeful that someone like you could spare a FEW MINUTES of your time to pro bono assist with the care and management of the huddled masses of our society. Sincerely yours, George Hammond, M.S. Physics You will be a good boy, for a change, and honestly tell us when he shoves you back into your psycho-hole. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Paper on Magnetic Monopoles by J.Yablon! | andy | Particle Physics | 0 | September 6th 05 11:32 AM |
| Yablon Doff and Nattale | Al.Rivero@gmail.com | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 6 | August 20th 05 12:09 PM |
| Yablon and De Vries. | Alejandro | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 4 | March 7th 05 09:47 PM |