![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
| Tags: changed, size, space |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I understand that the big bang is to be interpreted as an explosion of space
rather than an explosion in space. I am wondering why it should be seen that way. I can see how the fact that galaxies that are further from us in all directions are receding from us faster than those that are closer to us, and that implies that the matter in space is, for the most part flying away from a point. But what motivates the idea that space itself was ever compact. Also, if space itself is inflating, then are stars, planets, cars, people, and atoms also growing in three dimensions? If we are, are we able to detect it? Does it have an effect on physics in the small? So far I am unconvinced that space itself has changed in size. |
| Ads |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dear opin:
"opin" wrote in message ... I understand that the big bang is to be interpreted as an explosion of space rather than an explosion in space. I am wondering why it should be seen that way. Because objects are seen to be accelerating. Classically, how can one get objects to accelerate? Forces, right? What *repulsive* force is capable of accelerating expansion? I can see how the fact that galaxies that are further from us in all directions are receding from us faster than those that are closer to us, and that implies that the matter in space is, for the most part flying away from a point. Not really. All objects *appear* to be flying away from us... a minor difference. But what motivates the idea that space itself was ever compact. The CMBR filled the early Universe. The CMBR could be at most a few tens of million light years thick, and produce the spectra that it does. Our supercluster is larger than a "few tens of million light years"... Also, if space itself is inflating, then are stars, planets, cars, people, and atoms also growing in three dimensions? Can't really say. Could be shrinking. If we are, are we able to detect it? No. Our measurement tools self-adjust to our frame of reference. Does it have an effect on physics in the small? No. The small Universe, quantum, could care less about distance. So far I am unconvinced that space itself has changed in size. OK. Try: URL:http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htm .... when the server is back up ... Just keep an open mind. David A. Smith |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| QUAKE CHANGED EARTH'S SHAPE, ROTATION | Dr. Jai Maharaj | Physics - General Discussion | 0 | January 11th 05 10:57 AM |
| Hawkings changed his theory because he already wrote about it long ago. | Peter K. | The Theory of Relativity | 5 | August 15th 04 12:39 PM |
| I've Noticed The Tone of The Cold Fusion Debate Has Changed! | JohnnyCJohnny | Physics - General Discussion | 43 | September 29th 03 03:51 AM |
| I've Noticed The Tone of The Cold Fusion Debate Has Changed! | JohnnyCJohnny | Fusion Discussions | 44 | September 29th 03 03:51 AM |