![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: old, same, thing, time, travel |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just recently read the article "A Class of Time-Machine Solutions
with a Compact Vacuum Core" from physical review letters, published on july 7th. I must say I didn't understand most of it and I have some questions. Not questions about the article itself, which I would need to read much more stuff than you can probably teach me in one news post (if someone knows sites that could help me out I'd be thankful), but questions about the simple time travel idea. Does that paradox about the guy that goes back to the past and kills his own father before he was born have any workaround? What I could understand from the article is that is theoretically possible to go back in time, doesn't it mean that the theories that allow that have some kind of flaw? After all, going back in the past leads to a paradox, doesn't it? []'s Rafael |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear Rafael Almeida:
"Rafael Almeida" wrote in message ... I just recently read the article "A Class of Time-Machine Solutions with a Compact Vacuum Core" from physical review letters, published on july 7th. I must say I didn't understand most of it and I have some questions. Not questions about the article itself, which I would need to read much more stuff than you can probably teach me in one news post (if someone knows sites that could help me out I'd be thankful), but questions about the simple time travel idea. Does that paradox about the guy that goes back to the past and kills his own father before he was born have any workaround? Several. Multiple Universes. Or Nature's way, preventing backward time travel altogether. What I could understand from the article is that is theoretically possible to go back in time, No, it is not theoretically possible. It is SciFi. A theory implies experimentally falsifiable prediction. doesn't it mean that the theories that allow that have some kind of flaw? After all, going back in the past leads to a paradox, doesn't it? Several. Conservation of Energy, Pauli Exclusion. And strictly going back in time (or forward discontinuously) will leave you floating in the depths of space, since the Earth has a velocity of 300 km/sec. So the Earth would be somewhere else when you arrived. David A. Smith |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rafael Almeida wrote: I just recently read the article "A Class of Time-Machine Solutions with a Compact Vacuum Core" Perhaps the reliance on a "Compact Vacuum Core" is because you need to be a big sucker for this to work? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Viable Time Travel? BETH - A Story of Travel and Colonization | Exoptica | Electromagnetic Theory and Applications | 2 | July 12th 05 09:56 PM |
| Viable Time Travel? BETH - A Story of Travel and Colonization | Exoptica | Physics - New Theories | 0 | July 11th 05 10:32 PM |
| Viable Time Travel? BETH - A Story of Travel and Colonization | Exoptica | Physics - General (alternative forum) | 0 | July 11th 05 10:31 PM |
| [PG] The Next Big Thing in interstellar travel | Larry Hammick | The Theory of Relativity | 0 | February 19th 05 04:15 AM |
| Time and time travel explained by a time traveller | Time Traveller | Particle Physics | 12 | May 29th 04 09:33 AM |