Does 'time' exhibit wave properties

If gravity is a wave/particle, and 'time' is a function of it's definition.
Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic, linear measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

R. Henry Nigl
www.exoptica.com

Dear RHNL:

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle,

Gravity is a particle in quantum mechanics. It is not a wave in
the sense you think, since it (gravitation) is geometry itself.

and 'time' is a function of it's definition.

What "it's" do you refer to?

Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic,
linear measure.

Time is what a clock measures.

If not so, does time radiate?

No, but it does fly! ;)

David A. Smith

'It's' of course, refers to 'gravity' in the initial reference.

RHNL


"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" N: dlzc1 D:cox wrote in
message news:9fvMe.57062$E95.49476@fed1read01...
Dear RHNL:

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle,

Gravity is a particle in quantum mechanics. It is not a wave in
the sense you think, since it (gravitation) is geometry itself.

and 'time' is a function of it's definition.

What "it's" do you refer to?

Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic,
linear measure.

Time is what a clock measures.

If not so, does time radiate?

No, but it does fly! ;)

David A. Smith

"RHNL" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
'It's' of course, refers to 'gravity' in the initial reference.

RHNL


"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" N: dlzc1 D:cox wrote in
message news:9fvMe.57062$E95.49476@fed1read01...
Dear RHNL:

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle,

Gravity is a particle in quantum mechanics. It is not a wave in
the sense you think, since it (gravitation) is geometry itself.

Gravity is not a particle. Also not in quantum mechanics. Lets say there are
speculations on which claim to be theory - GR and string theories - for
example.


and 'time' is a function of it's definition.

If it would be a function of something else, it would not be fundamental.


What "it's" do you refer to?

Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic,
linear measure.


No it is not. But waves and particles - both - travel in time.

Time is what a clock measures.

If the clock goes wrong of shure not.


If not so, does time radiate?

No time does not radiate. It just separates the future from the past. Thats
time.


No, but it does fly! ;)


No time does not fly but it seams to stream continuous and everywhere. It
seems that time had a beginning but no end.

Joe

David A. Smith

Dear Josef Matz:

"Josef Matz" wrote in message
...

"RHNL" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
....
If gravity is a wave/particle,

Gravity is a particle in quantum mechanics. It is not
a wave in the sense you think, since it (gravitation)
is geometry itself.

Gravity is not a particle.

Graviton. Gravitons have been implicated in the "dual to a black
hole"s that were recently produced.

Also not in quantum mechanics. Lets say there are
speculations on which claim to be theory - GR and
string theories - for example.

I refuse to fight with an unarmed man. GR has made predictions
and these predictions have been experimentally verified. It has
a domain of applicability, the "upper end" of which is still
being debated/analyzed.

As to string theory, it is also entering the realm of the
testable... with the aforementioned "dual to a black hole".

Have a nice day.

David A. Smith

So, all-pervasive physical phenomena are simply defined by their
geometry. Works for Newton, but not all movement in space
follows those law. And Gravitons are only a hypotheses yet unfound,
(but they are effective in filling in statistically for unknowns), are they
not?

Thank you Dr. Smith for the clarification ;)

R. Henry Nigl


"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" N: dlzc1 D:cox wrote in
message news:9fvMe.57062$E95.49476@fed1read01...
Dear RHNL:

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle,

Gravity is a particle in quantum mechanics. It is not a wave in
the sense you think, since it (gravitation) is geometry itself.

and 'time' is a function of it's definition.

What "it's" do you refer to?

Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic,
linear measure.

Time is what a clock measures.

If not so, does time radiate?

No, but it does fly! ;)

David A. Smith

"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" N: dlzc1 D:cox wrote in
message news:9fvMe.57062$E95.49476@fed1read01...
Dear RHNL:

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle,

Gravity is a particle in quantum mechanics. It is not a wave in
the sense you think, since it (gravitation) is geometry itself.

and 'time' is a function of it's definition.

What "it's" do you refer to?

Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic,
linear measure.

Time is what a clock measures.


.... and of course there is Planck's constant. RHNL


If not so, does time radiate?

No, but it does fly! ;)

David A. Smith

"Josef Matz" wrote in message
...

"RHNL" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
'It's' of course, refers to 'gravity' in the initial reference.

RHNL


"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" N: dlzc1 D:cox wrote in
message news:9fvMe.57062$E95.49476@fed1read01...
Dear RHNL:

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle,

Gravity is a particle in quantum mechanics. It is not a wave in
the sense you think, since it (gravitation) is geometry itself.

Gravity is not a particle. Also not in quantum mechanics. Lets say there
are
speculations on which claim to be theory - GR and string theories - for
example.


and 'time' is a function of it's definition.

If it would be a function of something else, it would not be fundamental.


What "it's" do you refer to?

Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic,
linear measure.


No it is not. But waves and particles - both - travel in time.

Time is what a clock measures.

If the clock goes wrong of shure not.


If not so, does time radiate?

No time does not radiate. It just separates the future from the past.
Thats
time.


No, but it does fly! ;)


No time does not fly but it seams to stream continuous and everywhere.

Only in subjective terms. Take a really big acid trip ( I do not reccomend
this procedure) and time can get very discontinuous!

sr

It
seems that time had a beginning but no end.

Joe

David A. Smith

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
If gravity is a wave/particle,

So far, efforts to verify this supposition have not been successful.

and 'time' is a function of [gravity's] definition.

Time is not dependent on the definition of gravity. It is essential to
Special Relativity, wherein it appears as a geometric dimension orthogonal
to the three spatial dimensions, and interconvertible with them through a
simple rotation of the coordinate system corresponding to the introduction
of a relative evlocity between the observer and the phenomenon being
observed.

There is no gravity in Special Relativity Theory.

Is 'time' also a wave/particle, or simply a synthetic, linear measure.

If not so, does time radiate?

Since your premises are not valid, the question you have raised based upon
those premises are moot.


Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

Dear RHNL:

"RHNL" wrote in message
...
So, all-pervasive physical phenomena are simply defined by
their
geometry. Works for Newton, but not all movement in space
follows those law.

Yes "all movements in space" do, since space is defined by c and
time.

And Gravitons are only a hypotheses yet unfound,
(but they are effective in filling in statistically for
unknowns),
are they not?

Gravitons are as yet "unfound", yes. But it isn't "statistics"
that requires them.

And I am not a Phd, merely a mechanical engineer.

David A. Smith