Neil Armstrong exposes Apollo Hoax

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 24, 9:57 pm, Jeremy Guerdon
wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:52:58 +0000, Jon Slaughter wrote:
"Bruce Scott TOK" ] wrote in
...
Schoenfeld wrote:

Take a look at this video of the Apollo II conference

I dunno about that video appearance, but recently I saw an interesting
film clip on one of the internet video sites.

In the clip I saw, the astronaut was dismounting the LEM and he made a
statement something like "one small step for man...". When the astronaut
stepped off the ladder, a studio light fell off its mount hit the ground
a
few feet from the LEM. The director stopped the action and the video crew
was scrambling to re-assemble the scene.

Anyone else seen *that* clip?

Oh sure they rehearsed everything they were supposed to do on the
moon,
they even got Stanley Kubric to do some mock-ups so they would know
what
to expect when they got there.

You see, where you are out there, you know, so far away from home and
all that, you are out there representing America, and the world,
and you want to be sure, that you know what you are doing.

And he planned what he was going to say too, when he stepped off the
LEM,
and they had a camera on a remote arm or something there ready to film
that first step on the moon.

That footprint under the LEM, that wasn't really a footprint at all,
that was a mark,
a small crater, made by the um jet engine.

And sure lots of the footage has been sped up 50% and all that,
like the lunar rover, but again, its all relative.

All right, I give up.

You got us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D81hZ8HcFf0

If this was on the moon, at 1 6th the earths gravity, going over that
bump,
he would have flown through the air.

Speaking of 'air', have you noticed that none of the dust thrown up by the
wheels stayed 'up' in the air - but it fell back down to the surface almost
as if there just wasn't any air there.

Dang!

On Feb 25, 2:11 am, "OG" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...



On Feb 24, 9:57 pm, Jeremy Guerdon
wrote:
On Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:52:58 +0000, Jon Slaughter wrote:
"Bruce Scott TOK" ] wrote in
...
Schoenfeld wrote:

Take a look at this video of the Apollo II conference

I dunno about that video appearance, but recently I saw an interesting
film clip on one of the internet video sites.

In the clip I saw, the astronaut was dismounting the LEM and he made a
statement something like "one small step for man...". When the astronaut
stepped off the ladder, a studio light fell off its mount hit the ground
a
few feet from the LEM. The director stopped the action and the video crew
was scrambling to re-assemble the scene.

Anyone else seen *that* clip?

Oh sure they rehearsed everything they were supposed to do on the
moon,
they even got Stanley Kubric to do some mock-ups so they would know
what
to expect when they got there.

You see, where you are out there, you know, so far away from home and
all that, you are out there representing America, and the world,
and you want to be sure, that you know what you are doing.

And he planned what he was going to say too, when he stepped off the
LEM,
and they had a camera on a remote arm or something there ready to film
that first step on the moon.

That footprint under the LEM, that wasn't really a footprint at all,
that was a mark,
a small crater, made by the um jet engine.

And sure lots of the footage has been sped up 50% and all that,
like the lunar rover, but again, its all relative.

All right, I give up.

You got us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D81hZ8HcFf0

If this was on the moon, at 1 6th the earths gravity, going over that
bump,
he would have flown through the air.

Speaking of 'air', have you noticed that none of the dust thrown up by the
wheels stayed 'up' in the air - but it fell back down to the surface almost
as if there just wasn't any air there.

Dang!

And not only that, but there is no far horizon.

If that was the earth, you would see at least one shot of some sort of
far
horizon, but the moon, is not very far across, only 2,300 miles,
and thats why the horizon always seems like you know just a few
football
fields away.

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Feb 25, 7:35 am, "Me" wrote:
Neil armstrong does not look like that or talk like that and the other
two
men do not resemble those people either.

Sheesh, you apollo hoax -believers get more delusional with time
(squared).



You sure can say that about yourself for sure, but you did not have to tell
us, we already know.


****************************** PLONK**********************************

On Feb 25, 2:02 am, "OG" wrote:
wrote in message

ups.com...

Take a look at this video of the Apollo II conference

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RcKLAo62Ro

Neil Armstrong shows extreme signs of guilt - the same kind criminals
display during interrogations.

I much prefer this one - entitled Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage it
purports to show that the 'low gravity' effects were faked using 'Peter Pan'
stage show type wires.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQ...elated&search=

However, if you look at the images of the Astronaut trying to stand up at
2:14 you can quite clearly see the fall of dust as kicked up by his left
foot. That couldn't have been shot on earth. From a very minor movement of
his foot you can see the dust as it lands - and it reaches a distance of at
least 2 or 3 metres without any air resistance.

It's a very effective demonstration of the difference that an airless
environment like the Moon makes.

If that's THEIR evidence it's clear they don't have a clue.
.

Yes the dust is clearly, rooster tailing all over the place.
This whole business of it should have done this and that,
you can clearly see, when you slow this video down
by one half, that the rooster tails, are feet perhaps
a meter, longer, than they would be at lets say a dirt track in
Nevada.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxdPP7DdieI

On Feb 25, 2:57 am, wrote:
On Feb 25, 2:02 am, "OG" wrote:



wrote in message

oups.com...

Take a look at this video of the Apollo II conference

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RcKLAo62Ro

Neil Armstrong shows extreme signs of guilt - the same kind criminals
display during interrogations.

I much prefer this one - entitled Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage it
purports to show that the 'low gravity' effects were faked using 'Peter Pan'
stage show type wires.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQ...elated&search=

However, if you look at the images of the Astronaut trying to stand up at
2:14 you can quite clearly see the fall of dust as kicked up by his left
foot. That couldn't have been shot on earth. From a very minor movement of
his foot you can see the dust as it lands - and it reaches a distance of at
least 2 or 3 metres without any air resistance.

It's a very effective demonstration of the difference that an airless
environment like the Moon makes.

If that's THEIR evidence it's clear they don't have a clue.
.

Yes the dust is clearly, rooster tailing all over the place.
This whole business of it should have done this and that,
you can clearly see, when you slow this video down
by one half, that the rooster tails, are feet perhaps
a meter, longer, than they would be at lets say a dirt track in
Nevada.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxdPP7DdieI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkiR9P3CrR0
Guilty as charged.

No delay between them and Houston, or a small insignificant one,
hence the 'talk' so as to try to pretend there was one.

You can actually see them, in the capsule change the aperture,
and see the earth outside the window bright as day.

130,000 miles out, well thats impossible, and it couldn't
have been a rehearsal, because they just had the one
rocket, and they were in orbit, and this shows just a few
minutes, of the one hour self condemnation, where they
openly discuss, trying to fool the public, by darkening
the capsule, and using the window, to fake the earth in
the distance.

America never set foot on the moon.

And soon, when other countries go there next year,
the world is going to know.

Most people know that already.

What a disgrace.

Imagine what young people growing up, will think of their country.

On Feb 25, 3:39 am, wrote:
On Feb 25, 2:57 am, wrote:



On Feb 25, 2:02 am, "OG" wrote:

wrote in message

oups.com...

Take a look at this video of the Apollo II conference

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RcKLAo62Ro

Neil Armstrong shows extreme signs of guilt - the same kind criminals
display during interrogations.

I much prefer this one - entitled Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage it
purports to show that the 'low gravity' effects were faked using 'Peter Pan'
stage show type wires.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQ...elated&search=

However, if you look at the images of the Astronaut trying to stand up at
2:14 you can quite clearly see the fall of dust as kicked up by his left
foot. That couldn't have been shot on earth. From a very minor movement of
his foot you can see the dust as it lands - and it reaches a distance of at
least 2 or 3 metres without any air resistance.

It's a very effective demonstration of the difference that an airless
environment like the Moon makes.

If that's THEIR evidence it's clear they don't have a clue.
.

Yes the dust is clearly, rooster tailing all over the place.
This whole business of it should have done this and that,
you can clearly see, when you slow this video down
by one half, that the rooster tails, are feet perhaps
a meter, longer, than they would be at lets say a dirt track in
Nevada.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxdPP7DdieI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkiR9P3CrR0
Guilty as charged.

No delay between them and Houston, or a small insignificant one,
hence the 'talk' so as to try to pretend there was one.

You can actually see them, in the capsule change the aperture,
and see the earth outside the window bright as day.

130,000 miles out, well thats impossible, and it couldn't
have been a rehearsal, because they just had the one
rocket, and they were in orbit, and this shows just a few
minutes, of the one hour self condemnation, where they
openly discuss, trying to fool the public, by darkening
the capsule, and using the window, to fake the earth in
the distance.

America never set foot on the moon.

And soon, when other countries go there next year,
the world is going to know.

Most people know that already.

What a disgrace.

Imagine what young people growing up, will think of their country.

So OK, its pretty clear that America never set foot on the moon.

Anyone who sees these clips, will know that.

And to further, try to pretend, that they did, well that is an option,
because of course the government can tell the people whatever it
wants, and the people will believe them, because they want to
believe their government.

And I could have played Oberg in this debate and with such things
as yes, but time slows down in space, many would have bought into
that.

Keep in mind these videos have been available for 10 years or more.

And why didn't the Russians, and will the Chinese, or will India, say,
hello, there are no footprints, there is no visible landing tracks,
and etc.

Well how much of that could have been done with secret missions,
and robotics well its anyone's guess.

No one seems to be all too clear on the amount of shielding needed
to penetrate the Van Allen belts, and you could always say yes,
but we went up, the northern route, to avoid the belts, and everyone
would believe that.

Except for a few scientists and well they won't say anything because
they fear retribution for saying anything anyways.

But when you look at that footage today, right away, you say fake.
Because we have seen so much in the way of space shows and
special effects that people have a pretty good idea what it looks like
or should look like out there, and to see these goons bouncing around
on such a small set, well, as murky and grainy as the footage is,
it just looks fake.

And really, how sad for these people, who work at NASA.

How sad, to want to be a scientist, and want to be an astronaut,
and to know, that these are just words for con men, and cheats,
and liars, whose real job it is, to steal from the stupid trusting
public.

How sad for them.

Who have to go to work every day, knowing all this.

The rest of us, well we can laugh at them, knowing they are petty
crooks
and thieves, and say well, is it so surprising? To find out that they
were just ripping off the public again?

caveat emptor

And what does it say about people like Carl Sagan, just another
aluminum siding salesman, who could lie like he was a saint.

And everything he ever told anyone, just so much BS.

And even people like Arthur C. Clark. Wasn't he a NASA insider?

Just another circus hawker selling pennies by the pound, looking down
his
nose on the peons, in middle America, who skin their knuckles,
working in the steel mills of this land well he would say they skin
them dragging them on the ground.

Well f*ck you Arthur, and f*ck you Carl.

They are better than you will ever be. The lowliest cleaning maid who
ever
cleaned up your f*ckin slop in your mansion in Sri Lanka, is a better
person that you will ever be, you cheap too bit gang of con artists.

pituee.

I fart in your general direction you lowlife lying cheating pompous
ass.

How dare you.

How dare you do this, to the young people of America.

On Feb 23, 7:19 pm, wrote:

With persuasive "proof" such as this argument, I see no reason not to
assume that the astronaut also shot JFK, concealed "BigFoot", covered
up Roswell, and is cheating on his wife...

You must be a very emotional person. My advise for you is that you
need to think clearly with analytical mind for a change. shrug

On Feb 24, 10:21 am, Bruce Scott TOK wrote:

I find it telling that the same sort of people who indulge nonsense
because they can't deal with things like relativity are the same sort
who push things like 9/11 and moonlanding conspiracies.

I find that the ones who cannot do the math of relativity rely on
someone else to think for them. These poor souls in order not to show
how challenged in learning as they are have to admit that the emperor
has clothes on. In doing so, they can easily be programmed to do
anything the programmer wishes just like a computer. shrug

You're watching someone's facial expression... seeing what you want to
see.

This I do agree.

On Feb 24, 3:42 pm, "Robert S" wrote:
On Feb 24, 6:21 pm, Bruce Scott TOK Use-Author-Supplied-Address-

I find it telling that the same sort of people who indulge nonsense
because they can't deal with things like relativity are the same sort
who push things like 9/11 and moonlanding conspiracies.

And in all those cases it's pointless to argue with them, because they
have attained a faith-based level of illogical stupidity.

So, you embrace anything as faith that the authority wants you to know
even if in doing so the laws of physics would break down in direct
violation of 12 years of free education the government generously
provide you. That is fine. However, you don't have to call others
who can rationalize 'illogical stupidity'.

The west is gradually becoming non religious.

Not only the west. The whole world is. You need to travel more.

Conspiracy theory and
various shades of spirituality are taking up the slack.

There are no such things as conspiracy theories. It is a bully phrase
to smear any argument before the argument starts.

Conservation of idiocy.

Amen. I see a lot of that in SR and GR.

The USSR, having spent billions on their own planned moon landing
attempts,

How do you manage to know the secret of USSR? Do you happen to land
on a de-classified paper or something? If so, pleas share it with us.

decides to go along with giving their bitter rivals all the
glory for having spent a few hours in a TV studio.

I don't think they give a damn about the foolish thing their rivals
are doing. They had their own.

And this man's facial expressions prove it.

Perhaps. We would never know, wouldn't we?

On Feb 24, 3:10 pm, "GeekBoy" wrote:

Actually you should not be able to see the stars. We see them from the Earth
because the atmosphere is making it possible just like at certain times of
the day the sun looks larger than it normally is because of optics of the
atmosphere.

Could you explain how the orbiting Hubble observatory is able to see
into billion and billions of years into the past? After all, it
operates in an airless environment.