![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: motion, perpetual |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Perpetual Motion, is like a rubics cube that has never been solved.
Every single scientist who has approached it, denies it. Every single scientist, that has attempted to solve the problem and produce a system that operates over unity, has labeled it impossible. In spite of how some people seem to believe that the Universe is broken, although, it continues with closed environmental systems deep in caves, ecosystems that require no light, and rely completely on chemosynthesis, they still insist that the Universe, cannot support perpetual motion. Although, it may require billions of years for the moon to finally fall to the Earth, they have all given up on the math. They throw down the puzzle, just like the rubics cube so many recollect having been thrown before. Why don't they run around in a panic and just start screaming "Entropy! We're all gonna die!" There is no reason that a closed loop system cannot work. Every time you see that shrimp in a bottle with a tiny piece of kelp to keep enough oxygen around, it hasn't stopped producing bioelectric impulses or it's thinking by as much it's breathing, nor limited the creature physical strength. It has to be possible, or it wouldn't happen. It is the assumption of the quitters that have given up, or never tried, that will tell you that it's against the laws of thermodynamics. But, far be it from them to know how many BTUs it would require to heat a living room of 30' X 30' X 8', from a temperature of 0 degrees celsius at sea level. Entropy of intellect will kill us all!! |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don't think that I don't know of something that would work until the bearing wore out. First, invent the right compressor pump. It uses two solenoids, with electromagnetic coils that are tuned to a frequency that is 1/5th of the frequency of the stroke of the pump. The pump is designed like a Rod Pump. http://www.autoelect.com/wp/Specs/pr...oc/index.shtml The rest uses hydrodynamics, and slug flow, with a 500 ft deep well. The well has a diameter that is wide enough to prevent air bubbles from being drawn down into it. The maximum line diameter of pipes from the bottom to the top in which slug flow is generated is 4 inches. A water wheel, then collects the energy through a spill way that again seperates the air from the water, and a gearbox. If you use a crappy compressor, you won't be over unity. If you use a water wheel that is either two wide or too narrow, it won't work. If the gear ratio is wrong, the generator won't produce enough power to keep the solenoid running. There is a compressor piston on either side of the fulcrum, the Rod Pump is an example of both the velocity range it should the solenoid should be operated at, and the value of inductance to design the solenoid with. Maximum current flow is present for 4/5ths of the stroke. The solenoid is also designed to insure that the stroke is never greater than 1/3rd the length of the solenoid, and spends all of it's time at least 2/3rds inside the coil that draws it back. The solenoid is also designed never to reach clamp. So, there are alot of terms to understand, that cross over into several fields of study. Fluid/hydrodynamics and slug flow. Electronics, for the control switching of the solenoids, which could be mechanical. Specialty in solenoid design to design the solenoids. The design of waterwheels which has practically all been replaced with turbines, at high pressures, volumes, and flow rates, verses low velocity, moderate volume flow rates. Plenty of old school to prove either this or that. And remember, opinion, doesn't build anything, doesn't prove whether and idea will or won't work. It is only an opinion and should be given only the validity of any cave painting. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote in
ups.com: (much meaningless babble snipped) celsius at sea level. Entropy of intellect will kill us all!! Your intellect appears to have reached entropy already. Just what are you flavoring your coffee with? Try putting that sealed jar with the shrimp in a dark room and see how long the shrimp lives. Might that give you a clue? Come back when you're sober/unstoned. --Damon Screw 'perpetual motion' and 'free' energy. I'd rather win the Lottery. With that, I have a chance to win. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote in message ups.com... Perpetual Motion, is like a rubics cube that has never been solved. Every single scientist who has approached it, denies it. Every single scientist, that has attempted to solve the problem and produce a system that operates over unity, has labeled it impossible. In spite of how some people seem to believe that the Universe is broken, although, it continues with closed environmental systems deep in caves, ecosystems that require no light, and rely completely on chemosynthesis, they still insist that the Universe, cannot support perpetual motion. Although, it may require billions of years for the moon to finally fall to the Earth, they have all given up on the math. They throw down the puzzle, just like the rubics cube so many recollect having been thrown before. Why don't they run around in a panic and just start screaming "Entropy! We're all gonna die!" There is no reason that a closed loop system cannot work. Every time you see that shrimp in a bottle with a tiny piece of kelp to keep enough oxygen around, it hasn't stopped producing bioelectric impulses or it's thinking by as much it's breathing, nor limited the creature physical strength. It has to be possible, or it wouldn't happen. It is the assumption of the quitters that have given up, or never tried, that will tell you that it's against the laws of thermodynamics. But, far be it from them to know how many BTUs it would require to heat a living room of 30' X 30' X 8', from a temperature of 0 degrees celsius at sea level. Entropy of intellect will kill us all!! It seems they must of had an early release over at the State Hospital! |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Flavored Coffee Guy wrote:
Perpetual Motion, is like a rubics cube that has never been solved. Every single scientist who has approached it, denies it. Snip ******** Oh dear, the intellectually challenged are out again. -- Malc You know it's a bad day when even the aubergines are plotting against you |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote in message ups.com... Perpetual Motion, is like a rubics cube that has never been solved. Every single scientist who has approached it, denies it. Every single scientist, that has attempted to solve the problem and produce a system that operates over unity, has labeled it impossible. In spite of how some people seem to believe that the Universe is broken, although, it continues with closed environmental systems deep in caves, ecosystems that require no light, and rely completely on chemosynthesis, they still insist that the Universe, cannot support perpetual motion. Although, it may require billions of years for the moon to finally fall to the Earth, they have all given up on the math. They throw down the puzzle, just like the rubics cube so many recollect having been thrown before. Why don't they run around in a panic and just start screaming "Entropy! We're all gonna die!" There is no reason that a closed loop system cannot work. Every time you see that shrimp in a bottle with a tiny piece of kelp to keep enough oxygen around, it hasn't stopped producing bioelectric impulses or it's thinking by as much it's breathing, nor limited the creature physical strength. It has to be possible, or it wouldn't happen. It is the assumption of the quitters that have given up, or never tried, that will tell you that it's against the laws of thermodynamics. But, far be it from them to know how many BTUs it would require to heat a living room of 30' X 30' X 8', from a temperature of 0 degrees celsius at sea level. Entropy of intellect will kill us all!! Find out the difference between the machines. Perpetual motion is different to "free energy" machines. A heat pump produces on average 3kW for every one it uses to operate. Over unity? Some say yes. It moves heat that cost nothing to you to get. So, some free energy there. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Simple perpetual motion. Stop eating or consuming anthing and let's
see what you can do. "The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote in message ups.com... Perpetual Motion, is like a rubics cube that has never been solved. Every single scientist who has approached it, denies it. Every single scientist, that has attempted to solve the problem and produce a system that operates over unity, has labeled it impossible. In spite of how some people seem to believe that the Universe is broken, although, it continues with closed environmental systems deep in caves, ecosystems that require no light, and rely completely on chemosynthesis, they still insist that the Universe, cannot support perpetual motion. Although, it may require billions of years for the moon to finally fall to the Earth, they have all given up on the math. They throw down the puzzle, just like the rubics cube so many recollect having been thrown before. Why don't they run around in a panic and just start screaming "Entropy! We're all gonna die!" There is no reason that a closed loop system cannot work. Every time you see that shrimp in a bottle with a tiny piece of kelp to keep enough oxygen around, it hasn't stopped producing bioelectric impulses or it's thinking by as much it's breathing, nor limited the creature physical strength. It has to be possible, or it wouldn't happen. It is the assumption of the quitters that have given up, or never tried, that will tell you that it's against the laws of thermodynamics. But, far be it from them to know how many BTUs it would require to heat a living room of 30' X 30' X 8', from a temperature of 0 degrees celsius at sea level. Entropy of intellect will kill us all!! |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Today's list of individuals who did not touch a calculator, or do any
research that made pointless comments, that can only be evaluated to equal the intellect of a spear chucker as a the sum of individuals to have posted senseless responses, without working out a single equation is: {May be a real name, more intellegent than the last two, but still did not pick up a calculator or do any research, and knows he writing off of the top of his head. Most likely to deny his total lack knowledge, and support that with benign confidence.} Bob Eld, {Possible real first, isn't so sure of anonymity, but wishes for it.} malc, {stupid nickname, ment for anonymity and confusion. Thinks he's a genius, but far from it, and any of his e-mail can be tracked.} news, {just a stupid nickname, that is intended to show some character, and resolve some false sense of security in anonymity, and it doesn't work either} Solar Flare http://www.abundantearth.com/store/ecosphere.html |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.solenoidcity.com/solenoid...s-70-300p2.htm http://www.h2wtech.com/highdcbrushless.htm Ask this company to design you an Absolutely DC Linear Motor, with a tuned stroke velocity, meaning that the electromagnets will not reach their full field strength until they are 1/5th of the distance each magnet would travel. After that, make sure that they know that the stroke length is more than 8 feet. 1200 Watts, using 3 phase 240VAC produces 1107 Lbs of force. Every time I add more windings, I can reduce the voltage considerable using DC, over AC. Every metal they use has more time to magnetize, than it ever could with AC at 60Hz, hysteresis, and reluctance involved. If they knew that the stroke was 2 seconds long, they could design a device that uses 1/4 of a second interval, and wouldn't move at the same peak velocity, but the peak force produced in pounds could easily be doubled, or even potentially quadupled. You can lift a car with a relatively small amount of voltage and current, but you will be waiting for the magnet to actually magnetize. If I half the magnetization rate, then I can double the power in force by doubling the number of magnetic lines present. The only real way to do that, and require less power for more force in a ratio, of power to force, is double the number of windings, and double the amount of time the coil is on. Changing the wire diameter could cause the coil to require a higher voltage to establish the same number of ampere turns, and increasing the wire diameter to compensate for that would require a larger magnetic core to wind on, with a larger space and volume set asside for the coils. The mechanical force is gained. When you start looking at a very low RPM, that is around 1 to 0.25, most ferromagnetic metals have the time that they need to reach their maximum. As long as that happens, it really changes everything. It's never too slow when you are using a flywheel somewhere, that is actually moving at a high RPM, and smoothing out the linear motion. Faster, is never better with magnetic motors. The metal can help allot. This magnet can lift over 360 Lbs, and the input power is 72 watts. Solenoids are not allowed to clamp, lifting magnets always do. The difference is relatively small. http://www.solenoidcity.com/electrom...e-40-300p2.htm http://www.solenoidcity.com/electrom...E-40-300p1.htm http://www.solenoidcity.com/electrom...e-40-300p2.htm So, if the linear motor is using 1200 Watts to produce 1107 Lbs of force, and I took 1107lbs/360lbs I get 3.075, now I take 3.075*72Watts and get 221.4, that tells me how many watts I would need to lift the same amount of weight using three of those DC magnets. The difference is, that when you turn on that DC magnet, you leave it on, and so you don't notice if it takes 1/2 second, or 1/4 second to reach that full potential. Eventually, it really does work out that a solenoid can be designed as the soul member of an over unity device. The engine that drives the generator. Dre, cross post like everyone else! |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"The Flavored Coffee Guy" wrote in message ups.com... Perpetual Motion, is like a rubics cube that has never been solved. Every single scientist who has approached it, denies it. Every single scientist, that has attempted to solve the problem and produce a system that operates over unity, has labeled it impossible. In spite of how some people seem to believe that the Universe is broken, although, it continues with closed environmental systems deep in caves, ecosystems that require no light, and rely completely on chemosynthesis, they still insist that the Universe, cannot support perpetual motion. Although, it may require billions of years for the moon to finally fall to the Earth, they have all given up on the math. They throw down the puzzle, just like the rubics cube so many recollect having been thrown before. Why don't they run around in a panic and just start screaming "Entropy! We're all gonna die!" There is no reason that a closed loop system cannot work. Every time you see that shrimp in a bottle with a tiny piece of kelp to keep enough oxygen around, it hasn't stopped producing bioelectric impulses or it's thinking by as much it's breathing, nor limited the creature physical strength. It has to be possible, or it wouldn't happen. It is the assumption of the quitters that have given up, or never tried, that will tell you that it's against the laws of thermodynamics. But, far be it from them to know how many BTUs it would require to heat a living room of 30' X 30' X 8', from a temperature of 0 degrees celsius at sea level. Entropy of intellect will kill us all!! The universe is the quintessential perpetual motion machine. There is no time dimension, space''time'' dimension, block time/universe, nor chrononon time particle.Space and objects simply continue in a Now universe always in continuous change (motion) . from: Spirit of Truth (using June's e-mail to communicate to you)! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Perpetual motion | Forgetful Goldfish | Physics - General Discussion | 6 | August 24th 06 01:58 PM |
| Perpetual motion | Nick Summers | The Theory of Relativity | 4 | December 14th 05 05:31 PM |
| Perpetual Motion | CoreyWhite@gmail.com | Physics - General Discussion | 108 | September 9th 05 02:16 PM |
| Perpetual Motion | Geoffrey Stoffel | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 5 | December 16th 04 03:07 PM |
| Perpetual Motion.... again | An Observer | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 10 | July 29th 04 08:22 PM |