Perpetual motion (such as many experiments through the use magnets)
cannot generate energy without loss of perpetual motion.

Chemistry certifies that energy is ALWAYS conserved, before and after
the reaction.

If perpetual motion gerenated energy without any loss of motion
(friction, etc...) then the laws of energy conservation would be
abolished.

Meaning new energy would be created, as well as the creation of matter
since energy can be converted into matter and vice versa.

For this reason: It is Impossible.

In brief, it would be the same as the big bang, Godly creating
substance/energy from nothing = impossible.

On Feb 9, 2:39*am, " wrote:
Perpetual motion (such as many experiments through the use magnets)
cannot generate energy without loss of perpetual motion.

Chemistry certifies that energy is ALWAYS conserved, before and after
the reaction.

If perpetual motion gerenated energy without any loss of motion
(friction, etc...) then the laws of energy conservation would be
abolished.

Meaning new energy would be created, as well as the creation of matter
since energy can be converted into matter and vice versa.

For this reason: It is Impossible.

On Feb 9, 3:39*am, " wrote:
Perpetual motion (such as many experiments through the use magnets)
cannot generate energy without loss of perpetual motion.

Chemistry certifies that energy is ALWAYS conserved, before and after
the reaction.

But the only the reason the pertputal motion of magnets
even exist is because physicists are morons.
And wouldn't know the differerence between motion,
conservation, and energy if a moron chemist
told them:
"Energy Always happens around here".



If perpetual motion gerenated energy without any loss of motion
(friction, etc...) then the laws of energy conservation would be
abolished.

Meaning new energy would be created, as well as the creation of matter
since energy can be converted into matter and vice versa.

For this reason: It is Impossible.

" wrote:

Perpetual motion (such as many experiments through the use magnets)
cannot generate energy without loss of perpetual motion.

Chemistry certifies that energy is ALWAYS conserved, before and after
the reaction.
[snip]

Energy is not conserved, nor is there any reason for energy to be
conserved.

1) Time is homogeneous
2) Noether's theorem
3) Mass-energy is locally conserved.

Go away.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

On Feb 9, 2:28*pm, "
wrote:
On Feb 9, 1:53*pm, Igor wrote:





On Feb 9, 3:39*am, " wrote:

Perpetual motion (such as many experiments through the use magnets)
cannot generate energy without loss of perpetual motion.

Chemistry certifies that energy is ALWAYS conserved, before and after
the reaction.

If perpetual motion gerenated energy without any loss of motion
(friction, etc...) then the laws of energy conservation would be
abolished.

Meaning new energy would be created, as well as the creation of matter
since energy can be converted into matter and vice versa.

For this reason: It is Impossible.

Well, you've got the first law down. *Now, maybe it's time to move on
to the second one.

* *That's impossible with the idiots who own the 2nd Law of
Thermodynamics.
* *Which is mostly why CD, Laser Pointers, Laser Printers, Turing
Machines,
* *Mathcad, Internet, Robots, Solar Energy, and PV Cells were
developed for the idiots.

How many of them do you own anyway?

On Feb 9, 3:01*pm, " wrote:
On Feb 9, 9:39 am, " wrote:

Perpetual motion (such as many experiments through the use magnets)
cannot generate energy without loss of perpetual motion.

Chemistry certifies that energy is ALWAYS conserved, before and after
the reaction.

If perpetual motion gerenated energy without any loss of motion
(friction, etc...) then the laws of energy conservation would be
abolished.

Meaning new energy would be created, as well as the creation of matter
since energy can be converted into matter and vice versa.

For this reason: It is Impossible.

No, the truth is that you are teh absolute-moron.

Pot. Kettle.

On Feb 9, 1:27*pm, Uncle Al wrote:
" wrote:

Perpetual motion (such as many experiments through the use magnets)
cannot generate energy without loss of perpetual motion.

Chemistry certifies that energy is ALWAYS conserved, before and after
the reaction.

[snip]

Energy is not conserved, nor is there any reason for energy to be
conserved.

* *1) Time is homogeneous
* *2) Noether's theorem
* *3) Mass-energy is locally conserved.


Correct and perfect. And of an intelligence above intelligence.

Go away.

--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
*(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

On Apr 2, 3:05 pm, guskz wrote:

Correct and perfect. And of an intelligence above intelligence.


http://www.desktoprating.com/wallpap...-wallpaper.htm