![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: conventional, field, magnet, meaning |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some
iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result. Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the electromagnetic force is carried by photons. So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that we observe? I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment. Many thanks, Jeff Silverman |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Jeff Silverman:
"Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)" wrote in message ... We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result. Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the electromagnetic force is carried by photons. *virtual* photons. So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that we observe? It is the action of conveying electro*static* force (aka. charge). Length contraction/time dilation provide the particular geometries associated with magnetism. I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment. Look for demonstrations involving pith balls on string. David A. Smith |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps) wrote: We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result. Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the electromagnetic force is carried by photons. So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that we observe? I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment. An excellent question. It's excellent because it points to so many notions that *sound* plausibly correct but are not. For example, one might guess that the photons travel in paths that follow the lines of force. They do not. So what is going on, then? I'll try to put it in colloquial terms and as a result will be a little sloppy. Don't make too much of what I say. In an interaction between a magnet and an iron filing, *lots* of photons are exchanged. These do a lot of things, but chiefly they cause jiggling, small perturbations. When things get jiggled, they tend to settle, and settling really means migrating to a position/orientiation of lower energy. What a photon from an orbiting atom does when it encounters an orbiting electron in another (distant) atom is jiggle it so that the planes of orientation of the electron orbits tend to line up -- this turns out to be a position of lower energy. The lines of force tell you essentially what is the orientiation of minimum energy, for every point in space surrounding a magnet, and the density of the lines of force tell you how steep the slope is to get to that orientation if the filing is not in that orientation. That's basically all there is to it, in a very very coarse fashion. Now the quantitative details require more work... PD |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:
Dear Jeff Silverman: "Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)" wrote in message t... We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result. Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the electromagnetic force is carried by photons. *virtual* photons. I think I know what a "virtual" electron or a "virtual" positron is: if you have a photon rocketing through space, it may spontaneously form an electron-positron pair, which will collapse on itself and convert back to a photon. But what is a virtual photon? So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that we observe? It is the action of conveying electro*static* force (aka. charge). Length contraction/time dilation provide the particular geometries associated with magnetism. I don't understand this answer. If the space/time in the region is distorted, then why isn't light affected when it travels through the vacinity of the magnet? I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment. Look for demonstrations involving pith balls on string. Oh. I supposed you could also do it with two Van De Graff generators. Duh. Okay, that wasn't a very good question. David A. Smith Jeff Silverman |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps) a écrit :
We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result. Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the electromagnetic force is carried by photons. So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that we observe? I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment. Many thanks, Jeff Silverman Hello, I really don't know why one has to speak of photons in relation with a "static" magnetic field. The famous duality between photons and waves is just that : you have to have a wave. If the period of your wave tends to infinity, I wonder about the strange "photon" you will get... The inter action between a permanent magnet field and the "filings" is in reality an interaction between a paramagnetic or ferromagnetic VERY anisotropic particle with a static field - very difficult to explain without solid state magnetics- and therefore excludes in some way or the other when an explanation is given to beginners. An experiment with a electrostatic field : In a flat glas container, put some very visquous transparent and non-conducting fluid (castoroil will work fine), two electrodes of convenient form and strew some not too finely ground flour over the surface. When applying a potential difference of several kV the particles will align as in the magnetostatic case. Good luck pom |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Jeff Silverman:
"Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)" wrote in message cQ.com... N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote: Dear Jeff Silverman: "Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)" wrote in message et... We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result. Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the electromagnetic force is carried by photons. *virtual* photons. I think I know what a "virtual" electron or a "virtual" positron is: if you have a photon rocketing through space, it may spontaneously form an electron- positron pair, which will collapse on itself and convert back to a photon. That is simply "spontaneous pair creation" of real particles. But what is a virtual photon? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_photon .... it is a particle that is exchanged between two charges. Many physicists believe that there are no real photons, simply a very long series of virtual photons (doing a baton pass). So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that we observe? It is the action of conveying electro*static* force (aka. charge). Length contraction/time dilation provide the particular geometries associated with magnetism. I don't understand this answer. If the space/time in the region is distorted, then why isn't light affected when it travels through the vacinity of the magnet? Since this effect is correlated with "linear" motion, and not mass, "gravitational lensing" is not an issue. And there are predicted, very tiny effects on photons passing through very powerful magnetic fields. Currently being tooled up to see if the theory works (and I can't remember the name). I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment. Look for demonstrations involving pith balls on string. Oh. I supposed you could also do it with two Van De Graff generators. Duh. Okay, that wasn't a very good question. And see what effect a magnetic field has on a moving charged pith ball... David A. Smith |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) a écrit :
Dear Jeff Silverman: "Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)" wrote in message cQ.com... N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote: Dear Jeff Silverman: "Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)" wrote in message ... We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result. Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the electromagnetic force is carried by photons. *virtual* photons. I think I know what a "virtual" electron or a "virtual" positron is: if you have a photon rocketing through space, it may spontaneously form an electron- positron pair, which will collapse on itself and convert back to a photon. That is simply "spontaneous pair creation" of real particles. But what is a virtual photon? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_photon ... it is a particle that is exchanged between two charges. Many physicists believe that there are no real photons, simply a very long series of virtual photons (doing a baton pass). So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that we observe? It is the action of conveying electro*static* force (aka. charge). Length contraction/time dilation provide the particular geometries associated with magnetism. I don't understand this answer. If the space/time in the region is distorted, then why isn't light affected when it travels through the vacinity of the magnet? Since this effect is correlated with "linear" motion, and not mass, "gravitational lensing" is not an issue. And there are predicted, very tiny effects on photons passing through very powerful magnetic fields. Currently being tooled up to see if the theory works (and I can't remember the name). I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment. Look for demonstrations involving pith balls on string. Oh. I supposed you could also do it with two Van De Graff generators. Duh. Okay, that wasn't a very good question. And see what effect a magnetic field has on a moving charged pith ball... David A. Smith Hmm... are you sure you meant to reply to me, pom or M. Silverman? Anyway, your message has only a very slight relation to the original one. Baffled POM |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear pom:
"pom" wrote in message ... N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) a écrit : Dear Jeff Silverman: .... Hmm... are you sure you meant to reply to me, pom or M. Silverman? See where I said "Dear Jeff Silverman" above? Anyway, your message has only a very slight relation to the original one. Baffled Blame it on Thunderbird... David A. Smith |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Any alternatives for conventional gasoline? | habshi | Physics - General Discussion | 3 | June 25th 06 02:35 PM |
| Any Conventional Fusion Judgements? | Tom | Fusion Discussions | 0 | January 5th 06 07:57 PM |
| Non-conventional Dimenion Analysis?? | Gert-Jan | Current Physics Research (Moderated) | 1 | June 30th 05 05:53 AM |
| Field of a permanent magnet | Eyal Fleminger | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 6 | March 9th 05 07:45 AM |
| Direction of Conventional Current | Animesh Maurya | Physics - General Discussion | 7 | August 3rd 03 05:42 PM |