A Physics forum. Physics Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Physics Banter forum » Physics Newsgroups » Physics - General (alternative forum)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Tags: , , ,

What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 7th 06 posted to alt.sci.physics
Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?

We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some
iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to
the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment
and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so
alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a
small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the
same result.

Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the
electromagnetic force is carried by photons. So far, so good. But what
is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that
we observe?

I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical
charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment.


Many thanks,


Jeff Silverman
Ads
  #2  
Old August 8th 06 posted to alt.sci.physics
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,805
Default What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?

Dear Jeff Silverman:

"Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)"
wrote in message
...
We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top
if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron
filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force".
School children perform this experiment and it always
impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena
is so alien to their experience to this point.
Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a
magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result.

Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that
the electromagnetic force is carried by photons.


*virtual* photons.

So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of
the photons that cause the force lines that we
observe?


It is the action of conveying electro*static* force (aka.
charge). Length contraction/time dilation provide the particular
geometries associated with magnetism.

I suppose that the same question could be asked
about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity
but I'm not sure how to run that experiment.


Look for demonstrations involving pith balls on string.

David A. Smith


  #3  
Old August 8th 06 posted to alt.sci.physics
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20,093
Default What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?


Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps) wrote:
We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some
iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to
the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment
and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so
alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a
small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the
same result.

Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the
electromagnetic force is carried by photons. So far, so good. But what
is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that
we observe?

I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical
charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that experiment.


An excellent question. It's excellent because it points to so many
notions that *sound* plausibly correct but are not. For example, one
might guess that the photons travel in paths that follow the lines of
force. They do not.

So what is going on, then? I'll try to put it in colloquial terms and
as a result will be a little sloppy. Don't make too much of what I say.

In an interaction between a magnet and an iron filing, *lots* of
photons are exchanged. These do a lot of things, but chiefly they cause
jiggling, small perturbations. When things get jiggled, they tend to
settle, and settling really means migrating to a position/orientiation
of lower energy.

What a photon from an orbiting atom does when it encounters an orbiting
electron in another (distant) atom is jiggle it so that the planes of
orientation of the electron orbits tend to line up -- this turns out to
be a position of lower energy. The lines of force tell you essentially
what is the orientiation of minimum energy, for every point in space
surrounding a magnet, and the density of the lines of force tell you
how steep the slope is to get to that orientation if the filing is not
in that orientation.

That's basically all there is to it, in a very very coarse fashion. Now
the quantitative details require more work...

PD

  #4  
Old August 9th 06 posted to alt.sci.physics
Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?

N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:

Dear Jeff Silverman:

"Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)"
wrote in message
t...


We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top
if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron
filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force".
School children perform this experiment and it always
impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena
is so alien to their experience to this point.
Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a
magnet and note which way it points and we get the same result.

Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that
the electromagnetic force is carried by photons.



*virtual* photons.


I think I know what a "virtual" electron or a "virtual" positron is: if
you have a photon rocketing through space, it may spontaneously form an
electron-positron pair, which will collapse on itself and convert back
to a photon. But what is a virtual photon?



So far, so good. But what is the motion or action of
the photons that cause the force lines that we
observe?



It is the action of conveying electro*static* force (aka.
charge). Length contraction/time dilation provide the particular
geometries associated with magnetism.


I don't understand this answer. If the space/time in the region is
distorted, then why isn't light affected when it travels through the
vacinity of the magnet?

I suppose that the same question could be asked
about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity
but I'm not sure how to run that experiment.



Look for demonstrations involving pith balls on string.


Oh. I supposed you could also do it with two Van De Graff generators.
Duh. Okay, that wasn't a very good question.

David A. Smith




Jeff Silverman
  #5  
Old August 9th 06 posted to alt.sci.physics
pom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?

Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps) a écrit :
We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top if, pour on some
iron filings and shake gently. The iron filings line up according to
the magnetic "lines of force". School children perform this experiment
and it always impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena is so
alien to their experience to this point. Furthermore, we can put a
small compass near a magnet and note which way it points and we get the
same result.

Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that the
electromagnetic force is carried by photons. So far, so good. But what
is the motion or action of the photons that cause the force lines that
we observe?

I suppose that the same question could be asked about two electrical
charges in reasonable proximity but I'm not sure how to run that
experiment.


Many thanks,


Jeff Silverman

Hello,
I really don't know why one has to speak of photons in relation with a
"static" magnetic field.
The famous duality between photons and waves is just that : you have to
have a wave. If the period of your wave tends to infinity, I wonder
about the strange "photon" you will get...
The inter action between a permanent magnet field and the "filings" is
in reality an interaction between a paramagnetic or ferromagnetic VERY
anisotropic particle with a static field
- very difficult to explain without solid state magnetics-
and therefore excludes in some way or the other when an explanation is
given to beginners.
An experiment with a electrostatic field :
In a flat glas container, put some very visquous transparent and
non-conducting fluid (castoroil will work fine), two electrodes of
convenient form and strew some not too finely ground flour over the
surface.
When applying a potential difference of several kV the particles will
align as in the magnetostatic case.
Good luck
pom
  #6  
Old August 9th 06 posted to alt.sci.physics
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,805
Default What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?

Dear Jeff Silverman:

"Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)"
wrote in message
cQ.com...
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:

Dear Jeff Silverman:

"Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)"
wrote in message
et...

We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top
if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron
filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force".
School children perform this experiment and it always
impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena
is so alien to their experience to this point.
Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a
magnet and note which way it points and we get the
same result.

Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that
the electromagnetic force is carried by photons.


*virtual* photons.

I think I know what a "virtual" electron or a "virtual"
positron is: if you have a photon rocketing through
space, it may spontaneously form an electron-
positron pair, which will collapse on itself and convert
back to a photon.


That is simply "spontaneous pair creation" of real particles.

But what is a virtual photon?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_photon
.... it is a particle that is exchanged between two charges. Many
physicists believe that there are no real photons, simply a very
long series of virtual photons (doing a baton pass).

So far, so good. But what is the motion or action

of the photons that cause the force lines that we
observe?


It is the action of conveying electro*static* force
(aka. charge). Length contraction/time dilation
provide the particular geometries associated with
magnetism.

I don't understand this answer. If the space/time in
the region is distorted, then why isn't light affected
when it travels through the vacinity of the magnet?


Since this effect is correlated with "linear" motion, and not
mass, "gravitational lensing" is not an issue. And there are
predicted, very tiny effects on photons passing through very
powerful magnetic fields. Currently being tooled up to see if
the theory works (and I can't remember the name).

I suppose that the same question could be asked
about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity
but I'm not sure how to run that experiment.


Look for demonstrations involving pith balls on string.

Oh. I supposed you could also do it with two Van De
Graff generators. Duh. Okay, that wasn't a very
good question.


And see what effect a magnetic field has on a moving charged pith
ball...

David A. Smith


  #7  
Old August 9th 06 posted to alt.sci.physics
pom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?

N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) a écrit :
Dear Jeff Silverman:

"Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)"
wrote in message
cQ.com...
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) wrote:

Dear Jeff Silverman:

"Jeff Silverman (Remove the letters in all caps)"
wrote in message
...

We take a conventional magnet, put a stiff card on top
if, pour on some iron filings and shake gently. The iron
filings line up according to the magnetic "lines of force".
School children perform this experiment and it always
impresses the hell out of 'em because the phenomena
is so alien to their experience to this point.
Furthermore, we can put a small compass near a
magnet and note which way it points and we get the
same result.

Then, in undergraduate physics classes, we learn that
the electromagnetic force is carried by photons.

*virtual* photons.

I think I know what a "virtual" electron or a "virtual"
positron is: if you have a photon rocketing through
space, it may spontaneously form an electron-
positron pair, which will collapse on itself and convert
back to a photon.


That is simply "spontaneous pair creation" of real particles.

But what is a virtual photon?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_photon
... it is a particle that is exchanged between two charges. Many
physicists believe that there are no real photons, simply a very
long series of virtual photons (doing a baton pass).

So far, so good. But what is the motion or action
of the photons that cause the force lines that we
observe?
It is the action of conveying electro*static* force
(aka. charge). Length contraction/time dilation
provide the particular geometries associated with
magnetism.

I don't understand this answer. If the space/time in
the region is distorted, then why isn't light affected
when it travels through the vacinity of the magnet?


Since this effect is correlated with "linear" motion, and not
mass, "gravitational lensing" is not an issue. And there are
predicted, very tiny effects on photons passing through very
powerful magnetic fields. Currently being tooled up to see if
the theory works (and I can't remember the name).

I suppose that the same question could be asked
about two electrical charges in reasonable proximity
but I'm not sure how to run that experiment.

Look for demonstrations involving pith balls on string.

Oh. I supposed you could also do it with two Van De
Graff generators. Duh. Okay, that wasn't a very
good question.


And see what effect a magnetic field has on a moving charged pith
ball...

David A. Smith


Hmm...
are you sure you meant to reply to me, pom or M. Silverman?
Anyway, your message has only a very slight relation to the original one.
Baffled
POM
  #8  
Old August 10th 06 posted to alt.sci.physics
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,805
Default What is the meaning of the field about a conventional magnet?

Dear pom:

"pom" wrote in message
...
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) a écrit :
Dear Jeff Silverman:

....
Hmm...
are you sure you meant to reply to me, pom or
M. Silverman?


See where I said "Dear Jeff Silverman" above?

Anyway, your message has only a very slight
relation to the original one.
Baffled


Blame it on Thunderbird...

David A. Smith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any alternatives for conventional gasoline? habshi Physics - General Discussion 3 June 25th 06 02:35 PM
Any Conventional Fusion Judgements? Tom Fusion Discussions 0 January 5th 06 07:57 PM
Non-conventional Dimenion Analysis?? Gert-Jan Current Physics Research (Moderated) 1 June 30th 05 05:53 AM
Field of a permanent magnet Eyal Fleminger Electromagnetic Theory and Applications 6 March 9th 05 07:45 AM
Direction of Conventional Current Animesh Maurya Physics - General Discussion 7 August 3rd 03 05:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Physics Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Credit Cards - Free mobile phone's stuffs - Quick Collect - Samsung - Credit Card