![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
| Tags: cosmic, deep, dstrings, epoch, filaments, gamma, hard, inflation, macroscopic, meshquot, network, quotmurray, radiation, redshifted, sky, visible |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rich Murray wrote in message
... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/7 visible cosmic network of deep sky filaments ("Murray mesh") as redshifted hard gamma radiation from macroscopic cosmic F- and D-strings from epoch just after inflation (Copeland, Myers, Polchinski 2004.05.25): Murray 2004.06.19 rmforall Rich Murray, MA Room For All 1943 Otowi Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 USA 505-501-2298 2004 June 19 On August 30 2001, I became intrigued with easily visible, equally easily dismissable networks of faint, thin, crooked, connected, continuous threads, discernable with patient scrutiny of almost all deep sky images at visible and infrared ranges. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/1 http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group....dir=/&.view=t deep sky background filaments: images and interpretation: Murray 2002.01.19 rmforall Click on the thumbnail photos to get the photos, and click on those in turn to get full screen photos. Artifacts? Or?-- immense filaments of H, He, and dark matter, lit by intense UV from the earliest very massive stars, "...during the first 10E8 years of the history of the universe at redshifts between 50 and 10...," Prof. Richard B. Larson, Sci. Am. Dec 2001, and http://www.astro.yale.edu/larson/papers/Noordwijk99.pdf [7 pages]. This very early intense UV is now redshifted into the visible and IR bands, and may supply about half of the current cosmic IR background. The filaments are generally as thin as 1 pixel. {snip} Keep in mind that all Hubble images are computer-processed and enhanced. This is part of the 'fix' required due to the spherical aberration of the main mirror. You may be seeing simple pixel artifacts. Or, you may be 'seeing' patterns that aren't there (like Percival's Martian canals). At any rate, I can't seem to see any such objects. But then, I may not have been patient enough. -- greywolf42 ubi dubium ibi libertas {remove planet for return e-mail} |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/8
specific guide for seeing Murray mesh in a 1.89 MB Hubble photo of Abell 1689: Murray 2004.06.19 rmforall Rich Murray, MA Room For All 1943 Otowi Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 USA 505-501-2298 2004 June 19 Thanks, greywolf24 for your civil, reasoned comments. To zero in on seeing what I am talking about, jump to the link below to image/f , a 1.89 MB Tiff image of a recent Hubble photo of Abell 1689. http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/new...003/01/image/f Note the foreground galaxy at the upper left corner, which has a bright center, about 1 cm wide. Shift your attention 2 cm to the right from the right edge of the white center. Relaxed scrutiny will reveal a mesh of minute crooked reddish filaments against a fuzzy, light yellow-green background. After a few minutes, having trained yourself to notice these delicate textures, shift your attention 1 cm further to the right. You probably will notice that the reddish filaments become gradually blacker and several times thicker. After a few minutes, try slowly focussing further to the right, 1 cm at a time. You probably will notice that the black filaments are everywhere in the background, when not overridden by very bright forground objects. A number of middle-ground galaxies are stretched out into thin arcs by gravitational lensing. I see no signs that the background Murray mesh is affected. I conclude that the evidence indicates the presence of an actual 3D mesh, far behind even the tiniest galaxies. I am not sure if the background further behind the mesh is fuzzy green, or is itself a continuation of the reddish and black Murray mesh into a more distant green mesh. I am very glad to get civil serious or playful feedback from various points of view. Can anyone help me find a purely random dot image, about 1 MB, with roughly equal amounts of pixels for black, white, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, violet, so we can all explore what kind of artifacts may be seen? In mutual service, Rich ************************************************** ************** http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/6 background filament networks (Murray mesh) in deep sky photos-- noise artifacts or early cosmic structure? Boehringer: Murray 2004.06.15 rmforall Try it with selections from the recent Hubble photo of Abell 1689 at http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/new...2003/01/image/ http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/new...003/01/image/f This 1.89 MB TIFF image at 1X or 2X clearly show myriad red and black filaments in what I intrepret as a deep 3D mesh, which can been seen behind as well as between the translucent foreground galaxies. I haven't seen any signs of gravitational lensing, which might be because they are too far behind the lensing cluster to be "in focus". ************************************************** ************** newsgroup: sci.physics greywolf42 wrote in message ... Rich Murray wrote in message ... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/7 visible cosmic network of deep sky filaments ("Murray mesh") as redshifted hard gamma radiation from macroscopic cosmic F- and D-strings from epoch just after inflation (Copeland, Myers, Polchinski 2004.05.25): Murray 2004.06.19 rmforall Rich Murray, MA Room For All 1943 Otowi Road, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 USA 505-501-2298 2004 June 19 On August 30 2001, I became intrigued with easily visible, equally easily dismissable networks of faint, thin, crooked, connected, continuous threads, discernable with patient scrutiny of almost all deep sky images at visible and infrared ranges. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AstroDeep/1 http://photos.groups.yahoo.com/group....dir=/&.view=t deep sky background filaments: images and interpretation: Murray 2002.01.19 rmforall Click on the thumbnail photos to get the photos, and click on those in turn to get full screen photos. Artifacts? Or?-- immense filaments of H, He, and dark matter, lit by intense UV from the earliest very massive stars, "...during the first 10E8 years of the history of the universe at redshifts between 50 and 10...," Prof. Richard B. Larson, Sci. Am. Dec 2001, and http://www.astro.yale.edu/larson/papers/Noordwijk99.pdf [7 pages]. This very early intense UV is now redshifted into the visible and IR bands, and may supply about half of the current cosmic IR background. The filaments are generally as thin as 1 pixel. {snip} Keep in mind that all Hubble images are computer-processed and enhanced. This is part of the 'fix' required due to the spherical aberration of the main mirror. You may be seeing simple pixel artifacts. Or, you may be 'seeing' patterns that aren't there (like Percival's Martian canals). At any rate, I can't seem to see any such objects. But then, I may not have been patient enough. -- greywolf42 ubi dubium ibi libertas {remove planet for return e-mail} ************************************************** *************** |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| background filament networks (Murray mesh) in deep sky photos-- noise artifacts or early cosmic structure? Boehringer: Murray 2004.06.15 rmforall | Rich Murray | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | June 16th 04 04:46 AM |
| Gold and Dyson on "The Deep Hot Biosphe The Myth of Fossil Fuels" | Heimdall | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | May 31st 04 11:53 AM |
| Gold and Dyson on "The Deep Hot Biosphere : The Myth of Fossil Fuels" | W. Watson | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | May 30th 04 09:10 PM |
| Cosmic Background Radiation (from sci.astro.research) | greywolf42 | Physics - General Discussion | 5 | February 24th 04 02:40 PM |